Although Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) has been used in schools, its success has prompted recommendations for its adoption in group home and day habilitation settings. This scoping review examines the literature on implementing MTSS in group home and day habilitation settings for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Of the 15 studies reviewed, most focused on Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) rather than a comprehensive MTSS framework, raising questions about the alignment of interventions with the three-tiered structure of MTSS. Additionally, PBIS in these settings appears restricted to an individualized approach to minimizing behavior instead of the comprehensive framework used in schools. Benefits of implementing PBIS include a reduction in challenging behavior, decreased use of restrictive interventions, and staff-related advantages such as improved organization and reduced turnover. Challenges are noted in time and resource constraints. Suggestions for implementing MTSS in residential and day habilitation settings are provided.
BallardSCBenderSL (2022) A systematic review of social, emotional, and behavioral interventions and outcomes for students in alternative education. Preventing School Failure, 66(2): 136–149.
3.
BirdFLLuiselliJK (2000) Positive behavioral support of adults with developmental disabilities: assessment of long-term adjustment and habilitation following restrictive treatment histories. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 31(1): 5–19.
4.
BoscoAPaulauskaiteLHallICrabtreeJSoniSBiswasACooperVPoppeMKingMStrydomACrawfordMJHassiotisA (2019) Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of PBS-based staff training for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability. PloS One, 14(8): e0221507.
5.
BramerWMde JongeGBRethlefsenMLMastFKleijnenJ (2018) A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4): 531–541.
BradshawCPLindstrom JohnsonSZhuYPasET (2020) Scaling up behavioral health promotion efforts in Maryland: The economic benefit of positive behavioral interventions and supports. School Psychology Review, 50(1): 99–109.
8.
BruinsmaEHoofdakkerBJHoekstraPJKuijperGMBildtAA (2024) Effects of positive behaviour support delivered by direct staff on challenging behaviours and quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities: A multicentre cluster-controlled trial. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 37(1): e13164-n/a. DOI: 10.1111/jar.13164.
9.
CarrEGDunlapGHornerRHKoegelRLTurnbullAPSailorWAndersonJLAlbinRWKoegelLKFoxL (2002) Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1): 4–16.
10.
D’AmatoRCZafirisCMcConnellEDeanRS (2011) The history of school psychology: Understanding the past to not repeat it. In: BrayMAKehleTJ (eds). The Oxford handbook of school psychology. Oxford University Press, 9–46.
DunlapGCarrEGHornerRHZarconeJRSchwartzI (2008) Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis: a familial alliance. Behavior Modification, 32(5): 682–698.
13.
EagleJWDowd-EagleSESnyderAHoltzmanEG (2015) Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Collaboration between school psychologists and administrators to promote systems-level change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(2-3): 160–177.
14.
FaganTKWisePS (2000) School psychology: Past, present and future. National Association of School Psychologists.
15.
FeldmanMACondillacRAToughSHuntSGriffithsD (2002) Effectiveness of community positive behavioral intervention for persons with developmental disabilities and severe behavior disorders. Behavior Therapy, 33(3): 377–398.
16.
GerkenLBaumgartnerLM (2023) Do they even need “adult” education? A programming critique of day habilitation. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 35(1): 51–55.
17.
GoforthANFarmerRLKimSYNaserSCLockwoodABAffruntiN (2021) Status of school psychology in 2020: Part 1, Demographics of the NASP membership survey. NASP Research Reports, 5(2): 1–17.
18.
GriffithsADiamondELAlsipJFurlongMMorrisonGDoB (2019) School-wide implementation of positive behavioral interventions and supports in an alternative school setting: A case study. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(6): 1493–1513.
19.
HassiotisAPoppeMStrydomAVickerstaffVHallISCrabtreeJOmarRZKingMHunterRBiswasACooperVHowieWCrawfordMJ (2018) Clinical outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support to reduce challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 212(3): 161–168.
20.
HassiotisAStrydomACrawfordMHallIOmarRVickerstaffVHunterRCrabtreeJCooperVBiswasAHowieWKingM (2014) Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for treating challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1): 219.
JolivetteKScheuermannBEnnisRP (2015) Multi-tiered systems of support within secure residential juvenile facilities. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 32(4): 254–257.
26.
JolivetteKSpragueJRSwoszowskiNCMcIntoshKSandersS (2020) FW-PBIS framework implementation and facility climate perspectives through the lens of youth in secure juvenile facilities: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 41(2): 99–110.
27.
KincaidDDunlapGKernLLaneKLBambaraLMBrownFFoxLKnosterTP (2016) Positive behavior support: A proposal for updating and refining the definition. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2): 69–73.
28.
KincaidDPeshak GeorgeHChildsK (2006) Review of the positive behavior support training curriculum: Supervisory and direct support editions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(3): 183–188.
29.
LampronSGonsoulinS (2013). PBIS in restrictive settings: The time is now. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(3): 161–174.
30.
LindstromJSAlfonsoYNPasETDebnamKJBradshawCP (2020) Scaling up positive behavioral interventions and supports: Costs and their distribution across state, districts, and schools. School Psychology Review, 49(4): 399–414.
31.
LunskyYJahodaANavasPCampanellaSHavercampSM (2022) The mental health and well‐being of adults with intellectual disability during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A narrative review. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(1): 35–47.
32.
MacDonaldAMcGillPMurphyG (2018) An evaluation of staff training in positive behavioural support. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(6): 1046–1061.
33.
MacDonaldAMcGillP (2013) Outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(1): 17–33.
34.
MakSThomasA (2022) Steps for conducting a scoping review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(5): 565–566.
35.
McCleanBGreyI (2012) A component analysis of positive behaviour support plans. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 37(3): 221–231.
36.
McGillPVanonoLCloverWSmythECooperVHopkinsLBarrattNJoyceCHendersonKSekasiSDavisSDeveauR (2018) Reducing challenging behaviour of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation: A cluster randomized controlled trial of setting-wide positive behaviour support. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 81: 143–154.
37.
MinkosMLWinterELTrudelSM (2023) Adaptation of universal behavioral supports within an alternative education setting. The Journal of Special Education, 57(2):118–128.
38.
MordockJB (1988) The school psychologist working in residential and day treatment centers. School Psychology Review, 17(3): 421–428.
39.
MorrisKRHornerRH (2016) Positive behavior support. In: SinghN. (Ed.), Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilitiesNew York: Springer, pp. 415–441.
National Association of School Psychologists (2020) The professional standards of the National Association of School Psychologists. Available at: https://www.nasponline.org/standards-and-certification (accessed 10 December 2023).
PetersMDGodfreyCMKhalilHMcInerneyPParkerDSoaresCB (2015) Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3): 141–146.
44.
PinkelmanSEMcIntoshKRasplicaCKBergTStrickland-CohenMK (2015) Perceived enablers and barriers related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Behavioral Disorders, 40(3): 171–183.
45.
ReidDHRotholzDAParsonsMBMorrisLBraswellBAGreenCWSchellRM (2003) Training human service supervisors in aspects of PBS: Evaluation of a statewide, performance-based program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(1): 35–46.
46.
SchafferGE (2023) Multi-tiered systems of support: A practical guide to preventative practice. Thousan Oaks: Sage Publishing.
47.
SchafferGEPowerEMFiskAKTrolianTLCastilloJM (2024) Evaluating the Practices and Tasks of School Psychologists in School and Non-School Settings. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 40(2): 106–131.
48.
ScheuermannBTurnerMMcCordVMerrellS (2023) Feasibility of PBIS in a therapeutic group home. Available at: www.pbis.org (accessed 10 December 2023).
49.
SinghNNLancioniGEKarazsiaBTMyersRE (2016) Caregiver training in mindfulness-based positive behavior supports (MBPBS): Effects on caregivers and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 98.
50.
SinghNNLancioniGEKarazsiaBTMyersREWintonASWLathamLLNugentK (2015) Effects of training staff in MBPBS on the use of physical restraints, staff stress and turnover, staff and peer injuries, and cost-effectiveness in developmental disabilities. Mindfulness, 6(4): 926–937.
51.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJBLöweB (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10): 1092–1097.
52.
StrydomcABoscoAVickerstaffVHunterRHassiotisA (2020) Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in the delivery of Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for adults with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and challenging behaviour - randomised trial. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1): 161.
53.
TeymooriAGorbunovaAHaghishFERealRZeldovichMWuYJPolinderSAsendorfTMenonDCenter-Tbi Investigators and Participants, SteinbüchelN (2020) Factorial structure and validity of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) scales after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(3): 1–21.
54.
ThurlowMLGhereGLazarusSSLiuKK (2020) MTSS for all: Including students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. Available at: https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/NCEOBriefMTSS.pdf (accessed 10 December 2023).
55.
TriccoACLillieEZarinWO’BrienKColquhounHKastnerMLevacDNgCSharpeJPWilsonKKennyMWarrenRWilsonCStelfoxHTStrausSE (2016) A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(15): 1–10.
56.
TriccoACLillieEZarinWO’BrienKKColquhounHLevacDMoherDPetersMDJHorsleyTWeeksLHempelSAklEAChangCMcGowanJStewartLHartlingLAldcroftAWilsonMGGarrittyCStrausSE (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7): 467–473.
57.
WestmoreMRAndersonKA (2024) Adult day services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review. Family and Community Health, 47(3): 209–218.
58.
WexlerD (2018) School-based multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS): An introduction to MTSS for neuropsychologists. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7(4): 306–316.
