Prior studies showing the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with plantar fasciitis are mostly based on patient-reported measurements.
Objective
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of ESWT with ultrasonographic and pedobarographic measurements.
Methods
A total of 50 patients were included in the study. All patients were evaluated before and six weeks after ESWT treatment. Pain was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional status with Foot Function Index (FFI), and quality of life with Short Form-36 (SF-36). Plantar pressure measurements were made with a pedobarography device, and plantar fascia thickness was measured with ultrasonography.
Results
After treatment, VAS-Pain decreased significantly. There was a statistically significant improvement in FFI scores after treatment. Similarly, a statistically significant improvement was seen in SF-36 scores. There was a significant decrease in ultrasonographic measurements of the plantar fascia thickness in the origo and midsection regions. There was a statistically significant decrease only in medial heel pressure measurements.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that ESWT provides symptomatic and functional improvements in patients with plantar fasciitis as well as ultrasonographic plantar fascia thickness and pedobarographic medial heel pressure measurements.
FinkenstaedtTSiriwanarangsunPStatumS, et al.The calcaneal crescent in patients with and without plantar fasciitis: an ankle MRI study. AJR Am J Roentgenol2018; 211: 1075–1082.
ThomasJLChristensenJCKravitzSR, , et al.The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: a clinical practice guideline-revision 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg2010; 49(Suppl): S1–19.
12.
RoxasM. Plantar fasciitis: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations. Altern Med Rev2005; 10: 83–93.
13.
ShettyVDDhillonMHegdeC, et al.A study to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy with platelet-rich plasma therapy in recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Surg2014; 20: 10–13.
14.
LouJWangSLiuS, et al.Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia in patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96: 529–534.
15.
KonjenNNapnarkTJanchaiS. A comparison of the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai2015; 98: 49–56.
16.
CheingGLYChangHLoSK. A comparison of the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave and ultrasound therapy in the management of heel pain. Shockwaves2007; 17: 195–201.
17.
OgdenJAAlvarezRGLevittRL, et al.Electrohydraulic high-energy shock-wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86-A : 2216–2228.
18.
LeãoRGAzumaMMAmbrosioGHC, et al.Effectiveness of shockwave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Acta Ortop Bras2020; 28: 7–11.
19.
ChangKVChenSYChenWS, et al.Comparative effectiveness of focused shock wave therapy of different intensity levels and radial shock wave therapy for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012; 93: 1259–1268.
20.
KudoPDaintyKClarfieldM, et al.Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial evaluating the treatment of plantar fasciitis with an extracoporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) device: a North American confirmatory study. J Orthop Res2006; 24: 115–123.
21.
PriceDDMcGrathPARafiiA, et al.The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain1983; 17: 45–56.
22.
Budiman-MakEConradKJMazzaJ, et al.A review of the foot function index and the foot function index–revised. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research2013; 6: 5.
23.
LandorfKBKeenanA-M. An evaluation of two foot-specific, health-related quality-of life measuring instruments. Foot & Ankle International2002; 23: 538–546.
24.
YalımanAŞenEİEskiyurtN. Ayak fonksiyon İndeksinin plantar fasiitli hastalarda türkçe’ye Çeviri ve adaptasyonu. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation2014; 60: 212–222.
25.
WareJEKosinskiMBaylissM, et al.Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Medical Care1995; 33: 264–279.
26.
KoçyiğitHAydemirÖFişekG, et al.Kısa form-36 (KF-36)’nın türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi1999; 12: 102–106.
27.
LiangHWWangTGChenWS, et al.Thinner plantar fascia predicts decreased pain after extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res2007; 460: 219–225.
28.
HsuWHYuPALaiLJ, et al.Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on passive ankle stiffness in patients with plantar fasciopathy. J Foot Ankle Surg2018; 57: 15–18.
29.
SchmitzCCsászárNBMilzS, et al.Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull2015; 116: 115–138.
30.
OzdemirHYilmazEMuratA, et al.Sonographic evaluation of plantar fasciitis and relation to body mass index. Eur J Radiol2005; 54: 443–447.
31.
HuertaJPGarcíaJMAMatamorosEC, et al.Relationship of body mass index, ankle dorsiflexion, and foot pronation on plantar fascia thickness in healthy, asymptomatic subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc2008; 98: 379–385.
32.
ŞasSKoçakFA. Evaluation of the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Ahi Evran Med J2020; 4: 1–5.
33.
McMillanAMLandorfKBBarrettJT, et al.Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res2009; 2: 32.
34.
HammerDSAdamFKreutzA, et al.Ultrasonographic evaluation at 6-month follow-up of plantar fasciitis after extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2005; 125: 6–9.
35.
AndrosoniRNettoAAMacedoRR, et al.Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with extra corporeal shock wave therapy: ultrasonographic morphological aspect and functional evaluation. Rev Bras Ortop2013; 48: 538–544.
36.
HsuWLaiLChangH, et al.Effect of shockwave therapy on plantar fasciopathy. Bone Joint J2013; 95: 1088–1093.
37.
ErdemirAHamelAJFauthAR, et al.Dynamic loading of the plantar aponeurosis in walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86: 546–552.
38.
WearingSCSmeathersJEUrrySR. The effect of plantar fasciitis on vertical footground reaction force. Clin Orthop Relat Res2003; 409: 175–185.
39.
AbtTHopfenmullerWMellerowiczH. Shock wave therapy for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis with heel spur: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb2002; 140: 548–554.
40.
GadallaNKichouhMBouletC, et al.Sonographic evaluation of the plantar fascia in asymptomatic subjects. JBR-BTR2014; 97: 271–273.
41.
RiddleDLPulisicMPidcoeP, et al.Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study. J Bone Jt Surg2003; 85: 872–877.
42.
AbulKOzerDSakizliogluSS, et al.Detection of normal plantar fascia thickness in adults via the ultrasonographic method. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc2015; 105: 8–13.
43.
HuertaJPGarciaJMA. Effect of gender, age and anthropometric variables on plantar fascia thickness at different locations in asymptomatic subjects. Eur J Radiol2007; 62: 449–453.
44.
TaşS. Effect of gender on mechanical properties of the plantar fascia and heel fat pad. Foot Ankle Spec2017; 11: 403–409.
45.
LapidusPGuidottiF. Painful heel: report of 323 patients with 364 painful heels. Clin Orthop Relat Res1965; 39: 178–186.
46.
TauntonJRyanMBClementD, et al.A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sport Med2002; 36: 95–101.
47.
FraserJJGlavianoNRHertelJ. Utilization of physical therapy intervention among patients with plantar fasciitis in the United States. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther2017; 47: 49–55.
48.
HansenLKroghTPEllingsenT, et al.Long-term prognosis of plantar fasciitis: a 5- to 15-year follow-up study of 174 patients with ultrasound examination. Orthop J Sport Med2018; 6: 1–9.
