Background: The Classroom-as-Organization (CAO) is an experiential learning course in which students create and manage an organization as part of class activities. Student interaction with peers is an important feature of the CAO. Educators suggested that student interactions in CAOs follow certain patterns, but these observations have not been tested in empirical research. Purpose: The research focused on exploring patterns of interaction in a CAO. Methodology/Approach: Network data were collected from students and instructors at four different times during a two-semester CAO course. The authors then used social status theory, friendship formation literature, and Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analysis (SIENA) to test hypotheses about interactions in the CAO. Findings/Conclusions: The authors found evidence that (a) localized informal leaders emerge in the class, (b) reciprocation ties between individuals happens within, but not necessarily between departments, and (c) there is a close connection between class-related interactions and social interactions outside of the class, impacting leadership in the CAO. Implications: Instructors need to pay close attention to understanding and managing interdepartmental relationships in CAOs. Furthermore, educators may only have a limited understanding of CAO group dynamics, given that they may not have a high awareness of student social interactions outside of class.
AgneessensF.WittekR. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002
3.
AnW. (2015). Multilevel meta network analysis with application to studying network dynamics of network interventions. Social Networks, 43, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.006
4.
ArmstrongS. J. (2011). From the editors: Continuing our quest for meaningful impact on management practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 181–187.
5.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited (Vol. 1). Jossey-Bass.
BornsteinR. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289.
8.
BowmanN. A. (2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309352495
9.
BrightD. S.CazaA.TureskyE. F.PutzelR.NelsonE.LuechtefeldR. (2016). Constructivist meta-practices: When students design activities, lead others, and assess peers. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(4), 75–99.
10.
CariniR. M.KuhG. D.KleinS. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
11.
CohenA. R. (1976). Beyond simulation: Treating the classroom as an organization. Journal of Management Education, 2(1), 13–19.
12.
ConklinT. A. (2013). Making it personal: The importance of student experience in creating autonomy-supportive classrooms for millennial learners. Journal of Management Education, 37(4), 499–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912456296
13.
DixonG. (2011). Service learning and integrated, collaborative project management. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20206
14.
EysM. A.RitchieS.LittleJ.SladeH.OddsonB. (2008). Leadership status congruency and cohesion in outdoor expedition groups. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(1), 78–94.
15.
FlynnF. J.ReagansR. E.AmanatullahE. T.AmesD. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123–1137.
16.
FosterG. (2005). Making friends: A nonexperimental analysis of social pair formation. Human Relations, 58(11), 1443–1465.
17.
GellinA. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0066
18.
GouldR. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. The American Journal of Sociology, 5, 1143-1178.
19.
HollanderE. P. (2012). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. Routledge.
20.
HollanderE. P.OffermannL. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45(2), 179–189.
21.
KayesA. B.KayesD. C.KolbD. A. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation & Gaming, 36(3), 330–354.
22.
KrackhardtD. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393394
McDonaldM. A.SpenceK. (2016). Experiential learning: Impacting student lateral and vertical development. Sport Management Education Journal, 10(2), 140–147.
27.
McDonaldM. A.SpenceK.SheehanB. (2011). Classroom-as-Organization an integral approach. Journal of Integral Theory & Practice, 6(2), 67–81.
28.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
29.
MillerJ. A. (2017). Republication of “experiencing management: A comprehensive, ‘hands-on’ model for the introductory undergraduate management course.”Journal of Management Education, 41(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917692578
30.
ParkerJ. G.SealJ. (1996). Forming, losing, renewing, and replacing friendships: Applying temporal parameters to the assessment of children’s friendship experiences. Child Development, 67(5), 2248–2268.
31.
PiagetJ. (1979). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Penguin Books.
32.
PrellC. (2012). Social network analysis history, theory & methodology. SAGE.
33.
PutzelR. (1992). “Experience base” learning: A Classroom-as-Organization using delegated, rank-order grading. Journal of Management Education, 16(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299201600206
34.
PutzelR.ParkW. (2007). XB: New-paradigm management of the classroom as a complex organization. Journal of Business and Leadership, 3(1), 136–143.
35.
RipleyR. M.SnijdersT. A.BodaZ.VörösA.PreciadoP. (2019). Manual for SIENA (Version 4.0). University of Oxford.
36.
RommeA. G. L. (2003). Organizing education by drawing on organization studies. Organization Studies, 24(5), 697–720.
37.
SheehanB. J.McDonaldM. A.SpenceK. K. (2009). Developing students’ emotional competency using the Classroom-as-Organization approach. Journal of Management Education, 33(1), 77–98.
38.
SnijdersT. A.Van de BuntG. G.SteglichC. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
39.
StraussL. C.VolkweinJ. F. (2002). Comparing student performance and growth in 2- and 4-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014495823183
40.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
41.
WadsworthB. J. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Longman.
42.
WagenheimG. (1992). TEAMS. Team Exercise for Action Management Skills: A semester-long team-management simulation. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED351756
43.
WittekR. P. M. (1999). Interdependence and informal control in organizations. Thela Thesis.
