The purpose of this study was to examine the strength of scientific evidence from single-subject research underlying the Division of Early Childhood (DEC) Recommended Practices. From the 1990 to 1998 research literature, 184 articles met the inclusionary criteria for this review. In general, the literature provided positive, and in some cases very strong, scientific evidence for the effectiveness of practices from the Child-Focused Strand of the DEC Recommended Practices. Researchers most frequently used multiple-baseline, multiple-probe, alternating treatment, and a combination of designs. Treatment effects were replicated an average of 5.5 times per study, and treatments appeared to be implemented with a high degree of fidelity. Researchers less often provided evidence for maintenance, generalization, and social validity of treatments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
2.
Carnine, D. (1995). The professional context for collaboration and collaborative research. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 368-372.
3.
Carr, J.E., Austin, J.L., Britton, L.N., Kellum, K.K., & Bailey, J.S. (1999). An assessment of social validity trends in applied behavior analysis. Journal of Positive Behavioral Intervention , 14, 223-231.
4.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 52, 417-425.
5.
Gresham, E.M., Gansel, K.A., & Kurtz, P.F. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257-263.
6.
Guralnick, M.J. ( 1999). Second-generation research in the field of early intervention. In M. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention (pp. 3-22). Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
7.
Haring, N.E., & Lovitt, T.C. (1967). Operant methodology and educational technology in special education. In N. Haring & R. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Methods in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
8.
Kazdin, A.E. (1975). The impact of applied behavior analysis on diverse areas of research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 213-229.
9.
Kazdin, A.E. (1977). Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: The ABC's of reliability. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 10, 141-150.
10.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
LeLaurin, K., & Wolery, M. ( 1992). Research standards in early intervention: Defining, describing, and measuring the independent variable. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 275-288.
12.
Lonigan, C.J., Elbert, J.C., & Johnson, S.B. (1998). Empirically supported psychosocial interventions for children: An overview. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology , 27, 138-145.
13.
Patrick, P.D., Mozzini, M., & Patrick, S.T. (2000). Evidence-based care and the single-subject design . Infants and Young Children, 13( 1 ), 60-73.
14.
Peterson, L., Homer, A.L., & Wonderlich, S.A. ( 1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477-492.
15.
Schwartz, I.S., & Baer, D.M. (1991). Social validity assessment: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189-204.
16.
Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Smith, B.J., McLean, M.E., Sandall, S., Snyder, P., & Broudy, A. (2000). Methods and activities used to produce the DEC Recommended Practices. In S. Sandall, M. McLean, & B. Smith (Eds.), DEC recommended practices in early interventionlearly childhood special education (pp. 107-114). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
18.
Smith, B.J., Strain, P., Snyder, P., Sandall, S., McLean, M.E., Ramsey, A.B., & Sumi, W.C. (2002). An analysis of the literature review that contributed to the DEC Recommended Practices: Nine years of EI/ECSE research. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 108-119.
19.
Stokes, T.F., & Baer, D.M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
20.
Strain, P.S., McConnell, S.R., Carta, J.J., Fowler, S.A., Neisworth, J.T., & Wolery, M. (1992). Behaviorism in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 121-142.
21.
Strain, P.S., & Smith, B.J. (1986). A counter-interpretation of early intervention effects: A response to Casto and Mastropieri. Exceptional Children, 53, 260-265.
22.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. ( 1984). Single-subject research in special education . Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing .
23.
Wolery, M., & Dunlap, G. (2001). Reporting on studies using single-subject experimental methods. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 85-89.
24.
Wolery, M., & Garfinkle, A.N. (in press). Measures in intervention research with young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
25.
Wolf, M.M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
