In a society that is becoming more dynamic, complex, and diverse, the ability to solve ill-structured problems (ISPs) has become an increasingly critical skill. Students who enter adult roles with the cognitive skills to address ISPs will be better able to assume roles in the emerging economies. Opportunities to develop and practice these skills are limited in the traditional schooling structures. In contrast, wilderness education is one environment that provides students opportunities to engage with the critical elements that aid in the development of these cognitive skills. The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of wilderness education on students’ ability to solve ISPs when compared with peers in a traditional classroom setting. Results of this study suggested that students who were engaged in a wilderness education setting showed significant gains in their ISP skills when compared with their peers.
AtchleyR. A.StrayerD. L.AtchleyP. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051474
2.
BixlerB. A. (2007). The effects of scaffolding student’s problem-solving process via question prompts on problem solving and intrinsic motivation in an online learning environment (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest. (3284910)
3.
BrownM. (2010). Transfer: Outdoor adventure education’s Achilles heel? Changing participation as a viable option. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 14, 13-22.
4.
ChenC. H. (2010). Promoting college students’ knowledge acquisition and ill-structured problem solving: Web-based integration and procedure prompts. Computers & Education, 55, 292-303.
5.
ChoiI.LeeK. (2008). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: Classroom management problems for prospective teachers. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57, 99-129.
EwertA.McAvoyL. (2000). The effects of wilderness settings on organized groups: A state-of-knowledge paper. In McCoolS. F.ColeD. N.BorrieW. T.O’LaughlinJ. (Eds.), Wilderness science in a time of change conference: Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry (RMRS-P-15, Vol. 3, pp. 13-26). Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
8.
FieldA. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, England:Sage.
9.
FlemingV. M.AlexanderJ. M. (2001). The benefits of peer collaboration: A replication of delayed posttest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 588-601.
10.
GallowayS. (2002). Theoretical cognitive differences in expert and novice outdoor leader decision-making: Implication for training and development. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2, 19-28.
11.
GeX. (2001). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving process on an ill-structured task using prompts and peer interaction (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest. (3016657)
12.
GeX.ChenC.DavisK. A. (2005). Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 219-248.
13.
GookinJ.LeachS. (2009). Leadership educator notebook: A toolbox for leadership educators (5th ed.). Lander, WY: National Outdoor Leadership School.
14.
HattieJ. A.MarshH. W.NeillJ. T.RichardsG. E. (1997). Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 67, 43-87.
15.
JausovecN. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem solving. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem finding, and creativity (pp. 77-98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
JohnsonS. (2006). The neuroscience of the mentor-learner relationship. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 110, 12-29.
17.
JonassenD. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1), 65-94.
18.
JonassenD. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63-85.
19.
JonassenD. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
20.
JostadJ.PaisleyK.GookinJ. (2012). Wilderness-based semester learning: Understanding the NOLS experience. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 4, 16-26.
21.
KaufmanJ. C.KaufmanS. B.LichtenbergerE. O. (2011). Finding creative potential on intelligence tests via divergent production. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 83-106.
22.
KingP. M.KitchenerK. S. (2002). The reflective judgment model: Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition. In HoferB. K.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
KitchenerK.KingP. (1990). The reflective judgment model: Ten years of research. In CommonsM. L.ArmonC.KohlbergL.RichardsF. A.GrotzerT. A.SinnottJ. D. (Eds.), Adult development: Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (Vol. 2, pp. 63-78). Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
Labouvie-ViefG. (2006). Emerging structure of adult thought. In ArnettJ.TannerJ. (Eds.), Emerging adult in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 59-84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
LewisM. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71, 36-43.
26.
LubartT. I.MouchiroudC. (2003). Creativity: A source of Difficulty in Problem Solving. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 127-148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
McCaffreyT. (2012). Innovation relies on the obscure: A key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science, 23, 215-218.
28.
McKenzieM. (2003). Beyond “The outward bound process”: Rethinking student learning. The Journal of Experiential Education, 26, 8-23.
29.
MorraS.GobboC.MariniZ.SheeseR. (2008). Cognitive development: Neo-piagetian perspectives. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
MumfordM. D.CostanzaD. P.ThrelfallK. V.BaughmanW. A.Reiter-PalmonR. (1993). Personality variables and problem-construction activities: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 365-389.
31.
MurgatroydS. (2010). “Wicked problems” and the work of the school. European Journal of Education, 45, 259-279.
32.
PerryW. (1999). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1970)
33.
ResnickL. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
34.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
SakofsM.ArmstrongG. P. (1996). Into the classroom: The outward bound approach to teaching and learning. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
36.
SibthorpJ.Arthur-BanningS. (2004). Developing life effectiveness through adventure education: The roles of participant expectations, perceptions of empowerment, and learning relevance. Journal of Experiential Education, 27, 32-50.
37.
SibthorpJ.PaisleyK.GookinJ. (2007). Exploring participant development through adventure-based programming: A model from the National Outdoor Leadership School. Leisure Sciences, 29, 1-18.
38.
SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C.PretzJ. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
39.
StroughJ.ChengS.SwensonL. (2002). Preferences for collaborative and individual everyday problem solving in later adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 26-35.
40.
TannerJ.ArnettJ.LeisJ. (2008). Emerging adulthood: Learning and development during the first stage of adulthood. In SmithM. C.DeFrates-DenschN. (Eds.), Handbook of research on adult learning and development (pp. 34-67). New York, NY: Routledge.
