Families of full-term and preterm infants were followed throughout the first year of life to examine differences in the amount of stress and support reported over time. The relationship between stress and a) support; and b) the child's developmental status was also examined. Mothers were interviewed at home when infants were 3, 6 and 12 months postnatal age. Mothers of preterms reported significantly more parent and family problems, child problems, formal support and informal support than mothers of full-terms. Child problems decreased significantly between 3 and 12 months. Stress at three months was significantly, negatively related to concurrent measures of formal support. At 6 and 12 months, stress was significantly. negatively related to the amount of support received in the preceding period. At 12 months, stress was also negatively related to the infant's Bayley scores. Results are interpreted in terms of their implications for intervention with families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayley, N. (1969). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development . New York: Psychological Corporation .
2.
Beckman, P.J. (1983). Influence of selected child characteristics on stress in families of handicapped infants. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88(2), 150-156.
3.
Beckman, P.J. (1984). A transactional view of stress in families of handicapped children. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Social connections: Beyond the dyad (pp. 281-298). New York: Plenum.
4.
Beckman-Bell, P. (1981). Child-related stress in families of handicapped children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(3), 45-53.
5.
Bristol, M.M. (1979). Maternal coping with autistic children: The effects of child characteristics and interpersonal supports. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
6.
Bristol, M.M. (1985, April). A series of studies of social support, stress and adaptation in families of developrrlentally disabled children. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
7.
Bristol, M., & Gallagher, J. (1982). A family focus for intervention. In C. Ramey & P. L. Trohanis (Eds.), Finding and educating high-risk and handicapped infants (pp. 137-162). Baltimore: University Park Press.
8.
Bronfenbrenner, U., Avgar, A., & Henderson, C. (1977). An analysis of family stresses and support. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.
9.
Burden, R.L. (1980). Measuring the effects of stress on the mother of handicapped infants : Must depression always follow? Child: Care, Health, and Development, 6, 111-125.
10.
Caputo, D.V., Goldstein, K.M., & Taub, H.B. (1979). The development of prematurely born children through middle childhood. In T. Field, A. Sostek, S. Goldberg & H. Shuman (Eds.), Infants born at risk. New York: Spectrum .
11.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300-313.
12.
Crnic, K.A., Friedrich, W.W., & Greenberg, M.T. (1983). Adaptation of families with mentally retarded children: A model of stress, coping and family ecology . American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88(2), 125-138.
13.
Crnic, K.A., Greenberg, M.T., Ragozin, A.S., Robinson, N.M., & Basham, R.B. (1983). Effects of stress and social support on mothers of premature and full-term infants. Child Development, 54, 209-217. ,
14.
Cummings, S.T. (1976). The impact of the child's deficiency on the father: A study of fathers of mentally retarded and chronically ill children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 46, 246-255.
15.
Farber, B. (1959). Effects of a severely mentally retarded child on family interaction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 24, (No. 71).
16.
Friedrich, W.N., & Friedrich, W.L. (1981). Comparison of psychosocial assets of parents with a handicapped child and their normal controls. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85,551-553.
17.
Gallagher, J.J., Beckman, P., & Cross, A. (1983). Families of handicapped children: Sources of stress and support. Exceptional Children, 50, 10-19.
18.
Haggarty, R.J. (1980). Life stress, illness and social support. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22, 391-400.
19.
Holroyd, J. (1974). The Questionnaire on Resources and Stress: An instrument to measure family response to a handicapped family member. Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 92-94.
20.
Holroyd, J., & McArthur, P. (1976). Mental retardation and stress on the parents: A contrast between Down's syndrome & childhood autism. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 431-436.
21.
Hunt, J.V. (1981). Predicting intellectual disorders in childhood for preterm infants with birthweights below 1501 grams. In S. L. Friedman & M. Sigman (Eds.), Preterm birth and psychological development (pp. 329-351). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Jeffcoate, J.A., Humphrey, M.E., & Lloyd, J.K. (1979). Role perception and response to stress in fathers and mothers following pre-term delivery. Social Science & Medicine, Medical Psychology, & Medical Sociology, 13A, 139-145.
23.
McCubbin, H. (1979). Integrating coping behavior in family stress theory . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(2), 237-244.
24.
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289-302.
25.
Petersen, P. (1984). Effects of moderator variables in reducing stress outcome in mothers of children with handicaps. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 28(4), 337-344.
26.
Rabkin, J.G., & Struening, E.L. (1976). Life events, stress, and illness. Science, 194, 1013-1020.
27.
Siegel, L.S. (1983). Correction for pre-maturity and its consequences for the assessment of the very low birth weight infant. Child Development, 54(5), 1176-1188.
28.
Turnbull, A.P., Brotherson, M.J., & Summers, J.A. (in press). The impact of deinstitutionalization on families: A family systems approach. In R. H. Bruininks (Ed.), Living and learning in the least restrictive environment. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
29.
Unger, D.G., & Powell, D.R. (1980). Supporting families under stress: The role of social networks. Family Relations, 29, 566-574.
