With the recent promotion of learner-centered philosophies, educators are beginning to accept the idea that learning is a constructive process. But this philosophical shift has been met with some resistance from both students and faculty. This case study examines the development of a student-designed experiential course from both student and faculty perspectives. Seven undergraduate students developed and implemented a 12-day experiential learning course with eight learning outcomes. Discussion revolves around faculty and student hesitation, student motivation, faculty selection, course evaluation, and interpersonal development.
AblinJ. L. (2008). Learning as a problem design versus problem solving: Making the connection between cognitive neuroscience research and educational practice. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(2), 52–54.
2.
BelisleP. (2006). Documentary video and online technologies in qualitative research. VUE, 12–16.
3.
BrenemanD. W. (2001). Foreword. In HellerD. E., (Ed.) The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access and accountability (p. ix). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
4.
BreunigM. (2005). Turning experiential education and critical pedagogy theory into praxis. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(2), 106–122.
5.
CantorJ. A. (1997). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom and community. (ERIC Digest No. ED404948). Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
6.
ChapmanS.McPheeP.ProudmanB. (1995). What is experiential education? In WarrenK.SakofsM.HuntJ. S., (Eds.) The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 235–248). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
7.
CrossK. (1994). The coming of age of experiential education. NSEE Quarterly, 19(4), 1–9.
8.
DenzinN. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S., (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–28). London: Sage.
10.
Donahue-Di ContiV. (2004). Experiential education in a knowledge-based economy: Is it time to reexamine the liberal arts?Journal of General Education, 53(3-4), 167–183.
11.
DouglassB. G.MoustakasC. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25, 39–55.
12.
EstesC. A. (2004). Promoting student-centered learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141–160.
13.
EstesC. A.TombS. (1995). Is cheese food really food? A.k.a. some conscious alternatives to overprocessing experience. Paper presented at the 1995 International Conference on Outdoor Recreation and Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404080).
14.
FelderR. M.BrentR. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44, 43–47.
15.
FriedmanT. (2007). The world is flat. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
16.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: A&B.
17.
HellerD. E. (2001). Introduction: The changing dynamics of affordability, access, and accountability in public higher education. In HellerD. E., (Ed.) The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access and accountability (pp. 1–11). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
18.
HubaM. E.FreedJ. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
HuismanJ.CurrieJ. (2004). Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water?Higher Education, 48, 529–551.
20.
Immordino-YangM. E.DamasioA. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.
21.
JohnsonA.KimballR.MelendezB.MyersL.RheaK.TravisB. (2009). Breaking with tradition: Preparing faculty to teach in a student-centered or problem-solving environment. Primus, 19(2), 146–160.
22.
KrollL. R.LaBoskyV. K. (1996). Practicing what we preach: Constructivism in a teacher education program. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 63–72.
23.
MassimilianoV. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48, 483–510.
24.
McArthurJ. W.SachsJ. (2009). Needed: A new generation of problem solvers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(40), 1–4.
25.
MurphyM. (2009). Bureaucracy and its limits: Accountability and rationality in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(6), 683–695.
26.
O'ConnellT.DymentJ. (2006). Reflections on using journals in higher education: A focus group discussion with faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 671–691.
27.
OwenS. (2006). Situated researcher reflections and professional learning journeys. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 46(1), 114–118.
28.
PalmerP. J. (2007). A new professional: The aims of education revisited. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 6–12.
29.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
RobertsonR. D. (2005). Generative paradox in learner-centered college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 181–194.
31.
WagnerR.ScharingerD.SisakJ. (1995). Enhancing teaching effectiveness using experiential techniques: Model development and empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Region of the Academy of Management, St. Charles, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 345 908).
32.
WarrenK. (1995). The student-centered classroom: A model for teaching experiential education theory. In WarrenK.SakofsM.HuntJ. S., (Eds.) The theory of experiential education (3rd ed., pp. 297–307). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
33.
WeimerM. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
34.
WeimerM. (2006). Enhancing scholarly work on teaching and learning: Professional literature that makes a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
35.
WhiteF. A. (2008). Tenure and promotion 101: What you need to know. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED502681).
36.
WitmanM.RichlinL. (2007). The status of the scholarship of teaching and learning in the disciplines. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 2–17.
37.
WoodsD. R. (1994). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Waterdown, Ontario: Author.
