Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Mirror Therapy Improves the Motor and Timed Functional Ability of the Upper Extremity among Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Single-Blinded Multicentred Randomized Controlled Trial
Around 80% of stroke survivors experience upper-limb impairment during the acute phase, with 55% to 75% still affected after 6 months, hindering their daily activities. Consequently, upper-limb rehabilitation has become essential in post-stroke management, leading to innovative therapeutic methods. Despite the variety of available techniques, Mirror Therapy stands out as a feasible and cost-effective option alongside conventional physical therapy. This study aims to assess the impact of Mirror Therapy on improving motor and timed functional abilities of the upper extremities in chronic stroke patients in Saudi Arabia.
Methodology
This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at 3 Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia with 38 chronic stroke patients randomly assigned into two treatment arms, experimental group (n = 19) and control group (n = 19). The study was registered in clinicaltrails.gov with the registration ID NCT06698380. The experimental group received 45 min of training three days a week for six weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function S Test (WMFT) were used as outcome measures. Pre- and post-intervention measurements were obtained.
Results
The participants’ average age was 54.97 ± 7.11 years, with an average height of 165.66 ± 11.21 cm, weight of 78.92 ± 18.96 kg, and BMI of 28.71 ± 6.19 kg/m². Among them, the majority of participants were male (68.4%), with ischemic strokes being the most prevalent type (73.7%). The FMA-US and WMFT scores showed significant improvement in the experimental group (p < 0.001) when compared to the control group.
Conclusion
Mirror Therapy significantly enhances motor ability and timed functional activities in the upper extremity of chronic stroke patients.
AlatawiS. F. (2021). A scoping review of the nature of physiotherapists’ role to avoid fall in people with parkinsonism. Neurological Sciences, 42(9), 3733–3748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-05015-y
2.
Al-HazzaaH. M. (2018). Physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia revisited: A systematic review of inactivity prevalence and perceived barriers to active living. International Journal of Health Sciences, 12(6), 50–64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6257875/
3.
AlqahtaniB. A.AlenaziA. M.HooverJ. C.AlshehriM. M.AlghamdiM. S.OsailanA. M.KhuntiK. (2020). Incidence of stroke among Saudi population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurological Sciences, 41(11), 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04520-4
4.
Al-SenaniF.Al-JohaniM.SalawatiM.AlhazzaniA.MorgensternL. B.Seguel RavestV.CucheM.EggingtonS. (2020). An epidemiological model for first stroke in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal of National Stroke Association, 29(1), 104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104465
5.
AmasyaliS. Y.YalimanA. (2016). Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: A pilot study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift Fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale De Recherches De Readaptation, 39(4), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000186
6.
Arevalo-RodriguezI.SmailagicN.Roqué I FigulsM.CiapponiA.Sanchez-PerezE.GiannakouA.PedrazaO. L.Bonfill CospX.CullumS. (2015). Mini-Mental state examination (MMSE) for the detection of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(3), CD010783. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010783.pub2
7.
BasriR.IssraniR.Hua GanS.PrabhuN.Khursheed AlamM. (2021). Burden of stroke in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.002
CacchioA.BlasisE. D.NecozioneS.OrioF. d.SantilliV. (2009). Mirror therapy for chronic Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(6), 634–636. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc0902799
ChinnavanE.PriyaY.RagupathyR.WahY. C. (2020). Effectiveness of mirror therapy on upper limb motor functions among hemiplegic patients. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 19(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v19i2.44997
12.
ColomerC.NOéE.LlorensR. (2016). Mirror therapy in chronic stroke survivors with severely impaired upper limb function: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(3), 271–278.
13.
CookC. E. (2008). Clinimetrics corner: The minimal clinically important change score (MCID): A necessary pretense. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 16(4), E82–E83. https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2008.16.4.82E
14.
CorbettaD.SirtoriV.CastelliniG.MojaL.GattiR. (2015). Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(10), CD004433. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004433.pub3
15.
DeconinckF. J. A.SmorenburgA. R. P.BenhamA.LedebtA.FelthamM. G.SavelsberghG. J. P. (2015). Reflections on mirror therapy: A systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314546134
16.
de Groot-DriessenD.van de SandeP.van HeugtenC. (2006). Speed of finger tapping as a predictor of functional outcome after unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.022
DohleC.StephanK. M.ValvodaJ. T.HosseinyO.TellmannL.KuhlenT.SeitzR. J.FreundH.-J. (2011). Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus. Experimental Brain Research, 208(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2503-0
19.
El-HajjM.SalamehP.RachidiS.HosseiniH. (2016). The epidemiology of stroke in the Middle East. European Stroke Journal, 1(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987316654338
20.
EshtV.AlshehriM. M.BalasubramanianK.SanjeeviR. R.ShapheM. A.AlhowimelA.AlenaziA. M.AlqahtaniB. A.AlhwoaimelN. (2024). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for neurological disability among subacute stroke survivors to improve multiple domains in health-related quality of life: Randomized controlled trial protocol. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 54(3), 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102976
21.
Evidence reviews for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of mirror therapy: Stroke rehabilitation in adults (update): Evidence review Q. (2023). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK601637/
22.
GBD 2017 Saudi Arabia Collaborators. (2020). The burden of disease in Saudi Arabia 1990-2017: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. Planetary Health, 4(5), e195–e208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30075-9
KhanM.AlmutairiM. A.AldhafeeriH. M.SharahilyM. A.AmriM. I. (2023). Comparison of dual-task specific training & conventional physiotherapeutic interventions in ambulation of left hemiplegic stroke patients: A randomized control trial. Asian Journal of Research and Reports in Neurology, 6(1), 121–128.
25.
KimH.HerJ.KoJ.ParkD.WooJ.-H.YouY.ChoiY. (2012). Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for hemiplegic patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(9), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.893
26.
LinK.HsiehY.WuC.ChenC.JangY.LiuJ. (2009). Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the wolf motor function test in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331144
27.
LukeC.DoddK. J.BrockK. (2004). Outcomes of the bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(8), 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr793oa
28.
MathiesonS.ParsonsJ.KaplanM.ParsonsM. (2018). Combining functional electrical stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery following stroke: A randomised trial. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 20(4), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2018.1472635
29.
MorrisD. M.UswatteG.CragoJ. E.CookE. W.TaubE. (2001). The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(6), 750–755. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.23183
30.
ParkJ. (2015). Proposal for a modified dreyfus and miller model with simplified competency level descriptions for performing self-rated surveys. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 12, 54. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.54
31.
PatelJ. (n.d.). Advances in the study of mirror neurons and their impact on neuroscience: An editorial. Cureus, 16(5), e61299. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61299
32.
PathakA.GyanpuriV.DevP.DhimanN. R. (2021). The bobath concept (NDT) as rehabilitation in stroke patients: A systematic review. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10(11), 3983–3990. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_528_21
33.
Pérez-CruzadoD.Merchán-BaezaJ. A.González-SánchezM.Cuesta-VargasA. I. (2017). Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12342
34.
PuL.WangL.ZhangR.ZhaoT.JiangY.HanL. (2023). Projected global trends in ischemic stroke incidence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years from 2020 to 2030. Stroke, 54(5), 1330–1339. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073
RobertA. A.ZamzamiM. M. (2014). Stroke in Saudi Arabia: A review of the recent literature. The Pan African Medical Journal, 17(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.14.3015
37.
StrilciucS.GradD. A.RaduC.ChiraD.StanA.UngureanuM.GheorgheA.MuresanuF.-D. (2021). The economic burden of stroke: A systematic review of cost of illness studies. Journal of Medicine and Life, 14(5), 606–619. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0361
38.
ThiemeH.MorkischN.MehrholzJ.PohlM.BehrensJ.BorgettoB.DohleC. (2018). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(7), CD008449. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub3
39.
WolfS. L.CatlinP. A.EllisM.ArcherA. L.MorganB.PiacentinoA. (2001). Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32(7), 1635–1639. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
40.
WuC.-Y.HuangP.-C.ChenY.-T.LinK.-C.YangH.-W. (2013). Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(6), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.007
41.
WurzingerE.AbzhandadzeH.RafstenT.SunnerhagenL.SK. (2021). Dependency in activities of daily living during the first year after stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 736684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.736684
42.
ZengW.GuoY.WuG.LiuX.FangQ. (2018). Mirror therapy for motor function of the upper extremity in patients with stroke: A meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2287
43.
ZhangJ. J. Q.FongK. N. K.WelageN.LiuK. P. Y. (2018). The activation of the mirror neuron system during action observation and action execution with mirror visual feedback in stroke: A systematic review. Neural Plasticity, 2018(1), 2321045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2321045
44.
ZhangK.DingL.WangX.ZhuangJ.TongS.JiaJ.GuoX. (2024). Evidence of mirror therapy for recruitment of ipsilateral motor pathways in stroke recovery: A resting fMRI study. Neurotherapeutics, 21(2), e00320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00320
