Abstract
Background
The closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST) is widely used to assess shoulder stability. The modified CKCUEST (mCKCUEST) incorporates height-normalized hand spacing (50%) to account for individual anthropometric variations and improve biomechanical validity.
Objective
To establish normative reference values for mCKCUEST performance in healthy Indian adults and to define diagnostic thresholds and performance phenotypes using percentile classification, ROC analysis, and clustering techniques.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 517 physically active participants (53.6% females) aged 18–28 years. Each participant completed three mCKCUEST trials. Mean, relative (touches/meter), and power scores were calculated. Percentile ranks were stratified by sex. ROC analysis assessed discriminatory cut-offs, while k-means clustering was used to identify phenotypic subgroups. An adaptation index (Trial 3–Trial 1) was computed to evaluate neuromuscular responsiveness.
Results
The mean mCKCUEST score was 17.6 ± 2.3 repetitions with a relative score of 10.5 ± 1.5 touches/meter and a power score of 56.2 ± 11.9. Males performed better than females in Trials 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). No significant correlations were observed between anthropometric variables and performance outcomes. K-means clustering revealed three distinct performance phenotypes, including one with low baseline scores but high neuromuscular adaptability. BMI-based stratification showed most participants were in the normal range (72.5%).
Conclusion
This study provides normative benchmarks for mCKCUEST in healthy Indian adults. The integration of percentile norms, BMI stratification, and adaptation-based phenotypes enhances individualized interpretation in clinical and performance assessment settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
