Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, inflammatory, progressive neurological disease. Individuals with MS frequently experience muscle weakness, limited walking endurance, and impaired balance, which collectively reduce functional independence and quality of life. Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) has emerged as a potential adjunct neuromodulation technique to enhance neuroplasticity and improve motor outcomes. However, the effectiveness of RS-tDCS on motor performance in MS remains insufficiently understood.
Objective
To systematically evaluate the effects, feasibility, and reporting quality of RS-tDCS interventions targeting motor outcomes in individuals with MS.
Methods
A systematic review of the scientific literature from 2015 to 2025 was carried out, using engines of PubMed, EBSCO, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We identified studies that implemented RS-tDCS to improve motor function or reduce fatigue in MS population. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Intervention reporting quality was evaluated using the TIDieR checklist. A synthesis of the results was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines.
Results
Five studies met the inclusion criteria four randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized study, totaling 370 participants. Reports revealed improvements in gait performance, balance, and manual dexterity, whereas findings related to functional mobility and fatigue were mixed.
Conclusion
RS-tDCS appears feasible and may benefit select motor domains in MS; however, current evidence remains preliminary. This review highlights key methodological gaps and provides direction for future trials to establish the clinical relevance and scalability of decentralized neuromodulation in MS rehabilitation
AlbishiA. M. (2024). How does combining physical therapy with transcranial direct stimulation improve upper-limb motor functions in patients with stroke? A theory perspective. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 86(8), 4601–4607. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002287
2.
BalshemH.HelfandM.SchünemannH. J.OxmanA. D.KunzR.BrozekJ.VistG. E.Falck-YtterY.MeerpohlJ.NorrisS.GuyattG. H. (2011). GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
3.
BiksonM.GrossmanP.ThomasC.ZannouA. L.JiangJ.AdnanT.MourdoukoutasA. P.KronbergG.TruongD.BoggioP.BrunoniA. R.CharvetL.FregniF.FritschB.GillickB.HamiltonR. H.HampsteadB. M.JankordR.WoodsA. J. (2016). Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence-based update 2016. Brain Stimulation, 9(5), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004
4.
BuchE. R.SantarnecchiE.AntalA.BornJ.CelnikP. A.ClassenJ.GerloffC.HallettM.HummelF. C.NitscheM. A.Pascual-LeoneA.PaulusW. J.ReisJ.RobertsonE. M.RothwellJ. C.SandriniM.SchambraH. M.WassermannE. M.ZiemannU.CohenL. G. (2017). Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004
5.
CampbellM.McKenzieJ. E.SowdenA.KatikireddiS. V.BrennanS. E.EllisS.Hartmann-BoyceJ.RyanR.ShepperdS.ThomasJ.WelchV.ThomsonH. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
6.
CharvetL. E.DobbsB.ShawM. T.BiksonM.DattaA.KruppL. B. (2018). Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 24(13), 1760–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517732842
7.
CharvetL. E.GoldbergJ. D.LiX.BestP.LustbergM.ShawM.ZhovtisL.GutmanJ.DattaA.BiksonM.PilloniG.KruppL. B. (2025). Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training to reduce fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 4551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88255-2
8.
CharvetL. E.KasschauM.DattaA.KnotkovaH.StevensM. C.AlonzoA.LooC.KrullK. R.BiksonM. (2015). Remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for clinical trials: Guidelines for technology and protocols. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00026
9.
CuypersK.LeenusD. J.Van WijmeerschB.ThijsH.LevinO.SwinnenS. P.MeesenR. L. (2013). Anodal tDCS increases corticospinal output and projection strength in multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience Letters, 554, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.09.004
FedericoS.CaccianteL.CieślikB.TurollaA.AgostiniM.KiperP.PicelliA. (2024). Telerehabilitation for neurological motor impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis on quality of life, satisfaction, and acceptance in stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010299
FujitaN.KunimuneS.OkadaS. (2020). Contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation, ankle muscle activities, and coactivation during dual-tasks to postural steadiness: A pilot study. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 32(7), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.467
14.
GazeraniP. (2025). The neuroplastic brain: Current breakthroughs and emerging frontiers. Brain Research, 1858, 149643.
15.
Göksel KaratepeA.KayaT.GünaydnR.DemirhanA.CeP.GedizlioğluM. (2011). Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: The impact of depression, fatigue, and disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 34(4), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32834ad479
16.
HiewS.NguemeniC.ZellerD. (2022). Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in people with multiple sclerosis: A review. European Journal of Neurology, 29(2), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15163
17.
KesikburunS. (2022). Non-invasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.10608
NitscheM. A.CohenL. G.WassermannE. M.PrioriA.LangN.AntalA.PaulusW.HummelF.BoggioP. S.FregniF.Pascual-LeoneA. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
20.
NitscheM. A.PaulusW. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
21.
NitscheM. A.PaulusW. (2011). Transcranial direct current stimulation—update 2011. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29(6), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2011-0618
22.
Nombela-CabreraR.Pérez-NombelaS.Avendaño-CoyJ.Comino-SuárezN.Arroyo-FernándezR.Gómez-SorianoJ.Serrano-MuñozD. (2023). Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w
23.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
24.
PagliariC.TellaS. D.BonannoC.CaccianteL.CioetaM.De IccoR.JonsdottirJ.FedericoS.FranceschiniM.GoffredoM.RainoldiF.RovarisM.SpringhettiI.CalabròR. S.TassorelliC.RossiniP. M.BaglioF., & for RIN_TeleSM_Group. (2025). Enhancing the effect of rehabilitation on multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial investigating the impact of remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality telerehabilitation training. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 94, 106256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2024.106256
25.
PilloniG.LustbergM.MalikM.FeinbergC.DattaA.BiksonM.GutmanJ.KruppL.CharvetL. (2024). Hand functioning in progressive multiple sclerosis improves with tDCS added to daily exercises: A home-based randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 30(11-12), 1490–1502. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241275013
ReichD. S.LucchinettiC. F.CalabresiP. A. (2018). Multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1401483
28.
ShawM. T.BestP.FrontarioA.CharvetL. E. (2021). Telerehabilitation benefits patients with multiple sclerosis in an urban setting. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19861830
29.
SignalN.OlsenS.GomesE.McGeorgeC.TaylorD.AlderG. (2024). Developing the TIDieR-Rehab checklist: A modified Delphi process to extend the template for intervention description and replication for rehabilitation intervention reporting. BMJ Open, 14(11), e084319. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084319
30.
SterneJ. A. C.HernánM. A.ReevesB. C.SavovićJ.BerkmanN. D.ViswanathanM.HigginsJ. P. T. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 355, i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
31.
SterneJ. A. C.SavovićJ.PageM. J.ElbersR. G.BlencoweN. S.BoutronI.HigginsJ. P. T. (2019). Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
ValetM.LejeuneT.DevisM.van PeschV.El SankariS.StoquartG. (2019). Timed Up-and-Go and 2-Minute Walk Test in patients with multiple sclerosis with mild disability: Reliability, responsiveness, and link with perceived fatigue. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(4), 450–455. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05366-2
34.
VaseghiB.ZoghiM.JaberzadehS. (2015). The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: Conventional vs. Unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00533
35.
WaltonC.KingR.RechtmanL.KayeW.LerayE.MarrieR. A.BanekeP. (2020). Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26(14), 1816–1821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520970841
36.
YasarogluS.LiepertJ. (2022). Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke: Motor excitability and motor function. Clinical Neurophysiology, 144, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.09.003
ZhangL.SunY.DiaoZ.JiangY.HuY.MaY. (2025). Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on balance control in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, 1696343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1696343
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
