The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined effect of motor imagery and action observation in context of functional rehabilitation and analyse their impact on different functional parameters.
Data Sources
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by means of bibliographic searches in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PEDro databases until May 2025.
Review Methods
Randomized clinical studies with participants older than 18 years with functional problems or limitations and combining action observation and motor imagery therapies were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool, Covidence and R platform v4.4.2 were used to assess the quality of the included articles, selection of studies and data analysis, and meta-analysis. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42024552072).
Results
Nine articles were ultimately selected. The health conditions addressed included neurological and ageing-related disorders, as well as trauma. Compared with each therapy alone or with conventional therapies, the combination of motor imagery and action observation demonstrated benefits in lower and upper limb functionality, mobility, gait speed and fear of movement. Treatment protocols used varied in dosage (time and repetitions) and frequency (number of sessions per week).
Conclusions
Combination of motor imagery and action observation therapies is beneficial for improving functionality, suggesting its potential value as an effective tool in the treatment of acute and chronic symptoms associated with various pathologies. However, clear standards regarding the dosages of these combined therapies are lacking.
BalconiM.CrivelliD.CortesiL. (2017). Transitive versus intransitive complex gesture representation: A comparison between execution, observation and imagination by fNIRS. Applied Psycholophysiology and Biofeedback, 42(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9365-1
2.
BalduzziS.RückerG.SchwarzerG. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 22(4), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
3.
BekJ.GowenE.VogtS.CrawfordT. J.PoliakoffE. (2019). Combined action observation and motor imagery influences hand movement amplitude in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 61, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.11.001
4.
BoeschE.BellanV.MoseleyG. L.StantonT. R. (2016). The effect of bodily illusions on clinical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain, 157(3), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000423
5.
CalmelsC. (2019). Beyond jeannerod’s motor simulation theory: An approach for improving post-traumatic motor rehabilitation. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 49(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2019.01.033
6.
ChoiJ.-B.YangS.-W.MaS.-R. (2022). The effect of action observation combined with motor imagery training on upper extremity function and corticospinal excitability in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912048
Covidence systematic review software. (2024). [Veritas Health Innovation]. Covidence. https://www.covidence.org/
9.
Cuenca-MartinezF.Reina-VaronaA.Castillo-GarciaJ.La ToucheR.Angulo-Diaz-ParrenoS.Suso-MartiL. (2022). Pain relief by movement representation strategies: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis of motor imagery, action observation and mirror therapy. European Journal of Pain, 26(2), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1870
10.
Cuenca-MartínezF.Angulo-Díaz-ParreñoS.Feijóo-RubioX.Fernández-SolísM. M.León-HernándezJ. V.La TouchE. R.Suso-MartÍ. L. (2022). Motor effects of movement representation techniques and cross-education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 58(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06893-3
11.
Cuenca-MartínezF.Suso-MartíL.León-HernándezJ. V.ToucheR. L. (2020). The role of movement representation techniques in the motor learning process: A neurophysiological hypothesis and a narrative review. Brain Sciences, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010027
12.
Di RienzoF.BlacheY.KanthackT. F. D.MonteilK.ColletC.GuillotA. (2015). Short-term effects of integrated motor imagery practice on muscle activation and force performance. Neuroscience, 305, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.080
13.
DuongS.BravoD.ToddK. J.FinlaysonR. J.TranD. Q. (2018). Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: An updated systematic review and narrative synthesis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien D’anesthesie, 65(6), 658–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1091-5
14.
EavesD. L.BehmerL. P.VogtS. (2016a). EEG And behavioural correlates of different forms of motor imagery during action observation in rhythmical actions. Brain and Cognition, 106, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.013
15.
EavesD. L.RiachM.HolmesP. S.WrightD. J. (2016). Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514
16.
Herrador ColmeneroL.Perez MarmolJ. M.Martí-GarcíaC.Querol ZaldivarM. d. L. Á.Tapia HaroR. M.Castro SánchezA. M.Aguilar-FerrándizM. E. (2018). Effectiveness of mirror therapy, motor imagery, and virtual feedback on phantom limb pain following amputation: A systematic review. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 42(3), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364617740230
17.
HigginsJ.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM.WelchsV. (2023). Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
18.
HoyekN.Di RienzoF.ColletC.HoyekF.GuillotA. (2014). The therapeutic role of motor imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(13), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.833309
19.
JeannerodM. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00034026
20.
JeannerodM. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1 Pt 2), S103–S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
21.
JeannerodM. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford University Press.
22.
KyawB. M.SaxenaN.PosadzkiP.VseteckovaJ.NikolaouC. K.GeorgeP. P.DivakarU.MasielloI.KononowiczA. A.ZaryN.CarL. T. (2019). Virtual reality for health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), e12959. https://doi.org/10.2196/12959
23.
La ToucheR.Fernández PérezJ. J.Martínez GarcíaS.Cuenca-MartínezF.López-de-Uralde-VillanuevaI.Suso-MartíL. (2020). Hypoalgesic effects of aerobic and isometric motor imagery and action observation exercises on asymptomatic participants: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.), 21(10), 2186–2199. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa015
24.
MarshallB.WrightD. J. (2016). Layered stimulus response training versus combined action observation and imagery: Effects on golf putting performance and imagery ability characteristics. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport & Physical Activity, 11(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2016-0007
25.
MarusicU.GrosprêtreS.ParavlicA.KovačS.PišotR.TaubeW. (2018). Motor imagery during action observation of locomotor tasks improves rehabilitation outcome in older adults after total hip arthroplasty. Neural Plasticity, 18(10), 5651391. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5651391
26.
MateoS.Di RienzoF.BergeronV.GuillotA.ColletC.RodeG. (2015). Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00234
27.
McNeillE.TothA. J.HarrisonA. J.CampbellM. J. (2020). Cognitive to physical performance: A conceptual model for the role of motor simulation in performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1689573
28.
Moreno-VerdúM.HamolineG.Van CaenegemE. E.WaltzingB. M.ForestS.ValappilA. C.KhanA. H.ChyeS.EsselaarM.CampbellM. J.McAllisterC. J.KraeutnerS. N.PoliakoffE.FrankC.EavesD. L.WakefieldC.BoeS. G.HolmesP. S.BrutonA. M.HardwickR. M. (2024). Guidelines for reporting action simulation studies (GRASS): Proposals to improve reporting of research in motor imagery and action observation. Neuropsychologia, 192, 108733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108733
29.
Oliva-SierraM.Ríos-LeónM.Abuín-PorrasV.Martín-CasasP. (2022). Eficacia de la terapia de espejo y terapia de observación de acciones en la parálisis cerebral infantil: Revisión sistemática. Anales Del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 45(2), e1003. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1003
30.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS., … MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
31.
ParkE.BaekS.ParkS. (2016). Systematic review of the effects of mirror therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(11), 3227. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3227
32.
PengT.-H.ZhuJ.-D.ChenC.-C.TaiR.-Y.LeeC.-Y.HsiehY.-W. (2019). Action observation therapy for improving arm function, walking ability, and daily activity performance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(8), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519839108
33.
Salik SengulY.KayaN.YalcinkayaG.KirmiziM.KalemciO. (2021). The effects of the addition of motor imagery to home exercises on pain, disability and psychosocial parameters in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Explore (New York, N.Y.), 17(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.02.001
34.
SarassoE.AgostaF.PiramideN.GardoniA.CanuE.LeocadiM.CastelnovoV.BasaiaS.TettamantiA.VolontèM. A.FilippiM. (2021). Action observation and motor imagery improve dual task in Parkinson’s disease: A clinical/fMRI study. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 36(11), 2569–2582. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28717
35.
SarrajA. R.JammoulN.Abou ZeidP.KhatibA. (2019). Effectiveness of motor imagery combined to action observation in controlling stroke-related genu recurvatum: A randomized controlled trial. In: 2019 Fifth international conference on advances in biomedical engineering, 220–222. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8940192
36.
SilvaS.BorgesL. R.SantiagoL.LucenaL.LindquistA. R.RibeiroT. (2020). Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9(9), CD013019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013019.pub2
37.
SterneJ. A. C.SavovićJ.PageM. J.ElbersR. G.BlencoweN. S.BoutronI.CatesC. J.ChengH.-Y.CorbettM. S.EldridgeS. M.EmbersonJ. R.HernánM. A.HopewellS.HróbjartssonA.JunqueiraD. R.JüniP.KirkhamJ. J.LassersonT.LiT. (HigginsJ. P. T. (2019). Rob 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
38.
SunY.WeiW.LuoZ.GanH.HuX. (2016). Improving motor imagery practice with synchronous action observation in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 23(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472
39.
Suso-MartíL.La ToucheR.Angulo-Díaz-ParreñoS.Cuenca-MartínezF.Suso-MartíL.Angulo-Díaz-ParreñoS.Cuenca-MartínezF. (2020). Effectiveness of motor imagery and action observation training on musculoskeletal pain intensity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Pain. European Journal of Pain, 24(5), 886–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1540
40.
TanabeJ.MorishitaM. (2022). Effects of action observation therapy with limited visual attention on walking ability in stroke patients. Journal of Motor Behavior, 54(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2021.1874861
41.
TemporitiF.GalbiatiE.BianchiF.BianchiA. M.GalliM.GattiR. (2024). Early sleep after action observation plus motor imagery improves gait and balance abilities in older adults. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53664-2
42.
TemporitiF.RuspiA.De LeoD.UgoliniA.GrappioloG.AvanziniP.RizzolattiG.GattiR. (2022). Action observation and motor imagery administered the day before surgery enhance functional recovery in patients after total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 36(12), 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221116820
43.
TeneT.Vique LópezD. F.Valverde AguirreP. E.Orna PuenteL. M.Vacacela GomezC. (2024). Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: An umbrella review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 6, 1365345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1365345
44.
TofaniM.SantecchiaL.ConteA.BerardiA.GaleotoG.SogosC.PetrarcaM.PanuccioF.CastelliE. (2022). Effects of mirror neurons-based rehabilitation techniques in hand injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095526
45.
Valadez RoqueG. D.Cantillo NegreteJ.Carino EscobarR. I.Torres ChávezA. (2024). Paresia de una extremidad superior. Recuperación mediante observación de la acción más imaginería motora en pacientes con ictus crónico. Revista de Neurología, 78(11), 307. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7811.2024017
46.
VogtS.RienzoF. D.ColletC.CollinsA.GuillotA. (2013). Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00807
47.
YapB. W. D.LimE. C. W. (2019). The effects of motor imagery on pain and range of motion in musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review using meta-analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 35(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000648
48.
ZhaoL. J.JiangL. H.ZhangH.LiY.SunP.LiuY.QiR. (2023). Effects of motor imagery training for lower limb dysfunction in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 102(5), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002107
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
