This article examines the importance of integrating culturally responsive teaching practices in classrooms for students who are culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). It highlights strategies supported by empirical research that amplify student voices through dialogue circles and flexible grouping. Acknowledging the strengths and needs of these students, the inclusive, student-centered approach aims to enhance academic and social success, supporting a sense of belonging and empowerment essential for the growth and well-being of CLD students with EBD.
AcevesT. C.KennedyM. J.(Eds.). (2024). High-leverage practices for students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.
2.
BainesA.MedinaD.HealyC. (2023). Amplify student voices: Equitable practices to build confidence in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
BarnesK.TaylorA.Cooley-NicholsS.HunterW. (2023). Shifting from solo artist to collaboration: Establishing an authentic learning community for culturally and linguistically diverse students identified with emotional behavior. Council for Exceptional Children.
Boyes-WatsonC.PranisK. (2015). Circle forward: Building a restorative school community. Living Justice Press.
6.
BradleyR.DoolittleJ.BartolottaR. (2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9058-6
7.
BrandtL.LiuS.HeimC.HeinzA. (2022). The effects of social isolation stress and discrimination on mental health. Translational Psychiatry, 12(1), 398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02178-4
8.
CastleS.Baker DenizC.TortoraM. (2005). Flexible grouping and student learning in a high-needs school. Education and Urban Society, 37(2), 139–150.
9.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous Classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
ConnerJ.PosnerM.NsowaaB. (2022). The relationship between student voice and student engagement in urban high schools. The Urban Review, 54(5), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00637-2
FreyA. (2002). Predictors of placement recommendations for children with behavioral or emotional disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290202700204
14.
GayG. (2013a). Culturally responsive teaching principles, practices, and effects. In MilnerR. H.Kofi LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (1st ed., pp. 353–372). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094280
HammondZ. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin.
HofmannV.MüllerC. M. (2021). Peer influence on aggression at school: How vulnerable are higher risk adolescents?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 29(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426620917225
19.
HunterW. (2020). Flexible grouping for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Today, 36(4), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2021-0007
20.
HunterW.MaheadyL.JasperA.WilliamsonR.MurleyR.StrattonE. (2015). Numbered heads together as a tier 1 instructional strategy in multitiered systems of support. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(3), 345–362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44684070
21.
KeddieA. (2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.977806
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
MagillK.RodriguezA. (2019). Culture circles as a practice of freedom. In FranklinA.PecoreJ.BohanC. H. (Eds.), Curriculum and teaching dialogue (Vol. 21, pp. 53–70). Information Age Publishing.
27.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM.-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
28.
ParkerC.BickmoreK. (2020). Classroom peace circles: Teachers’ professional learning and implementation of restorative dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103129
RathS.BarnesK.HilliardL.DuhartB.MartinR. (2024). Educator preparation: Exploring the hidden dynamics within inclusive preservice programs. In BennettG.GoodallE. (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of disability (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature Switzerland.
31.
ScottT. M. (2007). Positive behavior support in the classroom: Facilitating behaviorally inclusive learning environments. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 3(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100800
32.
ShepherdT. L.LinnD. (2014). Behavior and classroom management in the multicultural classroom. SAGE.
33.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_03
34.
Van der Worp-van der KampL.BijstraJ. O.PijlS. J.PostW. J.MinnaertA. E. M. G. (2018). The amount of instruction provided by teachers versus the amount of instruction actually received by their students in special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(4), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1373495
35.
ZhangD.KatsiyannisA. (2020). Minority representation in special education: A persistent challenge. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230030601
36.
ZhangD.KatsiyannisA.JuS.RobertsE. (2014). Minority representation in special education: 5-year trends. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9698-6
