Preschool programs for children with and without disabilities housed in public school settings have increased dramatically over the last decade. This study examined the perspectives of preschool teachers about who provides instructional supervision for their preschool programs and the behaviors these individuals use to influence their instructional practices. A questionnaire employing Critical Incident Technique was distributed to all preschool teachers housed in public school buildings in one state. Results from this investigation suggest that preschool coordinators and principals are identified most often as instructional supervisors. Five themes were identified that facilitated classroom instruction: support for the preschool classroom and staff, professional development opportunities and strategies, presence in the classroom and program, offering praise to teachers and staff, and overall knowledge of early childhood development. Teachers indicated that instructional leaders influenced their instructional practices through both verbal and nonverbal interactions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers' perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349-379.
2.
Blase, J. & Blase, J.R. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Boyatzis, C. (1998). A collaborative assignment on the role of culture in child development and education. Teaching of Psychology , 25 (3), 195-198.
6.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Clifford, R.M., Early, D.M. & Hills, T. (1999). Almost a million children in school before kindergarten: Who is responsible for early childhood services?Young Children54(5), 48-51.
8.
Deal, T.E. & Peterson, K.D. (1991). The principal's role in shaping school culture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement .
9.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method . New York: John Wiley & Sons .
10.
Flannagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin,51, 327-358.
11.
Fredericks, J. (1992). Ongoing principal development. Education and Urban Society25, 57-73.
12.
Good Start Grow Smart (2002). The Bush administration's early childhood initiative. Retrieved February 17, 2003, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/earlychildhood/toc.html
13.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
14.
Holland, P.E. (1989). Implicit assumptions about the supervisory conference: A review and analysis of literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4, 362-379.
15.
Hoyle, J.R., Fenwick, W.E. & Steffy, B.E. (1985). Skills for successful school leaders. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrator s.
16.
Johnson, J.P., Livingston, M., Schwartz, R.A., & Slate, J.R. (2000). What makes a good elementary school? A critical examination. Journal of Educational Research, 93 (6), 339-349.
17.
Jorde-Bloom, P. (2000). How do we define director competence?Child Care Information Exchange3, 13-18.
18.
Katz, L. (1997). Pedagogical leadership. In S.L. Kagan & B. Bowman (Eds.) Leadership in early care and education. Washington, DC : National Association for the Education of Young Children .
19.
Kagan, S.L. & Bowman, B. (1997). Leadership in early care and education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
20.
Kentucky Department of Education (September, 2000). 1999-2000 Kentucky preschool program: Response to data request from the office of educational accountability. Frankfort, KY: Author.
21.
Klein, D.M. & White, J.M. (1996). Family theories: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
Lund, I.A., Rous, B.S., Moffett, C.L., Wood, K., & O'Keefe, H. (2002). A national survey on the state of the states: Preschool standards & accountability (Tech. Rep. No.1). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute.
23.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
24.
National Association of Elementary School Principals (2001). Profiling the principalship [On-line]. Retrieved July 5, 2001, from http://www.naesp.org/prinpro.htm
25.
No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Public law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 [On-line] . U.S. Department of Education: Author. Retrieved December 23, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/index.html
Red Feather Institute for Advanced Studies in Sociology (1998). Critical dimensions in social psychology: Assumptions of symbolic interactional theory [On-line]. Retrieved July 7, 2001, from http://www.tryoung.com/CRITDRAM/ASSUMPTION-SIT.htm
28.
Reitzug, U.C. (1997). Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12(4), 356-366.
29.
Richards, T.J. & Richards, L. (1994). Using computers in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 445-462). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
Rodd, J. (1996). Towards a typology of leadership for the early childhood professional of the 21st century. Early Childhood Development and Care, 120, 119-126.
31.
Sandall, S., McLean, M.E., & Smith, B.J. (Eds.). (2000). DEC recommended practices in early interventionlearly childhood special education. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
32.
Schatzman, L. & Strauss, A.L. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Sciarra, D. & Dorsey, A. (2002). Leaders and supervisors in child care programs . Albany, NY: Delmar.
34.
Short, E.C. (1995). A review of studies in the first 10 volumes of the journal of curriculum and supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11(1), 87-105.
35.
Smith, W. & Andrews, R. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
36.
Spaulding, A. (1997). Life in schools-a qualitative study of teacher perspectives on the politics of principals: Ineffective leadership behaviors and their consequences upon teacher thinking and behavior. School Leadership &Management, 17, 40-57.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
Symon, G. & Cassell, C. (1998). Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
Yogan, L.J. (2000). School tracking and student violence. Annals of the American Academy of Political &Social Science, 567, 108-123.
