This research study examined the extent of long-term participation in Girls on the Run (GOTR), an experiential learning program for pre-adolescent girls, and its effect on healthy living and self-esteem. To explore these relationships, an exploratory, mixed-methods study was conducted, which involved open- and closed-ended surveys and interviews. Data collection took place in Seattle, Washington, with former Girls on the Run Puget Sound (GOTRPS) participants who now range in age from 8 to 20 years. Specifically, this study scrutinized the (a) long-term participation of the GOTR program, (b) self-perceptions and perceived behavioral changes as a result of GOTR, and (c) whether or not GOTR values were reinforced in the home. Even though the sample size was small, results concluded positive program impact on girls who participated either once (short-term) or repeatedly (long-term). Correlations on long-term participation revealed a positive and statistical significant correlation (r = .350, p = .002).
Barr-WilsonS. K. (2012). Adolescent girls and body image: Influence of an outdoor adventure program on healthy living (Master’s thesis, San Francisco State University). Retrieved from http://sfsu-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.3/123364
2.
BrueningJ. E.DoverK. M.ClarkB. S. (2009). Preadolescent female development through sport and physical activity: A case study of an urban afterschool program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 87-101.
3.
BudbillN. W. (2008). Dirt divas: An examination of an outdoor adventure program’s impact on the development of adolescent girls (Master’s thesis, Prescott College). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1456727)
4.
CasonD.GillisH. L. (1994). A meta-analysis of outdoor adventure programming with adolescents. Journal of Experiential Education, 17, 40-47.
5.
CaulkinsM. C.WhiteD. D.RussellK. C. (2006). The role of physical exercise in wilderness therapy for troubled adolescent women. Journal of Experiential Education, 29, 18-37.
6.
CulpR. H. (1998). Adolescent girls and outdoor recreation: A case study examining constraints and effective programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30, 356-379.
7.
DeBateR. D.GabrielK. P.ZwaldM.HubertyJ.ZhangY. (2009). Changes in psychosocial factors and physical activity frequency among third- to eighth-grade girls who participated in a developmentally focused youth sport program: A preliminary study. Journal of School Health, 79, 474-484.
8.
DeBateR. D.ThompsonS. H. (2005). Girls on the Run: Improvements in self-esteem, body size satisfaction and eating attitudes/behaviors. Eating Weight Disorders Journal, 10, 25-32.
9.
DeBateR.ZhangY.ThompsonS. H. (2007). Changes in commitment to physical activity among 8-to-11-year-old girls participating in a curriculum-based running program. American Journal of Health Education, 38, 276-281.
10.
DennerJ.MeyerB.BeanS. (2010). Young women’s leadership alliance: Youth-adult partnerships in an all-female after-school program. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 87-100.
11.
EiseleH.StakeJ. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233-244.
12.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Allyn & Bacon.
Girls on the Run InternationalBarkerM.W. (2010). Girls on the Run: Curriculum one. Retrieved from Girls on the Run International.
15.
McKenneyP. (1996). A program evaluation of an all-girls’ outdoor adventure program (Master’s thesis, Prescott College). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database at Seattle University.
16.
PassarelliA.HallE.AndersonM. (2010). A strengths-based approach to outdoor and adventure education: Possibilities for personal growth. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 120-135.
17.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
PetersonR. D.GrippoK. P.Tantleff-DunnS. (2008). Empowerment and powerlessness: A closer look at the relationship between feminism, body image and eating disturbance. Sex Roles, 58, 639-648.
19.
PinchK. J. (2007). Of course you have power Batwoman . . . but don’t forget your purse!Journal of Experiential Education, 29, 418-423.
20.
SammetK. (2010). Relationships matter: Adolescent girls and relational development in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 151-165.
21.
StevahnL.Al-AryanA.AlexandreN.AveryC.DelichN.DouglasP.. . .McGahM. (2011). Community based research project: Passages Northwest. Seattle, WA: Seattle University.
22.
WatsonD. L.PoczwardowskiA.EisenmanP. (2000). After-school physical activity programs for adolescent girls. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 71, 17-21.
23.
WhittingtonA. (2006). Challenging girls’ constructions of femininity in the outdoors. Journal of Experiential Education, 28, 205-221.
24.
WhittingtonA.BudbillN. (2013). Breaking the mold: Impacts of adventure education on girls. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 5, 37-53.
25.
WhittingtonA.MackE. N. (2010). Inspiring courage in girls: An evaluation of practices and outcomes. Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 166-180.
26.
WhittingtonA.MackE. N.BudbillN. W.McKenneyP. (2011). All-girls adventure programmes: What are the benefits?Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 11, 1-14.
