Abstract
Experiential education programs seek meaningful ways to connect field experiences to classroom instruction. To illustrate one way to make this connection, the authors drew on Q methodology, a systematic approach for identifying clusters of people who share common viewpoints. Q methodology was employed in a two-year demonstration project with graduate students in teacher education. Students were provided with a list of varied statements reflecting potential aspects of their fieldwork experiences and indicated their level of agreement or disagreement by sorting their responses on an online quasi-normal template. Q-factor analysis was then applied to develop models of shared field experiences from the card sorts. Those models were useful for whole-group and small-group discussions that systematized student reflections on, and interpretations of, their fieldwork experiences. The findings offer three principal ways that facilitators can implement Q methodology in an effort to help participants make more meaningful connections between the field and the classroom: one requires no electronic technology; a second is a free, automated program; and a third, more advanced approach uses standard statistical software.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
