Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to investigate interdisciplinary practices of 116 early intervention faculty. Results indicated that faculty engaged in a small amount of interdisciplinary teaching in their preservice programs. No significant differences were found in the amount of interdisciplinary teaching that faculty from four different discipline groups provided. Quantitative results indicated work environment variables were the strongest predictors of level of interdisciplinary collaboration. A content analysis revealed the most frequently reported hindrance to interdisciplinary collaboration was the work environment and the most frequently reported facilitator was the extent to which faculty value interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings suggest that policy supporting interdisciplinary service delivery has outstripped the field's capacity to prepare personnel using interdisciplinary practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Administration on Developmental Disabilities ( 1999, October 20). University affiliated programs for people with developmental disabilities. Retrieved October 11, 2002 , from www.acf.dhhs.gov/progams/add/states/UCEDDs.htm
2.
Allen-Meares, P., & Pugach, M. (1982). Facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration on behalf of handicapped children and youth. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 30-36.
3.
Bailey, D.B. (1989). Issues and directions in preparing professionals to work with young handicapped children and their families. In J. J. Gallagher, P L. Trohanis , & R. M. Clifford (Eds.), Policy implementation and P.L. 99-457 (pp. 97-132). Baltimore : Brookes.
4.
Bailey, D.B. (1996). An overview of interdisciplinary training. In A. Winderstrom & D. Bricker (Eds.), Preparing personnel to work with infants and young children and their families: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3-21). Baltimore: Brookes.
5.
Bailey, D.B., Buysse, V., & Palsha, S.A. (1990). Self-ratings of professional knowledge and skills in early intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 423-435.
6.
Bailey, D.B., Simeonsson, R.J., Yoder, D.E., & Huntington, G.S. (1990). Preparing professionals to serve infants and toddlers with handicaps and their families: An integrative analysis across eight disciplines. Exceptional Children, 57, 26-35.
7.
Casto, R.M. (1990). Models for interprofessional collaboration. In D. Hedmann (Ed.), Report of the proceedings of the First Yukon Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice (pp. 37-46). Whitehorse, Yukon Territory: Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice .
8.
Casto, R.M., Grant, K., & Burgess-Ellison, J.A. (1987). Attitude changes among students engaged in interprofessional education: Further results and discussion . In M. Brunner & R. M. Casto (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Health Team Care: Proceedings of the eighth annual conference (pp. 305-317). Columbus, OH: School of Allied Medical Professions and the Commission on Interprofessional Education and Practice, Ohio State University.
9.
Cobia, D.C., Center, H., Buckhald, J.A., & Meadows, M.E. (1995). An interprofessional model for serving youth at risk for substance abuse: The team case study. Journal of Drug Education, 25, 99-109.
10.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erblaum.
11.
Courtnage, L., & Smith-Davis, J. (1987). Interdisciplinary team training: A national survey of special education teacher training programs . Exceptional Children, 53, 451-458.
12.
Dunn, V.B., & Janata, M.M. (1987). Interprofessional assumptions and the OSU commission . Theory into Practice, 26, 99-102.
13.
Early, D.M., & Winton, P.J. (2001). Preparing the workforce: Early childhood teacher preparation at 2- and 4-year institutions of higher education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 285-306.
14.
Feather, N.T. (1982). Human values and the prediction of action: An expectancy-valence analysis. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 263-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Findholt, N.E., & Emmett, C.G. (1990). Impact of interdisciplinary team review on psychotropic drug use with persons who have mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 28, 41-46.
16.
Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change . Educational Researcher, 14, 5-12.
17.
Harbin, G.L., & McNulty, B.A. (1990). Policy implementation: Perspectives on service coordination and interagency cooperation. In S. J. Meisels & J. P Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 700-721). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hebbeler, K. (1997). Improving the quality of early intervention by enhancing faculty expertise: Findings and summaries of four regional institutes . Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
19.
Hochstadt, N.J., & Harwicke, N.J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow up study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 365-372.
20.
Johnson, L.J., & LaMontagne, M.J. (1993). Research methods: Using content analysis to examine the verbal or written communication of stakeholders within early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 73-79.
21.
Kilgo, J.L., & Bruder, M.B. (1997). Interdisciplinary approaches to personnel preparation in early intervention. In P. J. Winton , J. A. McCollum, & C. Catlett (Eds.), Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention: Issues, models and strategies (pp. 81-102). Baltimore : Brookes.
22.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
23.
Laatsch, L.J., Milson, L.M., & Zimmer, S.E. (1986). Use of interdisciplinary education to foster familiarization among health professionals. Journal of Allied Health, 15, 33-42.
24.
Mauro, L., Tiffany, E., & Woods, J.H. (1991). Structural components of interdisciplinary teaching: Barriers and enhancers. In L. M. Mauro & J. H. Woods (Eds.), Building bridges: Interdisciplinary research in child abuse and neglect (pp. 189-195). Philadelphia: Temple University, Child Welfare Training and Research Institute.
25.
McCollum, J.A., & Stayton, V.D. (1996). Preparing early childhood special educators. In D. Bricker & A. Widerstrom (Eds.), Preparing personnel to work with infants and young children and their families: A team approach (pp. 67-90). Baltimore : Brookes.
26.
Miller, P.S., Fader, L., & Vincent, L.J. (2000). Preparing early childhood educators to work with children who have exceptional needs. In D. Horm-Wingerd & M. Hyson (Eds.), New teachers for a new century: The future of early childhood professional preparation (pp. 89-122). Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education.
27.
Miller, P.S., & Stayton, V.D. (1998). Blended interdisciplinary teacher preparation in early education and intervention: A national study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 49-58.
28.
Miller, P.S., & Stayton, V.D. (1999). Higher education culture—A fit or misfit with reform in teacher education?Journal of Teacher Education , 50(4), 290-302.
29.
Pfeiffer, S.I., & Naglieri, J.A. (1983). An investigation of multidisciplinary team decision making. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 588-590.
30.
Prasse, D.P., & Fafard, M. (1982). Interdisciplinary training and professional interaction . Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 26-29.
31.
Rooney, R.T. (1994). Implementation of interdisciplinary personnel preparation for early intervention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill .
32.
Rosenkoetter, S., & Stayton, V.D. (1997). Designing and implementing innovative interdisciplinary practica. In P. J. Winton, J. A. McCollum, & C. Catlett (Eds.), Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention: Issues, models, and practical strategies (pp. 453-474). Baltimore: Brookes.
33.
Roush, J., Harrison, M., Palsha, S., & Davidson, D. (1992). A national survey of education preparation programs for early interventions specialists. American Annals of the Deaf, 137, 425-430.
34.
Rowan, L.E., McCollum, J.A., & Thorp, E.K. (1993). Collaborative graduate education of future early interventionists. Topics in Language Disorders, 14, 72-80.
35.
Schoen, L.G., & Winocur, S. (1988). An investigation of the self-efficacy of male and female academics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 307-320.
36.
Sherer, M., & Adams, C.H. (1983). Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale . Psychological Reports, 53, 899-902.
37.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J.E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R.W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation . Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
38.
Shonkoff, J., & Meisels, S. (1990). Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. In J. Shonkoff & S. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (pp. 3-31). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Stefanich, G.P., Wills, F.A., & Buss, R.R. (1991). The use of interdisciplinary teaming and its influence on student self-concept in middle schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 404-419.
40.
Stein, M.K., & Wang, M.C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education , 4, 171-187.
41.
Tompkins, F.M., Landers, M.F., & Weaver, R. (1989). How institutional factors are perceived to influence interdisciplinary collaboration efforts among education preparation programs . Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 75-78.
42.
Winton, P. (1996). Model for supporting higher education faculty in their early intervention personnel preparation roles. Infants and Young Children, 8, 56-67.
43.
Winton, P.J., Catlett, C., & Houck, A.E. (1996). A systems approach to personnel preparation. In A. Winderstrom & D. Bricker (Eds.), Preparing personnel to work with infants and young children and their families: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 295-320). Baltimore: Brookes.
