Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive and painless technique used to modulate central nervous system activity. It has shown promise in improving motor, swallowing, speech, and cognitive functions in patients after stroke. However, limited research has focused on its effect on post-stroke balance, and stimulation parameters remain inconsistent.
Objective
To systematically evaluate the efficacy of rTMS on balance function in stroke patients by analyzing stimulation parameters, target sites, and clinical outcomes from recent RCTs, and to identify optimal evidence-based protocols for post-stroke balance rehabilitation.
Methods
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for RCTs. Eighteen RCTs were included. All included studies demonstrated high methodological quality (PEDro scores ≥ 6).
Results
The primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum were the most frequently targeted stimulation sites. Most studies employed low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) or iTBS. Across the included studies, rTMS demonstrated improvements in balance(BBS), lower-limb motor function(FMA-LE) and gait parameters compared with control groups (P < 0.05). Effect sizes varied depending on stimulation site and parameters. Clinical improvements were sustained across multiple assessment domains. Some studies reported a greater reduction in pdBSI in the rTMS group (mean difference: −0.12, 95% CI:-0.22 to −0.02, P = 0.026) and a smaller increase in MEP amplitude (mean difference: 8.5 μV, 95% CI:0.9 to 16.1 μV, P = 0.028).
Conclusion
Current evidence suggests that rTMS targeting M1 or cerebellum may effectively improve balance in stroke patients. Preliminary evidence supports either (1) LF-rTMS to the unaffected M1 or (2) cerebellar iTBS as potentially effective protocols. However, further high-quality trials are needed to establish standardized treatment parameters.
FeiginVL, et al.World stroke organization: global stroke fact sheet 2025. Int J Stroke2025; 20: 132–144.
2.
Collaborators GBDNSD. Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet Neurol2024; 23: 344–381.
3.
FeiginV.L.OwolabiM.O., and G. World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission Stroke Collaboration. Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a world stroke organization-lancet neurology commission. Lancet Neurol, 2023. 22: p 1160–1206,
4.
JorgensenHS, et al.Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 27–32.
5.
HandelzaltsS, et al.Effects of perturbation-based balance training in subacute persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2019; 33: 213–224.
6.
NybergLGustafsonY. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke1997; 28: 716–721.
7.
YangS, et al.Improving balance skills in patients who had stroke through virtual reality treadmill training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2011; 90: 969–978.
8.
YuHX, et al.Effect of cognitive function on balance and posture control after stroke. Neural Plast2021; 2021: 6636999.
9.
WeeJYWongHPalepuA. Validation of the berg balance scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 731–735.
10.
PollockA, et al.Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol2012; 11: 09.
11.
SurgentOJ, et al.Balance and the brain: a review of structural brain correlates of postural balance and balance training in humans. Gait Posture2019; 71: 245–252.
12.
DijkstraBW, et al.Functional neuroimaging of human postural control: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2020; 115: 351–362.
13.
CharalambousCCBowdenMGAdkinsDL. Motor Cortex and motor cortical interhemispheric communication in walking after stroke: the roles of transcranial magnetic stimulation and animal models in our current and future understanding. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2016; 30: 94–102.
14.
NtakouEA, et al.Targeting cerebellum with non-invasive transcranial magnetic or current stimulation after cerebral hemispheric stroke-insights for corticocerebellar network reorganization: a comprehensive review. Healthcare (Basel)2022; 10: 2401.
15.
BarkerATJalinousRFreestonIL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet1985; 1: 1106–1107.
16.
YuH, et al.Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on gait and postural control ability of patients with executive dysfunction after stroke. Brain Sci2022; 12: 1185.
17.
KroghS, et al.Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving lower limb function in individuals with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials. J Rehabil Med2022; 54: jrm00256.
18.
DuJ, et al.Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments. Neuroimage Clin2019; 21: 101620.
19.
NardoneR, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: evidence from animal and human studies. Brain Res Bull2020; 159: 44–52.
20.
Di PinoG, et al.Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol2014; 10: 597–608.
21.
VeldemaJGharabaghiA. Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil2022; 19: 84.
22.
XiaY, et al.Cerebellum-Cerebrum paired target magnetic stimulation on balance function and brain network of patients with stroke: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy pilot study. Front Neurol2022; 13: 1071328.
23.
SuX, et al.The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation for post-stroke lower limb motor recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation2025; 56: 219–233.
24.
FangL, et al.Effects of combining rTMs and augmented reality gait adaptive training on walking function of patients with stroke based on three-dimensional gait analysis and sEMG: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract2025; 41: 935–945.
25.
ZhuPA, et al.Can cerebellar theta-burst stimulation improve balance function and gait in stroke patients? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2024; 60: 391–399.
26.
WangY, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with visual-feedback cycling exercise improves walking ability and walking stability after stroke: a randomized pilot study. Neural Plast2024; 2024: 8737366.
27.
WangL, et al.Clinical effect analysis of wearable sensor technology-based gait function analysis in post-transcranial magnetic stimulation stroke patients. Sensors (Basel)2024; 24: 3051.
28.
ZhangW, et al.Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intelligent gait-adaptability training in improving lower limb function and brain symmetry after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2024; 33: 107961.
29.
LiaoLY, et al.Intermittent theta-burst stimulation for stroke: primary motor Cortex versus cerebellar stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled trial. Stroke2024; 55: 156–165.
30.
ZhaoL, et al.Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at different targets on brain function in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol2024; 15: 1454220.
31.
ZhuS, et al.Combined effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation and argatroban on balance function and daily living activities in hemiplegic patients following cerebral infarction. Altern Ther Health Med2023; 29: 41–45.
32.
ChenR, et al.Treatment effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with motor relearning procedure on spasticity and limb motor function in stroke patients. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1213624.
33.
ImNG, et al.Effect of low frequency cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on balance impairment in patients with cerebral infarction. Ann Rehabil Med2022; 46: 275–283.
34.
LiaoLY, et al.Cerebellar theta-burst stimulation combined with physiotherapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2021; 35: 23–32.
35.
KochG, et al.Effect of cerebellar stimulation on gait and balance recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol2019; 76: 170–178.
36.
LinLF, et al.Simultaneous stimulation in bilateral leg motor areas with intermittent theta burst stimulation to improve functional performance after stroke: a feasibility pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2019; 55: 162–168.
37.
HuangYZ, et al.Priming with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over contralesional leg motor Cortex does not increase the rate of regaining ambulation within 3 months of stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2018; 97: 339–345.
38.
ForoghB, et al.The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on postural stability after acute stroke: a clinical trial. Basic Clin Neurosci2017; 8: 405–411.
39.
LinYN, et al.Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere leg motor area in patients with subacute stroke and substantial leg impairment: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med2015; 47: 305–310.
40.
KimWS, et al.Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on patients with ataxia after posterior circulation stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med2014; 46: 418–423.
41.
LukKYOuyangHXPangMYC. Low-Frequency rTMS over contralesional M1 increases ipsilesional cortical excitability and motor function with decreased interhemispheric asymmetry in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled study. Neural Plast2022; 2022: 3815357.
42.
EdwardsDJ, et al.Electric field navigated 1-Hz rTMS for poststroke motor recovery: the E-FIT randomized controlled trial. Stroke2023; 54: 2254–2264.
43.
BaiZZhangJFongKNK. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil2022; 19: 24.
44.
XieYJ, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Neural Regen Res2021; 16: 1168–1176.
45.
HummelFCCohenLG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?Lancet Neurol2006; 5: 708–712.
46.
LomarevMP, et al.Safety study of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol2007; 118: 2072–2075.
47.
BenningerDH, et al.Safety study of 50 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurophysiol2009; 120: 809–815.
48.
RossiS, et al.Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol2021; 132: 269–306.
49.
SpampinatoDCelnikP. Multiple motor learning processes in humans: defining their neurophysiological bases. Neuroscientist2021; 27: 246–267.
50.
MitomaH, et al.Consensus paper. Cerebellar reserve: from cerebellar physiology to cerebellar disorders. Cerebellum2020; 19: 131–153.
51.
HuangYZ, et al.Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron2005; 45: 201–206.
52.
BonniS, et al.Cerebellar theta burst stimulation in stroke patients with ataxia. Funct Neurol2014; 29: 41–45.
53.
CunningtonR, et al.The preparation and execution of self-initiated and externally-triggered movement: a study of event-related fMRI. Neuroimage2002; 15: 373–385.
54.
KimJH, et al.Defining functional SMA and pre-SMA subregions in human MFC using resting state fMRI: functional connectivity-based parcellation method. Neuroimage2010; 49: 2375–2386.
55.
ManjiA, et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area body weight-supported treadmill gait training in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Neurosci Lett2018; 662: 302–305.
56.
ChengHL, et al.Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with visual feedback training in improving neuroplasticity and lower limb function after chronic stroke: a pilot study. Biology (Basel)2023; 12: 515.
57.
MuraseN, et al.Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol2004; 55: 400–409.
58.
GrohnH, et al.Influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on human neurochemistry and functional connectivity: a pilot MRI/MRS study at 7 T. Front Neurosci2019; 13: 1260..
59.
CantoneM, et al.Editorial: non-invasive brain stimulation in the study and modulation of metaplasticity in neurological disorders. Front Neurol2021; 12: 721906.
60.
BadoiuA, et al.From molecule to patient rehabilitation: the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation and magnetic stimulation on stroke—a narrative review. Neural Plast2023; 2023: 5044065.
61.
LiH, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates neurological deficits after cerebral ischemia through interaction between RACK1 and BDNF exon IV by the phosphorylation-dependent factor MeCP2. Neurotherapeutics2020; 17: 651–663.
62.
CaglayanAB, et al.Acute and post-acute neuromodulation induces stroke recovery by promoting survival signaling, neurogenesis, and pyramidal tract plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci2019; 13: 44.
63.
KochG, et al.Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum. Clin Neurophysiol2008; 119: 2559–2569.
64.
ClarksonAN, et al.Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke. Nature2010; 468: 305–309.
65.
ItoM. Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles. Physiol Rev2001; 81: 1143–1195.
66.
KellyRMStrickPL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci2003; 23: 8432–8444.
67.
LefaucheurJP, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol2020; 131: 474–528.
68.
StinearCM. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers. Lancet Neurol2017; 16: 826–836.
69.
DengZDLisanbySHPeterchevAV. Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol2014; 125: 1202–1212.
