We conducted a pretest-posttest study using measures of higher order thinking skills (HOTS), and lower order thinking skills (LOTS) in six 12th-grade American Government classrooms taught by three experienced teachers over one semester. One of the three teachers implemented a curriculum in two classes based on experiential education (EE) principles with guidance from the investigators. Students in the EE-emphasized classes demonstrated greater gains in HOTS than the students in the other four classes. There was no difference between the two groups in gains for LOTS. These results suggest that EE instruction in high school classes can promote HOTS more than traditional instruction does with no sacrifice in LOTS.
BaronJ. (1993). Why teach thinking? An essay. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 191–214.
5.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
ChudowskyN.PellegrinoJ. W. (2003). Large-scale assessments that support learning: What will it take?Theory into Practice, 42, 75–83.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 42, 75–83.
10.
DeweyJ. (1933/1998). How we think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
DoriY.TalR. T.TsaushuM. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies—Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?Science Education, 87, 767–793.
12.
DruianG.OwensT.OwensS. (1980). Experiential education: A search for common roots. Journal of Experiential Education, 3, 5–10.
13.
EwertA. (1987). Research in experiential education: An overview. Journal of Experiential Education, 10, 4–7.
14.
GoodenowC. (1992, April). School motivation, engagement, and sense of belonging among urban adolescent students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15.
GranelloD. H.Underfer-BabalisJ. (2004). Supervision of group work: A model to increase supervisee cognitive complexity. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 29, 159–173.
16.
GrantS. G.GradwellJ. M.LauricellaA. M.Derme-InsinnaA.PullanoL.TzetzoK. (2002). When increasing stakes need not mean increasing standards: The case of the New York state global history and geography exam. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30, 488–515.
17.
GrossenB. (1991). The fundamental skills of higher order thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 343–353.
18.
HedinD. (1983). The impact of experience on academic learning: A summary of theories and review of recent research. IRE Report No. 9 ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED250356.
19.
HillocksJ. G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Institute of Educational Sciences. (2004). Cognition and student learning research grants: CFDA 84.305H. Washington, DC.
21.
IvesB. (2003). Effect size use in studies of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 490–504.
22.
IvieS. D. (1998). Ausebel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thinking skills. High School Journal, 82, 35–42.
23.
JunnJ. (1991). Participation and political knowledge. In CrottyE. (Ed.), Political Participation and American Democracy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
24.
KleinS. P.HamiltonL. S.McCaffreyD. F.StecherB. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Retrieved November 10, 2004, from http:///www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP202/
25.
KornhaberM. L. (2004). Appropriate and inappropriate forms of testing, assessment, and accountability. Educational Policy, 18, 45–70.
26.
KosciulekJ. F. (2003). On critical thinking. Rehabilitation Education, 17, 71–79.
27.
LaneyJ. D. (1989). Experience- and concept-label-type effects on first-graders' learning, retention of economic concepts. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 231–236.
28.
LemingJ. S. (1998). Some critical thoughts about the teaching of critical thinking. The Social Studies, 89, 61–66.
29.
LevineD. U. (1994). Instructional approaches and interventions that can improve the academic performance of African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 46–63.
30.
LinnR. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16.
31.
MarchantG. J. (2004). What is at stake with high stakes testing? A discussion of issues and research. Ohio Journal of Science, 104(2), 2–7.
32.
MartinD. S. (1993). Reasoning skills: A key to literacy for deaf learners. American Annals of the Deaf, 138(2), 82–86.
33.
MathisonS.FreemanM. (2003). Constraining elementary teachers' work: Dilemmas and paradoxes created by state mandated testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 34.
34.
McNeilJ. D. (1990). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foreman.
35.
National Academy of Education. (1997). Assessment in transition: Monitoring the nation's educational progress. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
37.
NeillM. (2003). The dangers of testing. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 43–46.
38.
NewmannF. M.BrykA. S.NagaokaJ. K. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence?Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
39.
NiedelmanM. (1991). Problem solving and transfer. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 322–329.
40.
PenningtonJ. L. (2004). The colonization of literacy education: A story of reading in one elementary school. New York: Peter Lang.
41.
PerkinsD. N.SalomonG. (1988). Teaching to transfer. Educational Leadership, 46, 22–32.
42.
RahmI. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164–184.
43.
ReynoldsA. J. (1991). Effects of an experiment-based physical science program on cognitive outcomes. Journal of Experiential Education, 84, 296–302.
44.
RobertsN. S.YerkesR. (2000). Experiential education research: Where do we go from here?The Journal of Experiential Education, 23, 61–63.
45.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.
46.
SchoenfeldA. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31, 13.
47.
SheltonJ. (2000). A life connected to community: An interview with Jack Shelton. Active Learner: A Foxfire Journal for Teachers, 5(1), 164–184.
48.
SwansonH. L. (2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher order processing. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 331–348.
49.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
50.
TorffB. (2003). Developmental changes in teachers' use of higher order thinking and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 563–569.
51.
WeinbaumA.GregoryL.WilkieA.HirschL.FancsaliC. (1996). Expeditional Learning Outward Bound: Summary report. New York: Academy for Educational Development.
52.
WeissI. R. (1997). The status of science and mathematics teaching in the United States: Comparing teacher views and classroom practice to national standards. ERS Spectrum, 15(3), 34–39.
53.
WentzelK. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066–1078.
54.
ZoharA.DoriY. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145–181.
