Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Effects of Robotic Mirroring Training and Mirror Therapy with Robot on Unilateral Neglect,Depression,and Activities of Daily Living Among Patients with Subacute Stroke
Interventions for unilateral neglect have involved various approaches, notably the integration of robotics into clinical practice.
Objective
This study examined the effects of Robotic Mirroring Training (RMTr) and Mirror Therapy with Robot (MTh-R) on unilateral neglect, activities of daily living (ADL), and depression, and compared the effectiveness of the two interventions.
Methods
This study was a randomized controlled trial. Twenty-four patients with subacute stroke were randomly assigned to either the RMTr group (n = 12) or the MTh-R group (n = 12). Both groups received 30-min sessions, three times per week for five weeks, using the same robotic glove (SY-HRE12, SYREBO): the mirroring function for the RMTr group and pre-programmed passive movements for the MTh-R group. Unilateral neglect was assessed using the Behavioral Inattention Test–Conventional (BIT-C) and the Korean Catherine Bergego Scale (K-CBS). ADLs were measured with the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and depression was assessed using the Korean Short Form Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS-K). Pre- and post-intervention scores and between-group differences were analyzed.
Results
Both groups showed significant improvements in BIT-C and K-CBS scores (p < 0.01). The RMTr group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in K-MBI (p < 0.01) and SGDS-K (p < 0.01), while the MTh-R group showed significant improvements in K-MBI (p < 0.05) and SGDS-K (p < 0.01). These results indicate reduced unilateral neglect, enhanced ADL performance, and decreased depression in both groups. Significant between-group differences were observed in BIT-C (p < 0.01), K-CBS, and SGDS-K (p < 0.05), confirming the greater overall effectiveness of the interventions.
Conclusions
While both interventions were effective, RMTr demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing unilateral neglect and depression.
AltschulerE. L.WisdomS. B.StoneL.FosterC.GalaskoD.LlewellynD. M. E.RamachandranV. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. The Lancet, 353(9169), 2035–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00920-4
BasterisA.NijenhuisS. M.StienenA. H.BuurkeJ. H.PrangeG. B.AmirabdollahianF. (2014). Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: A framework for classification based on a systematic review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 11, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-111
4.
BazanR.FonsecaB. H. D. S.MirandaJ. M. D. A.NunesH. R. D. C.BazanS. G. Z.LuvizuttoG. J. (2022). Effect of robot-assisted training on unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 36(8), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221110894
5.
BlankA. A.FrenchJ. A.PehlivanA. U.O’MalleyM. K. (2014). Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: Promoting patient engagement in therapy. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-014-0056-z
6.
BosmaM. S.CaljouwM. A.AchterbergW. P.NijboerT. C. (2023). Prevalence, severity and impact of visuospatial neglect in geriatric stroke rehabilitation, a cross-sectional study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 24(11), 1798–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2023.06.038
7.
BouskaM. J.KwatnyE. (1983). Manual for application of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test to the adult population. Moss Rehabilitation Hospital.
8.
BumbeaA. M.DumitraşcuR. C.BumbeaB. Ş.MuşetescuA. E.RogoveanuO.AlbuC.TrăistaruR. (2018). Post-stroke recovery updates. Palestrica of the Third Millennium Civilization & Sport, 19(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.26659/pm3.2018.19.1.53
9.
ButsingN.ZauszniewskiJ. A.RuksakulpiwatS.GriffinM. T. Q.NiyomyartA. (2024). Association between post-stroke depression and functional outcomes: A systematic review. Plos one, 19(8), e0309158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309158
10.
CardinaliL.BrozzoliC.FarneA. (2009). Peripersonal space and body schema: Two labels for the same concept?Brain Topography, 21(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0092-7
11.
ChaturvediP.TiwariV.SinghA. K.QaviA.ThackerA. K. (2020). Depression impedes neuroplasticity and quality of life after stroke. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(8), 4039–4044. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_273_20
12.
ChenY. W.LiK. Y.LinC. H.HungP. H.LaiH. T.WuC. Y. (2023). The effect of sequential combination of mirror therapy and robot-assisted therapy on motor function, daily function, and self-efficacy after stroke. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43981-3
13.
ChoM. J.BaeJ. N.SuhG. H.HahmB. J.KimJ. K.LeeD. W.KangM. H. (1999). Validation of geriatric depression scale, Korean version (GDS) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 38(1), 48–63.
14.
ChoiY. S.LeeK. W.LeeJ. H.KimS. B.ParkG. T.LeeS. J. (2016). The effect of an upper limb rehabilitation robot on hemispatial neglect in stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(4), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.4.611
15.
ChuC. Y.PattersonR. M. (2018). Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6
16.
CostantiniM.HaggardP. (2007). The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.001
17.
DeconinckF. J.SmorenburgA. R.BenhamA.LedebtA.FelthamM. G.SavelsberghG. J. (2015). Reflections on mirror therapy: A systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314546134
18.
De-Rosende-CeleiroI.Rey-VillamayorA.Francisco-de-MiguelI.Avila-AlvarezA. (2021). Independence in daily activities after stroke among occupational therapy patients and its relationship with unilateral neglect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147537
19.
DohleC.PüllenJ.NakatenA.KüstJ.RietzC.KarbeH. (2009). Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308324786
20.
DoronN.RandD. (2019). Is unilateral spatial neglect associated with motor recovery of the affected upper extremity poststroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319832606
21.
EmbrechtsE.Loureiro-ChavesR.NijboerT. C.LafosseC.TruijenS.SaeysW. (2024). The association of personal neglect with motor, activities of daily living, and participation outcomes after stroke: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 39(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad063
22.
EskesG. A.ButlerB.McDonaldA.HarrisonE. R.PhillipsS. J. (2003). Limb activation effects in hemispatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(3), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50012
23.
FisherG.Quel de OliveiraC.VerhagenA.GandeviaS.KennedyD. (2020). Proprioceptive impairment in unilateral neglect after stroke: A systematic review. SAGE Open Medicine, 8, 2050312120951073. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120951073
GarryM. I.LoftusA.SummersJ. J. (2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
26.
JeongE. H. (2017). A review of spatial neglect: Types, theories, neuroanatomy, assessments and treatment. Therapeutic Science For Rehabilitation, 6(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.22683/tsnr.2017.6.1.011
27.
JungH. Y.ParkB. K.ShinH. S.KangY. K.PyunS. B.PaikN. J.HanT. R. (2007). Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): Multi-center study for subjects with stroke. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(3), 283–297.
28.
KangY. W.NaD. R.HanS. H. (1997). A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. Journal of the Korean Neurological Association, 15(2), 300–308.
29.
KimD. H.LeeK. D.BuleaT. C.ParkH. S. (2022). Increasing motor cortex activation during grasping via novel robotic mirror hand therapy: A pilot fNIRS study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00988-7
30.
KimJ. H.KimS. Y. (2015). Effects of neurofeedback training on unilateral neglect and depression in patients with stroke. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(9), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.361
LeeB. E.ChoiH. S.HanS. J. (2015). Reliability and validity of Korean Catherine Bergego scale for evaluation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2015.23.2.04
33.
LeeM. M.ChoH. Y.SongC. H. (2012). The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 91(8), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa86d
34.
LiuC.LuJ.YangH.GuoK. (2022). Current state of robotics in hand rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094540
35.
LoA. C. (2012). Clinical designs of recent robot rehabilitation trials. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 91(11), S204–S216. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcfa3
36.
LongleyV.HazeltonC.HealC.PollockA.Woodward-NuttK.MitchellC.BowenA. (2021). Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7), 1–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub4
37.
Luukkainen-MarkkulaR.TarkkaI. M.PitkanenK.SiveniusJ.HamalainenH. (2009). Rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect: A randomized study using either arm activation or visual scanning training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2009-0520
38.
MolteniF.GasperiniG.CannavielloG.GuanziroliE. (2018). Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: Narrative review. PM&R, 10(9), S174–S188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005
MukamelR. (2012). Training induced mirroring properties in motor and sensory cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 3(85), 318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.06.079
41.
NamH. S.KohS.BeomJ.KimY. J.ParkJ. W.KohE. S.KimS. (2017). Recovery of proprioception in the upper extremity by robotic mirror therapy: A clinical pilot study for proof of concept. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(10), 1568. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1568
42.
NijboerT.Van de PortI.SchepersV.PostM.Visser-MeilyA. (2013). Predicting functional outcome after stroke: The influence of neglect on basic activities in daily living. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00182
43.
NijboerT. C.KollenB. J.KwakkelG. (2014). The impact of recovery of visuo-spatial neglect on motor recovery of the upper paretic limb after stroke. PLoS One, 9(6), e100584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100584
PandianJ. D.AroraR.KaurP.SharmaD.VishwambaranD. K.ArimaH. (2014). Mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke (MUST trial): A randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 83(11), 1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000773
46.
ParkJ. H. (2021). The effects of robot-assisted left-hand training on hemispatial neglect in older patients with chronic stroke: A pilot and randomized controlled trial. Medicine, 100(9), e24781. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024781
47.
PrestonC.NewportR. (2011). Evidence for dissociable representations for body image and body schema from a patient with visual neglect. Neurocase, 17(6), 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2010.532504
48.
PuntT. D.RiddochM. J. (2006). Motor neglect: Implications for movement and rehabilitation following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(13-14), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500535025
49.
PushkoO. O. (2021). The influence of active rehabilitation on the recovery of cognitive and psychoemotional disorders after ischemic stroke. Wiadomosci Lekarskie, 74(8), 1910–1916. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202108123
50.
RamachandranV. S.Rogers-RamachandranD. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263(1369), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0058
51.
ReinhartS.SchmidtL.KuhnC.RosenthalA.SchenkT.KellerI.KerkhoffG. (2012). Limb activation ameliorates body-related deficits in spatial neglect. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00188
52.
RobertsonI. H.NorthN. (1992). Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: The role of hemispace, hand and motor activation. Neuropsychologia, 30(6), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(92)90058-T
53.
SalatinoA.ZavattaroC.GammeriR.CirilloE.PiattiM. L.PyasikM.RicciR. (2023). Virtual reality rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of immersive, semi-immersive and non-immersive techniques. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 152, 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105248
54.
SchraderM.SterrA.KettlitzR.WohlmeinerA.BuschfortR.DohleC.BamborschkeS. (2022). The effect of mirror therapy can be improved by simultaneous robotic assistance. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 40(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-221263
55.
SellesR. W.MichielsenM. E.BussmannJ. B.StamH. J.HurkmansH. L.HeijnenI.RibbersG. M. (2014). Effects of a mirror-induced visual illusion on a reaching task in stroke patients: Implications for mirror therapy training. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(7), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314521005
56.
SharmaG. S.GuptaA.KhannaM.PrakashN. B. (2021). Post-stroke depression and its effect on functional outcomes during inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 12(3), 543. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731958
57.
SharmaV. S.SharathH. V.SasunA. R. (2024). Effectiveness of Syrebo’s Glove Rehabilitation Program in a Patient With Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct: A Case Report. Cureus, 16(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59314
58.
SimT. Y.KwonJ. S. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of bimanual and unimanual mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke: A pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation, 50(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-210233
59.
SobrinhoK. R. F.SantiniA. C. M.MarquesC. L. S.GabrielM. G.NetoE. D. M.de SouzaL. A. P. S.LuvizuttoG. J. (2018). Impact of unilateral spatial neglect on chronic patient's post-stroke quality of life. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 35(3-4), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2018.1521791
60.
TaravatiS.CapaciK.UzumcugilH.TanigorG. (2022). Evaluation of an upper limb robotic rehabilitation program on motor functions, quality of life, cognition, and emotional status in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled study. Neurological Sciences, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05431-8
61.
TurgutN.MöllerL.DenglerK.SteinbergK.SprengerA.ElingP.HildebrandtH. (2018). Adaptive cueing treatment of neglect in stroke patients leads to improvements in activities of daily living: A randomized controlled, crossover trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 32(11), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318807054
62.
WeeJ. Y.HopmanW. M. (2008). Comparing consequences of right and left unilateral neglect in a stroke rehabilitation population. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 87(11), 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818a58bd
63.
WilsonB.CockburnJ.HalliganP. (1987). Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(2), 98–102.
64.
ZhangW.YangS.WangY.HeX.LuJ.,XieQ. (2015). Effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on the activities of daily living of patients with acute stroke. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology & Neurosurgery, 15(4), 280. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2015.04.006
