This article reports on a study that examined the ecological identities and philosophies of Canadian experiential environmental educators who incorporate Western and Indigenous traditions into their pedagogical praxis. Guided by the overarching question, “Can Western and Indigenous knowledge of the natural world be blended theoretically and in practice?” notable findings include the clarification of the relationship between Western and Indigenous knowledge and philosophies of Nature as one with the potential for bricolage (integration) but not absolute métissage (blending) unless Western perspectives other than science, such as deep ecology and bioregionalism, are also considered.
AberleyD. (1999). Interpreting bioregionalism: A story from many voices. In McGinnisM. V. (Ed.), Bioregionalism (pp. 13-42). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BarnhardtR.KawagleyA. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 8-23.
3.
BattisteM. (1998). Enabling the autumn seed: Toward a decolonized approach to Aboriginal knowledge, language, and education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22, 16-27.
4.
BerryT. (1999). The great work: Our way into the future. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
5.
BhabhaH. (1998). Cultures in between. In BennettD. (Ed.), Multicultural states: Rethinking difference and identity (pp. 29-36). London, England: Routledge.
6.
CajeteG. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of Indigenous education. Skyland, NC: Kivaki Press.
7.
CajeteG. (1999). “Look to the mountain”: Reflections on indigenous ecology. In CajeteG. (Ed.), A people’s ecology: Explorations in sustainable living (pp. 2-20). Santa Fe, NM: Clearlight Publishers.
8.
CajeteG. (2001). Indigenous education and ecology: Perspectives of an American Indian educator. In GrimJ. A. (Ed.), Indigenous traditions and ecology: The interbeing of cosmology and community (pp. 619-638). Cambridge, MT: Harvard University Press.
9.
CoatesJ.GrayM.HetheringtonT. (2006). An “ecospiritual” perspective: Finally, a place for indigenous approaches. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 381-399.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
11.
CurthoysL. P. (2007). Finding a place of one’s own. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 68-79.
DonaldD. T. (2009). The pedagogy of the fort: Curriculum, Aboriginal-Canadian relations, and indigenous metissage (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Theses Canada Database. (ISBN: 9780494553350)
16.
DorionL.PréfontaineD. R. (1999). Deconstructing Métis historiography: Giving voice to the Métis people. In BarkwellL. J.DorionL.PréfontaineD. R. (Eds.), Resources for Métis researchers (pp. 3-30). Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Louis Riel Institute.
17.
DrengsonA. (2008). The life and work of Arne Naess: An appreciative overview. In DrengsonA.DevallB. (Eds.), Ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess (pp. 3-44). Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
18.
FrancisD. (2005). National dreams: Myth, memory, and Canadian history. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Arsenal Pulp Press.
19.
GibbsE. A. (2000). The changing face of the Metis nation (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
20.
GravelineF. J. (1998). Circle works: Transforming Eurocentric consciousness. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Press.
21.
HatcherA.BartlettC. (2009). MSIT: Transdisciplinary, cross-cultural science. Green Teacher, 86, 7-10.
22.
HatcherA.BartlettC.MarshallM.MarshallA. (2009). Two-eyed seeing: A cross-cultural science journey. Green Teacher, 86, 3-6.
23.
HermesM. (2000). The scientific method, Nintendo, and Eagle feathers: Rethinking the meaning of “culture based” curriculum at an Ojibwe tribal school. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 387-400.
24.
KawagleyA. O.BarnhardtR. (1999). Education indigenous to place: Western science meets native reality. In SmithG. A.WilliamsD. R. (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 117-140). New York: State University of New York Press.
25.
KovachM. (2010). Indigenous methodologies. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
26.
LaDukeW. (2002). The Winona LaDuke reader: A collection of essential writings. Penticton, British Columbia, Canada: Theytus Books.
27.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (2005). Reflections on portraiture: A dialogue between art and science. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 3-15.
28.
LichtmanM. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Little BearL. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In BattisteM. (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 77-85). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
30.
Lowan-TrudeauG. (2012). Methodological métissage: An interpretive Indigenous approach to environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 113-130.
31.
MacyJ. (2007). World as lover, world as self: Courage for global justice and ecological renewal. Berkeley, CA: Parallax.
32.
McGinnisM. V. (1999). A rehearsal to bioregionalism. In McGinnisM. V. (Ed.), Bioregionalism (pp. 1-9). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
MeyerM. A. (2008). Indigenous and authentic: Hawaiian epistemology and the triangulation of meaning. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 217-232). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
34.
NaessA.RothenbergD. (1990). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PieterseJ. N. (2001). Hybridity, so what? The anti-hybridity backlash and the riddles of recognition. Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 219-245.
36.
RichardsonC. L. (2004). Becoming Metis: The relationship between the sense of Metis self and cultural stories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
37.
RothW. M. (2008). Bricolage, métissage, hybridity, heterogeneity, diaspora: Concepts for thinking science education in the 21st century. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 3, 891-916.
38.
SaulJ. R. (2008). A fair country: Telling truths about Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Penguin Group.
39.
SimpsonL. (2004). Anticolonial strategies for recovery and maintenance of Indigenous knowledge. American Indian Quarterly, 28, 373-384.
40.
SnivelyG. (2009). Money from the sea: A cross-cultural Indigenous science activity. Green Teacher, 86, 33-38.
41.
SnowJ. (2005). These mountains are our sacred places. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Fifth House. (Original work published 1977)
42.
StibbeA. (2004). Environmental education across cultures: Beyond the discourse of shallow environmentalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 4, 242-260.
43.
SwayzeN. (2009). Engaging Indigenous urban youth in environmental learning: The importance of place revisited. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 59-72.
44.
ThomashowM. (1996). Ecological identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
WelschW. (1999). Transculturality: The puzzling form of cultures today. In FeatherstoneM.LashS. (Eds.), Spaces of culture: City, nation, world (pp. 194-213). London, England: Sage.
46.
WilsonN. (2008). A waka ama journey: Reflections on outrigger canoe paddling as a medium for epistemological adventuring. Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 21, 19-23.
47.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishers.
