The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of email-delivered performance feedback to teachers working in inclusive early childhood classrooms. A concurrent multiple probe across-participants design was used to examine the relation between performance feedback delivered via email and teachers’ use of play expansions. Results indicated that email was an effective method for delivering performance feedback, subsequently increasing teachers’ use of play expansions when individualized to meet the needs of teachers; however, the complexity of children’s play behaviors did not increase.
Artman-MeekerK. M.HemmeterM. L. (2013). Effects of training and feedback on teachers’ use of classroom preventive practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121412447115
2.
BartonE. E. (2010). Development of a taxonomy of pretend play for children with disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 23(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0b013e3181f22072
3.
BartonE. E. (2015). Teaching generalized pretend play and related behaviors to young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563694
4.
BartonE. E. (2016). Critical issues and promising practices for teaching play to young children with disabilities. In ReichowB.BoydB.BartonE. E.OdomS. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 267–286). Springer.
5.
BartonE. E.ChoiG.MauldinE. G. (2019). Teaching sequences of pretend play to young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 41(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118799466
6.
BartonE. E.FullerE. A.SchnitzA. (2016). The use of email to coach preservice early childhood teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415612728
7.
BartonE. E.GossettS.WatersM. C.MurrayR. E.FrancisR. N. (2019). Increasing play complexity in a young child with autism. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618800493
8.
BartonE. E.MurrayR.O’FlahertyC.SweeneyE.GossettS. (2020). Teaching object play to young children with autism and other disabilities: A systematic review of methods and rigor. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 125(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-125.1.14
9.
BartonE. E.PribbleL.ChenC. I. (2013). The use of e-mail to deliver performance-based feedback to early childhood practitioners. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(3), 270–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815114544543
10.
BartonE. E.LloydB. P.SpriggsA. D.GastD. (2018). Visual analysis of graphic data. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.) Single case research in behavioral sciences, 3rd edition (pp. 179–214). Routledge Publishers.
11.
BartonE. E.RigorM. N.PokorskiE. A.VelezM.DomingoM. (2019). Using text messaging to deliver performance feedback to preservice teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418800016
12.
BartonE. E.WoleryM. (2010). Training teachers to promote pretend play in young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007700104
13.
BelskyJ.MostR. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.5.630
14.
CaseyA. M.McWilliamR. A. (2008). Graphical feedback to increase teachers’ use of incidental teaching. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815108319038
15.
CoogleC. G.RahnN. L.OttleyJ. R. (2015). Pre-service teacher use of communication strategies upon receiving immediate feedback. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32(3), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.03.003
16.
CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2017). Null effects and publication bias in special education research. Behavioral Disorders, 42(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917709473
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551738
19.
FreyJ. R.KaiserA. P. (2011). The use of play expansions to increase the diversity and complexity of object play in young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410378758
20.
GastD. L.LlyodB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ.GastD. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 239–282). Routledge.
21.
GinsburgK. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2697
22.
HemmeterM. L.SnyderP.KinderK.ArtmanK. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.004
23.
IngersollB.SchreibmanL. (2006). Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0089-y
24.
KaiserA. P.HancockT. B.NietfeldJ. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11(4), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1104_4
25.
KaiserA. P.TrentJ. A. (2007). Communication intervention for young children with disabilities: Naturalistic approaches to promoting development. In BlacherJ.OdomS. L.HornerR. H.SnellM. E. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 224–245). Guilford.
26.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Prentice Hall.
27.
KongN. Y.CartaJ. J. (2013). Responsive interaction interventions for children with or at risk for developmental delays: A research synthesis. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411426486
28.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
29.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2018). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology. Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 97–131). Routledge.
30.
LifterK.MasonE. J.BartonE. E. (2011). Children’s play: Where we have been and where we could go. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111429465
31.
McConnellS. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020537805154
32.
MorrisonR. S.SainatoD. M.BenchaabanD.EndoS. (2002). Increasing play skills of children with autism using activity schedules and correspondence training. Journal of Early Intervention, 25(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510202500106
33.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. Author.
34.
O’FlahertyC.BartonE. E.WinchesterC.DomingoM. (2019). Coaching teachers to promote social interactions with toddlers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719851794
35.
PartenM. B. (1932). Social participation among pre-school children. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27(5), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915435.n15
36.
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratochwillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.308
37.
SigmanM.RuskinE.ArbelleS.CoronaR.DissanayakeC.EspinosaM.RobinsonB. F. (1999). Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, down syndrome, and developmental delays. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64(1), 1–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3181510
38.
SimonsenB.MyersD.DeLucaC. (2010). Teaching teachers to use prompts, opportunities to respond, and specific praise. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409359905
TincaniM.TraversJ. (2018). Publishing single-case research design studies that do not demonstrate experimental control. Remedial and Special Education, 39(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517697447
41.
WongC. S.KasariC.FreemanS.PaparellaT. (2007). The acquisition and generalization of joint attention and symbolic play skills in young children with autism. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.32.2.101
42.
WrightC. A.KaiserA. P.ReikowskyD. I.RobertsM. Y. (2013). Effects of a naturalistic sign intervention on expressive language of toddlers with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(3), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0060)
