The purpose of this study was to compare conversational patterns between mothers and Down syndrome children with those between mothers and normally developing children. Patterns of maternal interaction with 2- and 3-year-old Down syndrome children and a developmentally matched sample of nonretarded children were analyzed with the turn-taking paradigm developed by Kaye & Charney (1980, 1981). The results of this comparison indicated that mothers of Down syndrome children were more dominant and their children less active communication partners than their normal counterparts. Post hoc analyses suggested that mothers of Down syndrome children may be more directive as a result of their efforts to induce their children to increase their activity level. Implications of these findings for children's language development were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
2.
Bruner, J.S. (1974/75). From communication to language-a psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255-287.
3.
Bruner, J.S. (1983). Child's Talk: Learning to use Language. New York: W. W. Norton.
4.
Bzoch, K.R., & League, R. (1970). The receptive-expressive emergent language scale for the measurement of language skills in infancy. Gainesville, FL: The Tree of Life Press.
5.
Cunningham, C.E., Reuller, E., Blackwell, J.r., & Deck, J. (1981). Behavioral and linguistic development in the interactions of normal and retarded children with their mothers. Child Development, 52, 62-70.
6.
Kaye, K. & Charney, R. (1980). How mothers maintain dialogue with two year olds . In Olson, D. (ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner (pp. 144-162). New York: Norton .
7.
Kaye, K. & Charney, R. (1981). Conversational asymetry between mothers and children . Journal of Child Language, 8, 35-49.
8.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
9.
MacDonald, J.D., Gillette, Y., Bickley, M., & Rodriguez, C. (1984). ECO: Ecological communication system. Columbus, Ohio: The Nisonger Center.
10.
Mahoney, G.J. (1975). An ethological approach to delayed language acquisition . American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 139-148.
11.
Mahoney, G.J. (1983). Communication patterns between mothers and developmentally delayed infants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.
12.
Mahoney, G.J.Finger, I. & Powell, A. (1985). The relationship between maternal behavioral style and the developmental status of mentally retarded infants. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 350-355.
13.
Mahoney, G.J., Glover, A., & Finger, I. (1981). The relationship between sensorimotor development and language development among mentally retarded and nonretarded children . American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 21-27.
14.
Mahoney, G. & Powell, A. (1984). The Transactional Intervention Program: Teacher's Guide. Woodhaven, Michigan: Woodhaven School District.
15.
Mahoney, G.J., Seeley, P. (1976). The role of the social agent in language acquisition: Implications for language intervention. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 8, pp. 57-103). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Mahoney, G. & Snow, K. (1983). The relationship of sensorimotor functioning to children's response to early language training. Mental Retardation , 21, 248-254.
17.
Petersen, G., & Sherrod, K. (1982). Relationship of maternal language to language development and language delay of children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 96, 391-398.
18.
Rondal, J.A. (1978a). Developmental sentence procedure and the delay-difference question of language development of Down's syndrome children. Mental Retardation, 16, 169-171.
19.
Rondal, J. (1978b). Maternal speech to normal and Down's syndrome children matched for mean length of utterance. Monograph of the American Association on Mental Deficiency. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
20.
Shatz, M. (1981). On the mechanism of language acquisition: Can features of the communicative environment account for language acquisition? In L. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 106-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Snow, C. (1977). Mother's speech research: From input to interaction . In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguston (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 1-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Wells, G. (1981). Language as interaction. In Wells, G. (Ed.), Learning through interaction: The study of language development (pp. 3-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
