Employing telecommunication systems and digital platforms, athletes can continuously access tailored injury prevention protocols, receive real-time feedback on exercise performance.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the feasibility, adherence, and benefits of a digitally administered adaptation of the FIFA 11 + protocol in professional football players.
Methods
This multicenter randomized prospective controlled study involved football players aged 15–40 from Italy and Switzerland, recruited between May 2023 and February 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Intervention group (FIFA 11 + protocol administered digitally) or the Control group (traditional in-person FIFA 11 + protocol). Both groups performed the protocol twice a week for six months. Primary outcomes included the Illinois Agility Test, Slalom Dribbling Test, Multistage 20 m Shuttle Run Test (MSRT), and muscle strength tests for the hamstrings.
Results
Fifty-five players participated: 27 in the Intervention group (mean age 20.63) and 28 in the Control group (mean age 20.25). Both groups showed significant improvements in hamstring strength, sprint performance, and MSRT outcomes (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of strength, heart rate response, perceived exertion, or agility (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
FIFA 11 + protocol has been shown to be effective as the in-person version for improving physical performance and preventing injuries in football players. Further research is needed to explore this approach in broader settings.
VerhagenEAvan StralenMMvan MechelenW. Behaviour, the key factor for sports injury prevention. Sports Med2010; 40: 899–906.
2.
MendonçaLMSchuermansJDenolfS, et al.Sports injury prevention programmes from the sports physical therapist's perspective: an international expert delphi approach. Phys Ther Sport2022; 55: 146–154.
3.
StephensonSDKocanJWVinodAV, et al.A comprehensive summary of systematic reviews on sports injury prevention strategies. Orthop J Sports Med2021; 9: 23259671211035776.
4.
PlummerAMugeleHSteffenK, et al.General versus sports-specific injury prevention programs in athletes: a systematic review on the effects on performance. PloS one2019; 14: e0221346.
5.
HewettTEBatesNA. Preventive biomechanics: a paradigm shift with a translational approach to injury prevention. Am J Sports Med2017; 45: 2654–2664.
6.
HübscherMZechAPfeiferK, et al.Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention. Med Sci Sports Exercise2010; 42: 413–421.
7.
CaldemeyerLEBrownSMMulcaheyMK. Neuromuscular training for the prevention of ankle sprains in female athletes: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed2020; 48: 363–369.
8.
DemecoAde SireAMarottaN, et al.Match analysis, physical training, risk of injury and rehabilitation in padel: overview of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 4153.
9.
Jaenada-CarrileroEVicente-MampelJBaraja-VegasL, et al.Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite and sub-elite female soccer players according to players level and leg limb-dominance. BMC sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation2024; 16: 53.
10.
de SireADemecoAMarottaN, et al.Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention exercises: could a neuromuscular warm-up improve muscle Pre-activation before a soccer game? A proof-of-principle study on professional football players. Appl Sci2021; 11: 4958.
11.
McKeonPOHertelJ. Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part II: is balance training clinically effective?J Athl Train2008; 43: 305–315.
12.
de SireAMarottaNDemecoA, et al.Electromyographic assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in male tennis players: which role for visual input? A proof-of-concept study. Diagnostics2021; 11: 997.
13.
González-FernándezFTMartínez-ArandaLMFalces-PrietoM, et al.Exploring the Y-balance-test scores and inter-limb asymmetry in soccer players: differences between competitive level and field positions. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2022; 14: 45.
14.
BrunnerRFriesenbichlerBCasartelliNC, et al.Effectiveness of multicomponent lower extremity injury prevention programmes in team-sport athletes: an umbrella review. Br J Sports Med2019; 53: 282–288.
15.
PaduaED'AmicoAGAlashramA, et al.Effectiveness of warm-up routine on the ankle injuries prevention in young female basketball players: a randomized controlled trial. Medicina (Kaunas) Lithuania2019; 55: 55–55.
16.
KekelekisAManuel ClementeFKellisE. Muscle injury characteristics and incidence rates in men's amateur soccer: a one season prospective study. Res Sports Med2024; 32: 411–424.
17.
PuliciLCertaDZagoM, et al.Injury burden in professional european football (soccer): systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic considerations. Clinical J Sport Med2022: 450–457.
18.
NawasrehZHYabroudiMADebesWA, et al.Factors associating with the severity of soccer injury among men and women professional teams. J Sci Sport Exercise2023: 852–861.
19.
GizaEMicheliLJ. Soccer injuries. Med Sport Sci2005; 49: 140–169.
20.
HawkinsRDFullerCW. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med1999; 33: 196–203.
21.
López-ValencianoARuiz-PérezIGarcia-GómezA, et al.Epidemiology of injuries in professional football: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2020; 54: 711–718.
22.
SadigurskyDBraidJADe LiraDNL, et al.The FIFA 11 + injury prevention program for soccer players: a systematic review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2017; 9: 18.
23.
KhanMASuhaimiSAlhazmiR, et al.Effects of FIFA 11 + injury prevention program in reducing the non-specific knee injuries incidence rate among soccer players. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Orthopaedics Physiotherapy2023; 5: 01–08.
24.
AsgariMNazariBBizziniM, et al.Effects of the FIFA 11 + program on performance, biomechanical measures, and physiological responses: a systematic review. J Sport Health Sci2023; 12: 226–235.
25.
NuhuAJelsmaJDunleavyK, et al.Effect of the FIFA 11 + soccer specific warm up programme on the incidence of injuries: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PloS one2021; 16: e0251839.
26.
AsgariMAlizadehMHShahrbanianS, et al.Effects of the FIFA 11 + and a modified warm-up programme on injury prevention and performance improvement among youth male football players. PloS one2022; 17: e0275545.
27.
Al AttarWSAKhalediEHBakhshJM, et al.Injury prevention programs that include balance training exercises reduce ankle injury rates among soccer players: a systematic review. J Physiother2022; 68: 165–173.
28.
LippiLTurcoAFolliA, et al.Technological advances and digital solutions to improve quality of life in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res2023; 35: 953–968.
29.
BehanFPvan DykNRaneL, et al.Implementing hamstring injury prevention programmes remotely: a randomised proof of concept trial. BMJ open Sport & Exercise Medicine2024; 10: e001728.
30.
AndersonLFlanniganCPolychronopoulosP, et al.Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: insights into effective training strategies for physical development in football. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 403–413.
31.
RebeloAMartinhoDVValente-Dos-SantosJ, et al.From data to action: a scoping review of wearable technologies and biomechanical assessments informing injury prevention strategies in sport. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2023; 15: 169.
32.
KohnMJChadwickKASteinmanLE. Adapting evidence-based falls prevention programs for remote delivery - implementation insights through the RE-AIM evaluation framework to promote health equity. Prevention Sci2023: 1–11.
33.
BlanchfieldJMcArdleJHaugheyT. Sports coaching in an online space: what can we learn from endurance sport coaches?Int Sport Coach J2023; 10: 328–339.
34.
WashifJAHettingaFJAmmarA, et al.Supporting athletes during a challenging situation: recommendations from a global insight of COVID-19 home-based training experience. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2024; 16: 83.
35.
StoltzfusMKaurAChawlaA, et al.The role of telemedicine in healthcare: an overview and update. Egypt J Intern Med2023; 35: 49.
36.
SuZLiCFuH, et al.Development and prospect of telemedicine. Intelligent Medicine2024; 4: 1–9.
37.
LalHMohantaSKumarJ, et al.Telemedicine-Rehabilitation and virtual reality in orthopaedics and sports medicine. Indian J Orthop2023; 57: 7–19.
38.
KimBIPeairsELanderS, et al.Telehealth physical therapy for sports medicine rehabilitation: what is its role in the postpandemic era?Orthop J Sports Med2022; 10: 23259671221127721.
39.
ToondersSAJvdMHAThijsv, et al.Effectiveness of remote physiotherapeutic e-health interventions on pain in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil2023; 45: 3620–3638.
40.
DaveriMFuscoACortisC, et al.Effectiveness of different modalities of remote online training in young healthy males. 2022; 10: 170.
41.
StowersLFernandezJJIJSEM. The effect of remote training during COVID-19 quarantine on body composition changes in collegiate football players. 2021; 7: 199.
42.
De FazioRMastronardiVMDe VittorioM, et al.Wearable sensors and smart devices to monitor rehabilitation parameters and sports performance: an overview. 2023; 23: 1856.
43.
SeçkinAÇAteşBSeçkinM. Review on wearable technology in sports: concepts. Challenges and Opportunities2023; 13: 10399.
44.
VeeckFGrazioliROliveiraGS, et al.An online training program was effective on improving physical performance and body composition in u20 soccer players during the COVID-19 quarantine. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice2025; 33: 33–33.
45.
FucarinoAFabbrizioAGarridoND, et al.Emerging technologies and open-source platforms for remote physical exercise: innovations and opportunities for healthy population—A narrative review. Healthcare2024; 12: 1466.
46.
CostaRRGDornelesJRVelosoJH, et al.Synchronous and asynchronous tele-exercise during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: comparisons of implementation and training load in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Telemed Telecare.2023; 29: 308–317.
47.
AssociationWM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama2013; 310: 2191–2194.
48.
HachanaYChaabèneHNabliMA, et al.Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 2752–2759.
49.
BrahimMBBougatfaRMohamedA. Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of a new multi-change of directionagility test for soccer players. Advances in Physical Education2013; 03: 190–196.
50.
YoungWRussellABurgeP, et al.The use of sprint tests for assessment of speed qualities of elite Australian rules footballers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2008; 3: 199–206.
51.
DatsonNLolliLDrustB, et al.Inter-methodological quantification of the target change for performance test outcomes relevant to elite female soccer players. Science and Medicine in Football2022; 6: 248–261.
52.
Mayorga-VegaDAguilar-SotoPVicianaJ. Criterion-Related validity of the 20-M shuttle run test for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci Med2015; 14: 536–547.
53.
AzizARTanFHTehKC. A pilot study comparing two field tests with the treadmill run test in soccer players. J Sports Sci Med2005; 4: 105–112.
54.
OttenRWhiteleyRMitchellT. Effect of subject restraint and resistance pad placement on isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength: implications for testing and rehabilitation. Sports Health2013; 5: 137–142.
55.
AnnibaliniGContarelliSLucertiniF, et al.Muscle and systemic molecular responses to a single flywheel based iso-inertial training session in resistance-trained men. Front Physiol.2019; 10: 554–554.
56.
ScherrJWolfarthBChristleJW, et al.Associations between borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol2013; 113: 147–155.
57.
TrajkovićNGušićMMolnarS, et al.Short-Term FIFA 11+ improves agility and jump performance in young soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 2017.
58.
RomanoVTuziMDi GregorioA, et al.Correlation between official and common field-based fitness tests in elite soccer referees. J Funct Morphol Kinesiology2021; 6: 59.
59.
Presti DLCarnevaleAD'AbbraccioJ, et al.A multi-parametric wearable system to monitor neck movements and respiratory frequency of computer workers. Sensors2020; 20: 536–536.
60.
Pomares-NogueraCAyalaFRobles-PalazónFJ, et al.Training effects of the FIFA 11+ kids on physical performance in youth football players: a randomized control trial. Front Pediatr2018; 6: 6–40.
61.
Vazini TaherAParnowA. Level of functional capacities following soccer-specific warm-up methods among elite collegiate soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2017; 57: 537–542.
62.
StergiouMCalvoALForelliF. Effectiveness of neuromuscular training in preventing lower limb soccer injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med.2025; 14: 1714.
63.
StøvlandVRAmundsenRPaulsenG, et al.Prepare to fail or failing to prepare? Acute performance after the 11 + with and without strength exercises. BMJ open Sport & Exercise Medicine2023; 9: e001634.
64.
Mendez-RebolledoGFigueroa-UretaRMoya-MuraF, et al.The protective effect of neuromuscular training on the medial tibial stress syndrome in youth female track-and-field athletes: a clinical trial and cohort study. J Sport Rehabil2021; 30: 1019–1027.
65.
PattiAGiustinoVCataldiS, et al.Effects of 5-week of FIFA 11+ warm-up program on explosive strength, speed, and perception of physical exertion in elite female futsal athletes. 2022; 10: 100.
66.
SelmiMASassiRHYahmedMH, et al.Normative data and physical determinants of multiple sprint sets in young soccer players aged 11–18 years: effect of maturity Status. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 506–515.
67.
BorgesLDermargosAGorjãoR, et al.Updating futsal physiology, immune system, and performance. Res Sports Med2022; 30: 659–676.
68.
VetriselvanKKumarS. Efficacy of FIFA 11+ training program on performance and functional movement in collegiate football players. Indian J Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy2024; 18: 249–253.
69.
ZhouXLuoAWangY, et al.The effect of FIFA 11 + on the isometric strength and running ability of young soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 13186–13186.
70.
SoussiBHorváthTLaczaZ, et al.The effect of the FIFA 11+ warm-up program on knee instability and motor performance in male youth soccer players. Sensors2025; 25: 2425.
71.
HughesDCEllefsenSBaarK. Adaptations to endurance and strength training. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med2018; 8: a029769.
72.
FisherJP. Supervision during strength training—the interplay with facilitation, feedback and attentional focus: a narrative review. Sports Med2025; 55: 1135–1143.
73.
KalinowskiPMyszkowskiJMarynowiczJ. Effect of online training during the COVID-19 quarantine on the aerobic capacity of youth soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2021; 18: 6195.
74.
FucarinoAZimatoreGFabbrizioA, et al.Fitness and psychological effects of tele-exercise in healthy populations. Preliminary studyFront Digit Health. 2024; 6: 1496196.
75.
IulianoEZimatoreGFabbrizioA, et al.Tele-exercise for fitness: physical and psychological outcomes in athletes and non-athletes’ trainees. Healthcare2025; 13: 354–354.
76.
Pino-OrtegaJRojas-ValverdeDGómez-CarmonaCD, et al.Training design, performance analysis, and talent identification—A systematic review about the most relevant variables through the principal component analysis in soccer, basketball, and rugby. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2021; 18: 2642.
77.
AyalaFPomares-NogueraCRobles-PalazónFJ, et al.Training effects of the FIFA 11 + and harmoknee on several neuromuscular parameters of physical performance measures. Int J Sports Med2017; 38: 278–289.
78.
AndrenelliENegriniFde SireA, et al.Systematic rapid living review on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19: update to may 31st, 2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2020; 56: 508–514.
79.
de SireAAndrenelliENegriniF, et al.Rehabilitation and COVID-19: the cochrane rehabilitation 2020 rapid living systematic review. Update as of August 31st, 2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2020; 56: 839–845.
80.
de SireAAndrenelliENegriniF, et al.Rehabilitation and COVID-19: a rapid living systematic review by cochrane rehabilitation field updated as of December 31st, 2020 and synthesis of the scientific literature of 2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2021; 57: 181–188.
