This research uses contact theory to examine the impact of a service learning class on college students’ attitudes toward people with disabilities. Students were involved in both lecture material and working directly with people with disabilities in a therapeutic camp environment. Eighty-four students responded to the questionnaires at three time periods over the course of the semester. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-model ANOVA were performed to study the changes in students’ attitudes. The results indicate that there was a change in attitudes after 12 weeks of course instruction and between the beginning of class and after the camp experience. Also, gender and academic major were found to have had little impact on students’ attitudes toward people with disabilities. Implications and limitations of this research are discussed and thoughts for future research are addressed.
AdrianS. E. (1997). Disability, society, and ethical issues: A first-year experience for university students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 178-184.
2.
AhlbornL. J.PanekP. E.JungersM. K. (2008). College students’ perceptions of persons with intellectual disability at three different ages. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29, 61-69.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
AntonakR. F. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the scale of attitudes toward disabled persons. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13(2), 22-29.
6.
AntonakR. F. (1992). Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons (SADP) Form R. Durham: University of New Hampshire.
AstinA. W.SaxL. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 251-263.
9.
BediniL. A. (2000). “Just sit down so we can talk”: Perceived stigma and community recreation pursuits of people with disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34(1). 55-68.
10.
BrannanS. A.FullertonA.ArickJ. R.RobbG. M.BenderM. (2003). Including youth with disabilities in outdoor programs: Best practices, outcomes, and resources. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
11.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221-239.
CaspiA. (1984). Contact hypothesis and inter-age attitudes: A field study of cross-age contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 74-80.
14.
CookS. W. (1985). Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40, 452-460.
15.
DaughertyA. L.RussoM. F. (2011). An assessment of the lasting effects of a stand-alone information literacy course: The students’ perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37, 319-326.
16.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.KawakamiK. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 6, 5-21.
17.
EichingerJ.RizzoT.SirotnikB. (1991). Changing attitudes toward people with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 121-126.
18.
EllisonC. G.PowersD. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385-400.
19.
EllisonC. G.ShinH.LealD. L. (2011). The contact hypothesis and attitudes toward Latinos in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 938-958.
20.
FlanneryD.WardK. (1999). Service learning: A vehicle for developing cultural competence in health education. American Journal of Health Behavior, 23, 323-331.
21.
GalvanC.ParkerM. (2011). Investigating the reciprocal nature of service-learning in physical education teacher education. Journal of Experiential Education, 34, 55-70.
22.
HastingsR. P.HewesA.LockS.WittingA. (1996). Do special education needs courses have any impact on student teachers’ perceptions of children with severe learning difficulties?British Journal of Special Education, 23, 139-144.
23.
HergenratherK.RhodesS. (2007). Exploring undergraduate student attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Application of the Disability Social Relationship Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 66-75.
24.
HornibrookT. (1997). Camp integration and staff training: The crucial link. Journal of Leisurability, 24(2), 37-42.
25.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
KolodziejM. E.JohnsonB. T. (1996). Interpersonal contact and acceptance of persons with psychiatric disorders: A research synthesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1387-1396.
27.
KrajewskiJ.FlahertyT. (2000). Attitudes of high school students toward individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 38, 154-162.
28.
LeeB. A.FarrellC. R.LinkB. G. (2004). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness. American Sociological Review, 69, 40-63.
29.
MarasP.BrownR. (1996). Effects of contact on children’s attitudes toward disability: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2113-2134.
30.
McDougallJ.DeWitD. J.KingG.MillerL. T.KillipS. (2004). High school-aged youths’ attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51, 287-313.
31.
McQuilkinJ. I.FreitagC. B.HarrisJ. L. (1990). Attitudes of college students toward handicapped persons. Journal of College Student Development, 31(1), 17-22.
32.
MeaneyK. S.BohlerH. R.KopfK.HernandezL.ScottL. T. (2008). Service-learning and pre-service educators’ cultural competence for teaching: An exploratory study. Journal of Experiential Education, 31, 189-208.
33.
MeyerL.GouvierW. D.DukeM.AdvokatC. (2001). Influence of social context on reported attitudes of nondisabled students toward students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 50-52.
34.
MoelyB. E.McFarlandM.MironD.MercerS.IlustreV. (2002). Changes in college students’ attitudes and intentions for civic involvement as a function of service-learning experiences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 18-26.
35.
MussoM. W.BarkerA. A.ProtoD. A.GouvierW. D. (2012). College students’ conceptualizations of deficits involved in mild intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 224-228.
36.
NosseL. J.GavinK. J. (1991). Influence of direct contact on college students’ attitudes toward adults with mental handicaps. College Student Journal, 25(2), 201-206.
37.
OliverM. (1993). Social work: Disabled people and disabling environments. London, England: Kingsley.
38.
PalmerG. A.RediniusP. L.TervoR. C. (2000). An examination of attitudes toward disabilities among college students: Rural and urban differences. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, E3(1). Retrieved from http://www.marshall.edu/jrcp/Vole31/palmer.html
39.
PaschallM. J.AntinT.RingwaltC. L.SaltzR. F. (2011). Evaluation of an Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention course for college freshmen: Findings of a randomized multi-campus trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 300-308.
40.
PateJ. R. (2011). Defining disability: An autoethnography on the lived experiences of a person with cerebral palsy. Aigne. Retrieved from http://publish.ucc.ie/aigne/2011/01/pate/02/en
41.
PerryT.IvyM.ConnerA.ShelarD. (2008). Recreation student attitudes towards persons with disabilities: Considerations for future service delivery. The Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism, 7(2), 4-14.
42.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
43.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
PowersD. A.EllisonC. G. (1995). Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205-226.
45.
RiceC. J. (2009). Attitudes of undergraduate students toward people with intellectual disabilities: Considerations for future policy makers. College Student Journal, 43(1), 207-215.
46.
RomanM.MedvedevK. (2011). The importance of peer approval in the sartorial purchasing patterns of the University of Georgia students. College Student Journal, 45(1), 164-176.
47.
RothsteinM. A.MartinezS. A.McKinneyW. P. (2002). Using established medical criteria to define disability: A proposal to amend the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington University Law Quarterly, 80, 243-298.
48.
SciorK. (2011). Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2164-2182.
49.
SeamanJ. (2008). Experience, reflect, critique: The end of the “learning cycles” era. Journal of Experiential Education, 31, 3-18.
50.
SeamanJ.BeightolJ.ShrillaP.CrawfordB. (2010). Contact theory as a framework for experiential activities as diversity education: An exploratory study. Journal of Experiential Education, 32, 207-225.
ShannonC. D.SchoenB.TanseyT. N. (2009). The effect of contact, context, and social power on undergraduate attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 75(4), 11-18.
53.
SigmonR. L. (1979). Service-learning: Three principles. Synergist (National Center for Service-Learning). ACTION, 8(1), 9-11.
54.
TervoR. C.AzumaS.PalmerG.RediniusP. (2002). Medical students’ attitudes toward persons with disability: A comparative study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1537-1542.
55.
TervoR. C.PalmerG. (2004). Health professional student attitudes towards people with disability. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 908-915.
56.
TitchkoskyT. (2001). Disability: A rose by any other name? People-first language in Canadian society. The Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 38, 125-140.
VonofakouC.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Contact with out-group friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804-820.
59.
WatsonG. (1947). Action for unity. New York, NY: Harper.
60.
WilliamsR. M.Jr. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions: A survey of research on ethnic, racial, and religious group tensions (Bulletin No. 57). New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
61.
WoodP. B.BartkowskiJ. P. (2004). Attribution style and public policy attitudes toward gay rights. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 58-74.
