An alternating treatment design, nested within a withdrawal of treatment, single-subject design was used in this study to examine the differential treatment effects of employing single and multiple peers to promote the social interactions of two handicapped preschoolers. During a baseline phase, few social interactions occurred for the handicapped children. As single and multiple confederate peers (in different intervention sessions) directed social initiations to the handicapped children, the social responses of those handicapped children increased substantially. Spontaneous social initiating also increased, to a lesser extent than social responding, for one of the handicapped children. Social responses decreased for both children during the withdrawal of treatment phase of the study, and increased again during the final intervention phase. Differential treatment results were generally not found. Both types of peer-initiation interventions produced marked increases in the handicapped children's social interactions with nonhandicapped peers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brady, M.P., Shores, R.E., Gunter, P., McEvoy, M.A., Fox, J.J., & White, C. (1984). Generalization of a severely handicapped adolescent's social interaction responses via multiple peers in a classroom setting. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 278-286.
2.
Billingsley, F., White, O.R., & Monson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and example . Behavioral Assessment, 2, 224-241.
3.
Cohen, J. (1969). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
4.
Fein, G.G. (1978). Play revisited. In M. Lamb (Ed.), Social and personality development (pp. 70-90). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
5.
Fox, J.J., Gunter, P., Brady, M.J., Bambara, L.M., Speigel-McGill, P., & Shores, R.E. (in press). Using multiple peer-exemplars to develop generalized social responding of an autistic girl. Monographs in Behavior Disorders .
6.
Guralnick, M.J. (1980). Social interaction among preschool handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 46, 248-253.
7.
Guralnick, M.J. (1981). Peer influences on development of communicative competence. In P. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of peers as behavior change agents (pp. 31-68). New York: Plenum Press.
8.
Guralnick, M.J. (in press). The peer relations of young handicapped and nonhandicapped children. In P. Strain, M. Guralnick, & H. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment, and modifications. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Hartmann, D.P. (1982). Assessing the dependability of observational data . New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 14, 51-65.
10.
Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In M. Heatherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103-196). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
Hendrickson, J.M., Strain, P.S., Tremblay, A., & Shores, R.E. (1982). Interactions of behaviorally handicapped children: Functional effects of peer social initiations. Behavior Modification , 6, 323-352.
12.
Hops, H. (1982). Social skills training for socially withdrawn/isolate children. In P. Karoly and J. Steffin (Eds.), Improving children's competence: Advances in child behavior analysis and therapy (pp. 39-101). Lexington, MA: Heath & Co.
13.
Odom, S.L., Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Strain, P.S. (1985). Increasing handicapped preschoolers' peer social interactions: A cross-setting and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 3-16.
14.
Odom, S.L., Stein, M.L., & Jenkins, J.R. (1983, May). Peer-initiation and individual contingency interventions for pronwting social interactions of handicapped preschool children . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee.
15.
Odom, S.L., & Strain, P.S. (1984). Peer-mediated approaches to increasing children's social interactions: A review. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 54, 544-557.
16.
Peck, C.A., & Cooke, T.P. (1983). Benefits of mainstreaming at the early childhood level: How much can we expect? Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 1-22.
17.
Peterson, N.L. (1982). Social integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: A study of playmate preferences. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2, 56-69.
18.
Peterson, N.L., & Haralick, J.G. (1977). Integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: An analysis of play behavior and social interaction . Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 12, 235-245.
19.
Shafer, M.S., Egel, A.L., & Neef, N.A. (1984). Training mildly handicapped peers to facilitate changes in the social interaction skills of autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 461-476.
20.
Smilansky, S. (1968). The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21.
Snyder, L., Apollini, T., & Cooke, T.P. (1977). Integrated settings at the early childhood level: The role of the nonretarded peers. Exceptional Children, 43, 262-266.
22.
Stokes, T.F., & Baer, D.M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
23.
Strain, P.S., Shores, R.E., & Timm, M.A. (1977). Effects of peer social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 289-298.
24.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
