According to prevailing models, experiential learning is by definition a stepwise process beginning with direct experience, followed by reflection, followed by learning. It has been argued, however, that stepwise models inadequately explain the holistic learning processes that are central to learning from experience, and that they lack scientific or philosophical foundations. Criticism also centers on the way complex cultural, social, and physical processes during experience and learning are reduced to a rational, excessively cognitive, individual phenomenon. This article reviews this criticism and adds a historical dimension to the analysis, concluding that existing cyclic models might be better valued for their important historical contribution, rather than as active theories of learning in experiential education.
AlthusserL. (1964). Marxism and humanism. Cahiers de l'I.S.E.A., June.
3.
BaldwinC.PersingJ.MagnusonD. (2004). The role of theory, research, and evaluation in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(3), 167–183.
4.
BeachK. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Educational Research, 24, 101–139.
5.
BellM. (1993). What constitutes experience? Rethinking theoretical assumptions. Journal of Experiential Education, 16(1), 19–24.
6.
BereiterC. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
7.
BoudD.KeoghR.WalkerD. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In BoudD.KeoghR.WalkerD. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 19–40). New York: Kogan Page.
8.
BowersC. A. (2005). The false promises of constructivist learning theories: A global and ecological critique. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
9.
BrookesA. (2002). Lost in the Australian bush: Outdoor education as curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 405–425.
10.
BrookesA. (2003). A critique of neo-Hahnian outdoor education theory. Part one: Challenges to the concept of ‘character building’. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 3(1), 49–62.
11.
BrownM. (2004). Let's go round the circle: How verbal facilitation can function as a means of direct instruction. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 161–175.
12.
ChickeringA. (1977). Experience and learning: An introduction to experiential learning. New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press.
13.
CloranC. (1999). Contexts for learning. In ChristieF. (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 31–65). London: Cassell.
14.
ColeM.EngeströmY.VasquezO. (Eds.). (1997). Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ColemanJ. (1976). Differences between experiential and classroom learning. In KeetonM. (Ed.), Experiential learning: Rationale, characteristics and assessment (pp. 49–61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
16.
ConradD.HedinD. (1981). The impact of experiential education: Summary and implications. Journal of Experiential Education, 4(2), 6–20.
17.
EngeströmY.MietinnenR.PunamakiR.-L. (Eds.). (2003). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EnnsC. Z. (1993). Integrating separate and connected knowing: The experiential learning model. Teaching of Psychology, 20(1), 7–13.
19.
FenwickT. (2001). Experiential learning: A theoretical critique from five perspectives. Ohio State University: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
20.
FullagarS.HailstoneS. (1996). Shifting the ground: Feminist theory in the outdoors. Social Alternatives, 15(2), 23–27.
21.
GassM. (2005). Comprehending the value structures influencing significance and power behind experiential education research. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 286–296.
22.
HolmanR.PavlicaK.ThorpeR. (1997). Rethinking Kolb's theory of learning in management education. Management Learning, 28(2), 135–148.
23.
HovelynckJ. (2001). Practice-theories of facilitating experiential learning in Outward Bound: A research report. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1(2), 53–57.
24.
HuntJ. (1990). Philosophy of adventure education. In PriestS.MilesJ. C. (Eds.), Adventure education (pp. 119–128). State College, PA: Venture.
25.
ItinC. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), 91–98.
26.
KeetonM. (Ed.). (1976). Experiential learning: Rationale, characteristics and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
27.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
28.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
KraftR. (1990). Experiential learning. In MilesJ. C.PriestS. (Eds.), Adventure education (pp. 175–183). State College, PA: Venture.
30.
LaveJ. (1993). Introduction. In ChaiklinS.LaveJ. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LoynesC. (2002). The generative paradigm. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 113–125.
32.
McKenzieM. (2000). How are adventure education program outcomes achieved? A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 5(1), 19–28.
33.
MichelsonE. (1996). Usual suspects: Experience, reflection and the (en)gendering of knowledge. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15(6), 438–454.
34.
MichelsonE. (1999). Carnival, paranoia, and experiential learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 31(2), 140–154.
35.
MiettinenR. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72.
36.
PearsonM.SmithD. (1985). Debriefing in experience-based learning. In BoudD.KeoughR.WalkerD. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 69–84). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
37.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
RogoffB.ParadiseR.Meija-ArauzR.Correa-ChavezM.AngelilloC. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203.
39.
RussellK. (2006). Publishing to the choir or digging deep: Implications of a snapshot of experiential education research. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(3), 243–247.
40.
SeamanJ. (2007). Taking things into account: Learning as kinaesthetically mediated collaboration. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 7(1), 3–20.
41.
VinceR. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb's Learning Cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304–319.
42.
WallaceM. (1996). When is experiential learning not experiential learning? In ClaxtonG. (Ed.), Liberating the learner: Lessons for professional development in education (pp. 16–31). New York: Routledge.
43.
WalshV.GolinsG. (1976). The exploration of the Outward Bound process. Unpublished manuscript.
44.
WichmannT. F. (1980). Babies and bath water: Two experiential heresies. Journal of Experiential Education, 6–12.
45.
WilsonA. L.HayesE. R. (2002). From the editors: The problem of (learning in-from-to) experience. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 173–175.
WurdingerS.PaxtonT. (2003). Using multiple levels of experience to promote autonomy in adventure education students. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 3(1), 41–48.
48.
WurdingerS.PriestS. (1999). Integrating theory and application in experiential learning. In MilesJ. C.PriestS. (Eds.), Adventure Programming (pp. 187–192). State College, PA: Venture.
49.
WyattS. (1997). Dialogue, reflection, and community. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(2), 80–85.
