This study examined trust development between participants of outdoor education programs and outdoor leaders. Participants were college students enrolled in outdoor education courses. Using a factorial survey design, the technical ability, interpersonal ability, benevolence, integrity, and gender of an outdoor leader was displayed randomly in a series of scenarios. Along with these leader attributes, the scenarios included two hypothetical situations that occur in outdoor education settings. Participants also completed a measure of dispositional optimism. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling, which revealed that displays of a leader's technical ability, interpersonal ability, benevolence, and integrity each influenced trust scores positively. Implications for future research and for outdoor leadership practice are discussed.
AlvarezA. G.WelshJ. J. (1990). Adventure: A model of experiential learning. Social Work in Education, 13(1), 49–57.
2.
BrowerH. H.SchoormanF. D.TanH. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227–250.
3.
CainJ.JolliffB. (1998). Teamwork and teamplay. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
4.
CaldwellC.ClaphamS. E. (2003). Organizational trustworthiness: An international perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 349–364.
5.
CarverS. C.ScheierM. F. (2005). Optimism. In SnyderC. R., (Ed.) Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 231–243). Cary, NC: Oxford.
6.
ChoyB. (2000). Interpersonal trust in teacher-student relations: Meaning for black students (14–16 years) of Caribbean background in secondary schools in the Greater Toronto Area (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
7.
ClaxtonD.GrubeD.YoungJ. (2001). Using initiative games to build community cooperation and trust. Strategies, 15(1), 35–37.
8.
ClemmensenB. (2002). An exploration of differences and perceptions of difference between male and female challenge course instructors. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(1), 214–219.
9.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
10.
CookK. S. (2001). Trust in society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
CookK. S.HardinR.LeviM. (2005). Cooperation without trust?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
CostiganR. D.IlterS. S.BermanJ. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 303–317.
13.
DavisG. M. (1999). A test of an interpersonal trust model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.
14.
DelugaR. J. (1995). The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology, 7(1), 1–16.
15.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.
16.
DobbinsG. H.PlatzS. J. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: How real are they?Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 118–127.
17.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J.MakhijaniM. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145.
18.
GarrickL. L. (2001). Exploring the development of trust by guides with adult learners in a high-risk adventure education environment (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Alaska, Anchorage.
19.
HardinR. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
HaugenR.OmmundsenY.LundT. (2004). The concept of expectancy: A central factor in various personality dispositions. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 43–55.
21.
HeblM. R. (1995). Gender bias in leader selection. Teaching of Psychology, 22(3), 186–188.
22.
HobbsW.EwertA. (2008). Having the right stuff: Investigating what makes a highly effective outdoor leader. In YoungA. B.SibthorpJ., (Eds.) Abstracts from the Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Ninth Biennial Research Symposium (pp. 30–32). Cortland, NY: Coalition for Education in the Outdoors.
23.
JarvenpaaS. L.KnollK.LeidnerD. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.
24.
JordanD. (1991). In the eye of the beholder: Perceptions of female and male outdoor leaders. Leisure Studies, 10, 235–245.
25.
KawakamiC.WhiteJ. B.LangerE. J. (2000). Mindful and masculine: Freeing women leaders from the constraints of gender roles. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 49–63.
26.
KorsgaardM. A.BrodtS. E.WhitenerE. M. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 312–319.
27.
KramerR. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.
28.
KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
LaisG. (2001). Accessible adventure: Leadership techniques that facilitate full participation by all. Taproot, 13(1), 3–10.
30.
LordR. G.MaherK. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Cambridge, MA: Unwin Hyman.
31.
LudwickR.WrightM. E.ZellerR. A.DowdingD. W.LauderW.WinchellJ. (2004). An improved methodology for advancing nursing research: Factorial surveys. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 224–238.
32.
LudwickR.ZellerR. A. (2001). The factorial survey: An experimental method to replicate real world problems. Nursing Research, 50(2), 129–133.
33.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(10), 123–136.
35.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanD. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
36.
MayerR. C.GavinM. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888.
37.
McKnightD. H.ChoudhuryV.KacmarC. (2002). Developing and validation trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–259.
38.
McKnightD. H.CummingsL. L.ChervanyN. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–491.
39.
NyeJ. L.SimonettaL. G. (1996). Followers' perceptions of group leaders: The impact of recognition-based and inference-based processes. In NyeJ. L.BrowerA. M., (Eds.) What's social about social cognition: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 124–153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
PriestS. (1998). Physical challenge and the development of trust through corporate adventure training. Journal of Experiential Education, 21(1), 31–34.
41.
PriestS.GassM. A. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
42.
RauchW. A.SchweizerK.MoosbruggerH. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607.
43.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651–665.
44.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.BridgesM. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.
45.
SchumannS.PaisleyK.SibthorpJ.GookinJ. (2009). Instructor Influences on student learning at NOLS. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 1(1), 15–37.
46.
SeamanJ.CoppensA. D. (2006). Repertoire of practice: Reconceptualizing instructor competency in contemporary adventure education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 6(1), 25–37. doi:10.1080/14729670685200721.
47.
ShooterW.GallowayS. (2010). Factorial surveys in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(4), 641–652.
48.
ShooterW.PaisleyK.SibthorpJ. (2010). Trust development in outdoor leadership. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 189–207.
49.
ShooterW.SibthorpJ.GookinJ. (2010). The importance of trust in outdoor education: Exploring the relationship between trust in outdoor leaders and developmental outcomes. Research in Outdoor Education, 10, 48–56.
50.
ShooterW.SibthorpJ.PaisleyK. (2009). Outdoor leadership skills: A program perspective. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(1), 1–13.
51.
SnidermanP. M.GrobD. B. (1996). Innovation in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377–399.
52.
SutherlandS. L. (2001). Don't judge a book by its cover: A close look at inclusive adventure education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus.
53.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
54.
VenneS. A.LagunaP.WalkS.RavizzaK. (2006). Optimism levels among collegiate athletes and non-athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(2), 182–195.
55.
WitmanJ. P. (1987). The efficacy of adventure programming in the development of cooperation and trust with adolescents in treatment. Physician and Sports Medicine, 15(7), 22–29.
56.
WittmerC. R. (2001). Leadership and gender-role congruency: A guide for wilderness and outdoor practitioners. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(3), 173–178.
57.
WolfeB. D.SamdahlD. M. (2005). Challenging assumptions: Examining fundamental beliefs that shape challenge course programming and research. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 25–43.
