Ongoing expansion of early education services in the United States is often rooted in these programs’ contribution to development that promotes later academic and behavioral competence. Multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS, sometimes referred to as Response to Intervention) represent one increasingly common resource to promote desired outcomes for all children. MTSS requires seasonal screening of all students and progress monitoring of those selected for more intensive intervention. This study explores development and evaluation of measures for these uses, designed specifically to assess the language and early literacy development of 3-year-old children. Results from assessment of 449 children describe measure reliability, growth across three seasonal screenings, development of criterion-referenced benchmarks, and variations in growth for children at different levels of initial performance. Results are discussed in terms of normative versus criterion-referenced standards for building MTSS assessment systems as well as future directions for research, policy, and practice.
Afton Partners. (2019). The state of early childhood education funding in America. Afton Partners.
2.
AlbrittonK.StuckeyA.Patton TerryN. (2022). Multitiered early literacy identification in 3-year-old children in head start settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 44(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121998434
3.
AzerS.MorganG. (2002). Regulation of child care. Early Childhood Research and Policy Briefs, 2(1), 1–7.
4.
BarnettW. S.FredeE. C. (2011). Preschool education’s effects on language and literacy. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 435–450). Guilford.
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
6.
Bipartisan Policy Center. (2018). Early childhood initiative: Creating an integrated efficient early care and education system to support children and families: A state-by-state analysis. Bipartisan Policy Center.
BradfieldT. A.BesnerA. C.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.AlbanoA. D.RodriguezM. C.McConnellS. R. (2014). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Oral language. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(4), 233–244.
9.
BradfieldT. A.McConnellS.Wackerle-HollmanA. (2014, February). Confident decision-making: Validation of an early childhood response to intervention decision-making framework [Poster presentation]. Conference for Research Innovation in Early Intervention, San Diego, CA, United States.
10.
CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R.GoldsteinH.McConnellS. R.KaminskiR.BradfieldT. A.Wackerle-HollmanA.LinasM.GuerreroG.KelleyE.AtwaterJ. (2016). Advances in multi-tiered systems of support for prekindergarten children: Lessons learned from 5 years of research and development from the center for response to intervention in early childhood. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 587–606). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_33
11.
CartaJ. J.MillerR. (Eds.). (2019). Multi-tiered systems of support for young children: A guide to response to intervention in early education. Paul H. Brookes.
12.
CizekG. J.BunchM. B. (Eds.). (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Sage.
13.
Cohen-VogelL.LittleM.JangW.BurchinalM.Bratsch-HinesM. (2021). A missed opportunity? Instructional content redundancy in pre-K and kindergarten. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110061. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211006163
14.
DenoS. L. (1997). Whether thou goest . . . Perspectives on progress monitoring. In LloydJ. W.KameenuiE. J.ChardD. (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77–99). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DickinsonD. K.NeumanS. B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). Guilford.
17.
DickinsonD. K.PorcheM. V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82(3), 870–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01576.x
18.
DodgeD. T.ColkerL. J.HeromanC.BickartT. S. (2002). The creative curriculum for preschool. Teaching Strategies.
19.
DunnL. M.DunnD. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-IV) (3rd ed.). Pearson.
20.
DuránL. K.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.KohlmeierT. L.BrunnerS. K.PalmaJ.CallardC. H. (2019). Individual growth and development indicators-Español: Innovation in the development of Spanish oral language general outcome measures. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 48, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.02.001
21.
FernaldA.WeislederA. (2011). Early language experience is vital to developing fluency in understanding. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 3–19). Guilford.
22.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.
23.
GolinkoffR. M.de VilliersJ.Hirsh-PasekK. A.IglesiasA.WilsonM. S. (n.d.). Quick interactive language screener (QUILS): A measure of vocabulary, syntax, and language acquisition skills in young children. Paul H. Brookes.
24.
GoswaniU. (2001). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 111–125). Guilford.
25.
GreenwoodC. R.CartaJ. J.AtwaterJ.GoldsteinH.KaminskiR.McConnellS. R. (2012). Is a response to intervention (RTI) approach to preschool language and early literacy instruction needed?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121412455438
26.
HartB.RisleyT. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Paul Brookes.
KeilyT.EvansA.AtchisonB. (2019). Strengthening the early childhood education continuum. Policy guide. Education Commission of the States.
29.
KellyJ. A. (1980). The simultaneous replication design: The use of a multiple baseline to establish experimental control in single group social skills treatment studies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11, 203–207.
30.
LeaseE. M.AlbanoA. D.WillK. K.ElmquistM.McConnellS. R.Wackerle-HollmanA. K. (2021). Preliminary results, criterion validity analysis expanding individual growth & development indicators of language and early literacy for universal screening in multi-tiered systems of support with three-year-olds (IGDILab Technical Report). University of Minnesota.
LoniganC. J.BurgessS. R.AnthonyJ. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596–613. https://doi.org/10.1037//OOI2-1649.36.5.596
33.
LoniganC. J.BurgessS. R.AnthonyJ. L.BarkerT. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 294–311.
34.
LoniganC. J.WagnerR. K.TorgesonJ. K. (2007). Test of preschool early literacy (TOPEL). Pro-Ed.
35.
McConnellS. R. (2019). The path forward for multi-tiered systems of support in early education. In CartaJ. J.MillerR. (Eds.), Multi-tiered systems of support for young children: A guide to response to intervention in early education (pp. 253–267). Paul H Brookes.
36.
McConnellS. R.LeaseE. M.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.AlbanoA. D.SchardtA.ShusterK.CaiL. (2021). Testing initial items for alphabet knowledge, phonological awareness, and oral language for three-year-old children: Report of phase 2 results (Technical Report No. 6; Expanding Individual Growth & Development Indicators of Language and Early Literacy for Universal Screening in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support with Three-Year-Olds). IGDILab, University of Minnesota.
37.
McConnellS. R.Wackerle-HollmanA. K. (2016). Can we measure the transition to reading? General outcome measures and early literacy development from preschool to early elementary grades. AERA Open, 2(3), 233285841665375. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416653756
38.
McConnellS. R.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.AlbanoA. D.LeaseE. M.ElmquistM.WillK. K. (2019). Individual growth & development indicators (IGDIs), language and early literacy: Age 3 (IGDILab Technical Reports) [Unpublished measurement system]. University of Minnesota.
39.
McConnellS. R.Wackerle-HollmanA. K.RoloffT. A. B.RodriguezM. (2015). Designing a measurement framework for response to intervention in early childhood programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(4), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115578559
40.
MolfeseV.WestbergL., & National Early Literacy Panel. (2009). Impact of preschool and kindergarten programs on young children’s early literacy skills. In PanelN. E. L. (Ed.), Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel—A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. National Institute for Literacy.
41.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel—A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. National Institute for Literacy.
42.
NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1). Guilford.
43.
PiastaS. B.LoganJ. A. R.FarleyK. S.StrangT. M.JusticeL. M. (2021). Profiles and predictors of children’s growth in alphabet knowledge. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 27, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2021.1871617
44.
PiastaS. B.WagnerR. K. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.1.2
45.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team.
46.
RodriguezM. C. (2010). Building a validity framework for second-generation IGDIs. Technical Reports of the Center for Response to Intervention in Early Childhood.
47.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and other promising predictors. In ShapiroB.KAccardoP. J.CaputeA. J. (Ed.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 77–121). York Press.
48.
ScarboroughH. S.DobrichW.HagerM. (1991). Preschool literacy experience and later reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(8), 508–511.
49.
SchumackerR. E.SmithE. V.Jr. (2007). Reliability: A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 394–409.
ShusterK.SchardtA.McConnellS. R. (2017). Results of pilot testing eight formats for assessing language and early literacy in young children (Technical Report 5; Expanding Individual Growth & Development Indicators of Language and Early Literacy for Universal Screening in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support with Three-Year-Olds). University of Minnesota.
52.
TraubR. E.RowleyG. L. (1991). Understanding reliability: An NCME instructional module on. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00183.x
53.
Wackerle-HollmanA. K.DuránL. K.MirandaA. (2020). Early literacy skill growth in Spanish-speaking children with and at risk for disabilities in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121420906469
54.
Wackerle-HollmanA. K.RodriguezM. I.BradfieldT. A.RodriguezM. C.McConnellS. R. (2015). Development of early measures of comprehension: Innovation in individual growth and development indicators. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508414551404
55.
Wackerle-HollmanA. K.SchmittB. A.BradfieldT. A.RodriguezM. C.McConnellS. R. (2015). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Phonological awareness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 495–510.
56.
WangQ.RodriguezM. C.Wackerle-HollmanA.McConnellS. R. (2017). IGDI-APEL computer adaptive test program manual [Unpublished Technical Report]. IGDILab, University of Minnesota.
57.
WhitehurstG. J.LoniganC. J. (2010). Get ready to read! Revised. Pearson.
58.
WilsonM. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
