Individuals with stroke frequently experience limitations in activities of daily living, and compensation-based approaches have the potential to enhance functional adaptation. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a novel intervention, Compensation-Based Problem-Solving Therapy (CBPST), on participation and activities of daily living in individuals with stroke.
Methods
CBPST was developed by trained occupational therapists, emphasizing in Occupational Adaptation Model and compensatory strategies. The CBPST was delivered individually in five sessions weekly (during four week and approximately 40 min)and including identifying the problem, developing strategies, selecting strategy and implementing and evaluating the selected strategy. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention or control group. This study involved 50 individuals with stroke assigned to either an intervention (n = 24 and mean age 54.58 ± 7.86) or control group (n = 26 and mean age 54.56 ± 7.09). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post-intervention using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (Lawton-Brody IADL), Frenchay Activity Indeks (FAI) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank, Mann-Whitney U tests and effect sizes.
Results
Both groups showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in participation and activities of daily living. Effect size estimates in the intervention group indicated moderate to large clinical effects across outcome measures (COPM performance and satisfaction: 0.62; FIM: 0.62; Lawton–Brody IADL: 0.53; FAI: 0.55), supporting the preliminary efficacy of CBPST.
Conclusion
CBPST appears to be a feasible and promising approach to enhance adaptive participation after stroke by integrating problem-solving and compensatory strategies. Larger studies are warranted to confirm its clinical effectiveness.
AllredR. P.KimS. Y.JonesT. A. (2014). Use it and/or lose it — experience effects on brain remodeling across time after stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00379
2.
AwadM. K.HusseinE. E.MohamedM. A. (2023). Effect of compensatory strategies on severity and functional outcome of oropharyngeal dysphagia for stroke patients. Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal, 11(36), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.21608/asnj.2023.202129.1550
3.
BaileyR. R.KlaesnerJ. W.LangC. E. (2015). Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(10), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315583720
4.
BrosseauL.PhilippeP.BoulangerY. L. (1995). The functional independence measure: Validity of selected assessment methods applied to stroke survivors. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 11(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00013614-199509000-00012
5.
CaiS.WeiX.SuE.WuW.ZhengH.XieL. (2020). Online compensation detecting for real-time reduction of compensatory motions during reaching: A pilot study with stroke survivors. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00687-1
6.
CupE. H.Scholte op ReimerW. J. M.ThijssenM. C.van Kuyk-MinisM. A. H. (2003). Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupat189ional performance measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(4), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr635oa
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York University.
8.
FeiginV. L., et al. (2014). Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 383(9913), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4
9.
GrajoL.BoisselleA.DaLombaE. (2018). Occupational adaptation as a construct: A scoping review of literature. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1400
10.
IsikE. I.YilmazS.UysalI.BasarS. (2020). Adaptation of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale to Turkish: Validity and reliability study. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0051
11.
JoY. J.KimH. (2022). Effects of the model of human occupation-based home modifications on the time use, occupational participation and activity limitation in people with disabilities: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768306
12.
JonesT. A. (2017). Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(5), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.26
13.
JonesT. A.AllredR. P.JeffersonS. C.KerrA. L.WoodieD. A.ChengS. Y.AdkinsD. L. (2013). Motor system plasticity in stroke models: Intrinsically use-dependent, unreliably useful. Stroke, 44(6_suppl_1), S104–S106. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000037
14.
Kaya OzturkL.AkyurekG.SezerK. S.GurlekS. (2025). Examining the effect of “Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Group Therapy” on social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia: Randomized controlled study. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 41(4), 463–478.https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2024.2424978
15.
KeithR. A. (1987). The functional independence measure; a new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18. Retrieved fromhttps://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573668925979994496
LawM.BaptisteS.McCollM.OpzoomerA.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (1990). The Canadian occupational performance measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749005700207
18.
LawtonM.BrodyE. (1988). Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale. Self–rated version. In Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24(4), 789–791.
19.
LeH. T.HonmaK.AnnakaH.SunS.NomuraT. (2024). Effectiveness of problem-solving therapy in improving patient mental health, function, quality of life, and mortality post-stroke: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060446
20.
LeeK. E.ChoiM.JeoungB. (2022). Effectiveness of rehabilitation exercise in improving physical function of stroke patients: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912739
21.
LevinM. F.KleimJ. A.WolfS. L. (2009). What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke?Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308328727
22.
LimY. M.KimH.ChaY. J. (2020). Effects of environmental modification on activities of daily living, social participation and quality of life in the older adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1533595
23.
MassieC.MalcolmM. P.GreeneD.ThautM. (2009). The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: An exploratory study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(4), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.564
24.
MotaharinezhadF., et al. (2023). Development and pilot testing of an occupational therapy intervention program based on Occupational Adaptation Model for caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(6), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802262311544
25.
PlatzT. (2021). Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation: Evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. Springer. ISBN : 978-3-030-58504-4.
26.
RobinsonR. G.JorgeR. E.LongJ. (2017). Prevention of poststroke mortality using problem-solving therapy or escitalopram. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(5), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2016.10.001
27.
Roby-BramiA.JarrasseN.ParryR. (2021). Impairment and compensation in dexterous upper-limb function after stroke. From the direct consequences of pyramidal tract lesions to behavioral involvement of both upper-limbs in daily activities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 662006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.662006
28.
RochmahT. N.RahmawatiI. T.DahluiM.BudiartoW.BilqisN. (2021). Economic burden of stroke disease: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147552
29.
SchulingJ.De HaanR.LimburgM. T.GroenierK. H. (1993). The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke, 24(8), 1173–1177. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1173
ShangP.CaoX.YouS.FengX.LiN.JiaY. (2021). Problem-solving therapy for major depressive disorders in older adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(6), 1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01672-3
32.
StarkS., et al. (2018). Feasibility of a novel intervention to improve participation after stroke. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226177367
TaubE.UswatteG.MarkV. W. (2014). The functional significance of cortical reorganization and the parallel development of CI therapy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00396
35.
VisserM. M., et al. (2016). Problem-solving therapy during outpatient stroke rehabilitation improves coping and health-related quality of life: Randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 47(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.01096
36.
WadeD. T.Legh-SmithJ.HewerR. L. (1985). Social activities after stroke: Measurement and natural history using the frenchay activities Index. Disability and Rehabilitation, 7(4), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.3109/03790798509165991
37.
WahlA.-S.SchwabM. E. (2014). Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: Enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00381
38.
WalterA. A.Van PuymbroeckM.BoschP.SchmidA. A. (2022). Complementary and integrative health interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation: A systematic PRISMA review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(11), 2223–2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1830440
39.
WolfT. J., et al. (2016). The development of the improving participation after stroke self-management program (IPASS): An exploratory randomized clinical study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 23(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1155278
40.
WuC.ChenC.TangS. F.LinK.HuangY. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(8), 964–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.012
