A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across four early intervention providers was used to examine functional relations between job-embedded professional development (PD), including practice-based coaching (PBC), and providers’ fidelity of implementation of home visiting practices for embedded intervention. Four providers with one to two caregivers and their toddler with disabilities or developmental delays participated. The primary dependent measure was the number of essential home visiting practices providers implemented with fidelity. Results from visual analyses showed a functional relation between job-embedded PD and the number of essential home visiting practices implemented with fidelity for three of four providers. Provider and caregiver social validity data indicated PD and home visiting practices and embedded intervention were appropriate, feasible, and useful. Results provide promising evidence for job-embedded PD, including PBC, to support providers’ fidelity of implementation of home visiting practices for embedded intervention. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
BrownJ. A.WoodsJ. (2015). Effects of a triadic parent-implemented home-based communication intervention for toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115589350
3.
BruderM. B.Mogro-WilsonC.StaytonC. M.DietrichS. L. (2009). The national status of in-service professional development systems for early intervention and early childhood special education practitioners. Infants & Young Children, 22(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000343333.49775.f8
4.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908315563
5.
CarrollC.PattersonM.WoodS.BoothA.RickJ.BalainS. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
6.
ConroyM. A.SutherlandK. S.AlginaJ. J.WilsonR. E.MartinezJ. R.WhalonK. J. (2015). Measuring teacher implementation of the BEST in CLASS intervention program and corollary child outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426614532949
7.
CripeJ. W.VennM. L. (1997). Family-guided routines for early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children, 1(1), 18–26.
8.
DaneA.SchneiderB. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00043-3
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
11.
HalleT.ZaslowM.Martinez-BeckI.MetzA. (2013). Applications of implementation science to early care and education programs and systems: Implications for research, policy and practice. In HalleT.MetzA.Martinez-BeckI. (Eds.), The application of implementation science to early childhood program and systems. Brookes Publishing.
12.
HarveyM. T.MayM. E.KennedyC. H. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the elevation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000044735.51022.5d
13.
HelmyY. A.FawzyM.ElaswadA.SobiehA.KenneyS. P.ShehataA. A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review of taxonomy, genetics, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(4), 1225–1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041225
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education and Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C § 1400 (2004).
15.
KashinathS.WoodsJ.GoldsteinH. (2006). Enhancing generalized teaching strategy use in daily routines by parents of children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(3), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/036)
16.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.
17.
Krick ObornK. M.JohnsonL. D. (2015). Coaching via electronic performance feedback to support home visitors’ use of caregiver coaching strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415592411
18.
KyzarK. B.ChiuC.KempP.AlderseyH. M.TurnbullA. P.LindemanD. P. (2014). Feasibility of an online professional development program for early intervention practitioners. Infants & Young Children, 27(2), 174–191.
19.
LaBrotZ. C.JohnsonC.MaximeE.CatoT.ButtS.DeFouwE. R. (2022). Emailed prompt package to promote maintenance and generalization of early childhood educators’ behavior specific praise. Journal of Behavioral Education, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09475-4
20.
LorioC.RomanoM.WoodsJ.BrownJ. (2020). A review of problem solving and reflection as caregiver coaching strategies in early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 33(1), 35–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000156
21.
McLeodB. D.SutherlandK. S.MartinezR. G.ConroyM. A.SnyderP. A.Southam-GerowM. A. (2017). Common practice elements to improve social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes of young children in early childhood classrooms. Prevention Science, 18(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0703-y
22.
MeadanH.SnodgrassM. R.MeyerL. E.FisherK. W.ChungM. Y.HalleJ. W. (2016). Internet-based parent-implemented intervention for young children with autism: A pilot study. Journal of Early Intervention, 38(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116630327
23.
MetzA.NaoomS. F.HalleT.BartleyL. (2015). An integrated stage-based framework for implementation of early childhood programs and systems (OPRE Research Brief). Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
24.
MobayedK. L.CollinsB. C.StrangisD. E.SchusterJ. W.HemmeterM. L. (2000). Teaching parents to employ mand-model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151000230030601
RaverS. A.ChildressD. C. (2015). Family-centered early intervention: Supporting infants and toddlers in natural environments. Brookes Publishing.
27.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2022). Overview of practice-based coaching. In SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (Eds.), Essentials of practice-based coaching: Supporting effective practices in early childhood (pp. 1–20). Brookes Publishing.
28.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.McLeanM.SandallS.McLaughlinT.AlginaJ. (2018). Effects of professional development on preschool teachers’ use of embedded instruction practices. Exceptional Children, 84, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917735512
29.
SnyderP. A.RakapS.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT. W.SandallS.McLeanM. E. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115595461
30.
TomenyK. R.Garcia-GrauP.McWilliamR. A. (2021). Early interventionist’s rating of family-centered practices in natural environments. Infants & Young Children, 34(4), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000203
31.
TomenyK. R.McWilliamR. A.TomenyT. S. (2020). Caregiver-implemented intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of coaching components. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 7, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00186-7
32.
University of Florida & Florida State University. (2020). Florida embedded practices and intervention with caregivers home visiting practices fidelity checklist [Manual and checklist]. Unpublished instrument.
33.
WetherbyA. M.GuthrieW.WoodsJ.SchatschneiderC.HollandR. D.MorganL.LordC. (2014). Parent-implemented social intervention for toddlers with autism: An RCT. Pediatrics, 134(6), 1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0757
34.
WetherbyA. M.WoodsJ. J. (2006). Early social interaction project for children with autism spectrum disorders beginning in the second year of life: A preliminary study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214060260020201
35.
WindsorK. S.WoodsJ.KaiserA. P.SnyderP.SalisburyC. (2019). Caregiver-implemented intervention for communication and motor outcomes for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418815250
36.
WoodsJ.KashinathS.GoldsteinH. (2004). Effects of embedding caregiver-implemented teaching strategies in daily routines on children’s communication outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 26(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510402600302
37.
WoodsJ.SnyderP.SalisburyC. (2018). Embedded Practices and Intervention with Caregivers (EPIC): Linking instruction and family capacity-building recommended practices. In SnyderP.HemmeterM. L. (Eds.), DEC recommended practices monograph series No. 4: Instruction (pp. 145–159). Council for Exceptional Children.
38.
WrightC. A.KaiserA. P. (2017). Teaching parents enhanced milieu teaching with words and signs using the teach-model-coach-review model. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(4), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415621027
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
