Leadership Status Congruency and Cohesion in Outdoor Expedition Groups

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between status congruency and group cohesion in outdoor expedition groups in an educational setting. Specifically, three aspects of status congruency were assessed in relation to group cohesion in four adventure canoe groups. The groups participated in 2-week expeditions in the northern areas of the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. The participants were 32 upper-year undergraduate students enrolled in a central Canadian university (Mage = 22.41, SD = 2.43 years). Results indicated that (a) individuals who ranked themselves higher in the group's status hierarchy compared to where their peers ranked them had lower perceptions of their attraction to their group's social pursuits; (b) perceptions of group cohesion were greater when individuals occupying formal leadership positions were higher in the group's status ranking (i.e., greater congruency between formal and informal status hierarchies); and (c) individuals who were members of groups that had some level of consensus regarding status rankings perceived their groups to be more cohesive than those who were members of the group that had no consensus.

Keywords

Status Status Congruency Outdoor Adventure Programming Cohesion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Canoe Association. (n.d.). International Scale of River Rating Difficulty. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://www.americancanoe.org/safety/river_scale.lasso).

Bacharach

S. B.

Bamberger

Mundell

(1993). Status inconsistency in organizations: From social hierarchy to stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 21–36.

Bass

B. M.

(1980). Team productivity and individual member competence. Small Group Behavior, 11, 431–504.

Carron

A. V.

Brawley

L. R.

Eys

M. A.

Bray

S. R.

Dorsch

Estabrooks

(2003). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. Small Group Research, 34, 468–496.

Carron

A. V.

Brawley

L. R.

Widmeyer

W. N.

(1998). The measurement of co-hesiveness in sport groups. In Duda

J. L.

(Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Carron

A. V.

Brawley

L. R.

Widmeyer

W. N.

(2002). The Group Environment Questionnaire test manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Carron

A. V.

Colman

M. M.

Wheeler

Stevens

(2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 168–188.

Carron

A. V.

Hausenblas

H. A.

Eys

M. A.

(2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Carron

A. V.

Widmeyer

W. N.

Brawley

L. R.

(1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.

10.

Drought

Snelleman

(1996). Pukaskwa river canoe guide. Toronto, ON: Ontario Recreational Canoeing Association.

11.

Estabrooks

P. A.

Carron

A. V.

(2000). The Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of cohesion in exercise classes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 230–243.

12.

Golembiewski

(1962). The small group. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

13.

Jacob

C. S.

Carron

A. V.

(1994). Sources of status in intercollegiate sport teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, S67.

14.

Jacob

C. S.

Carron

A. V.

(1998). The association between status and cohesion in sport teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16, 187–198.

15.

Legendre

(2005). Species associations: The Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. Journal of Agriculture, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 10, 226–245.

16.

Martinez

J. C.

(1989). The ingroup bias as a function of differences in resources within groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 251–254.

17.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

18.

Priest

Gass

M. A.

(2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming (2nd ed.). Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics.

19.

Raiola

(2003). Communication and problem-solving in extended field-based outdoor adventure education courses. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 50–54.

20.

Schoel

Prouty

Radcliffe

(1988). Islands of healing: A guide to adventure-based counseling. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

21.

Slater

P. E.

(1955). Role differentiation in small groups. American Sociological Review, 20, 300–310.