Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Automaticity in discrete skills is vital to developing proficiency in the higher-order abilities necessary for successful school, work, and social outcomes. Unfortunately, many students struggle with this automaticity. Strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR) is an efficient flashcard intervention that improves discrete skill acquisition. This article provides information on SIR, the evidence behind its effectiveness, and guidance on how to implement SIR to promote discrete skill development.

Keywords

foundational skills mathematics reading specific learning disability flashcard procedure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

S. R.

Maki

K. E.

(2023). Differential effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of drill-based interventions targeting multiplication facts. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 2520–2539. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22880

Archer

A. L.

Hughes

C. A.

(2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford.

Baker

A. T.

Cuevas

(2018). The importance of automaticity development in mathematics. Georgia Educational Researcher, 14(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2018.140202

Berg

Causey

Cohen

Randolph

Shapiro

(2024). Current term enrollment estimates: Fall 2023. National Student Clearinghouse Research.

Berman

(2009, February 25). Supporting adolescent literacy achievement [Issue Brief]. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.

Berninger

V. W.

Winn

W. D.

(2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthur

C. A.

Graham

Fitzgerald

(Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). Guilford.

Burns

M. K.

(2004). Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. Remedial and Special Education, 25(3), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250030401

Codding

R. S.

Peltier

Campbell

(2023). Introducing the science of math. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 56(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221121721

Daly

E. J.

III Hintze

J. M.

Hamler

K. R.

(2000). Improving practice by taking steps towards technological improvements in academic intervention in the new millennium. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200001)37:1%3C61::AID-PITS7%3E3.0.CO;2-%23

10.

DeWalt

D. A.

Hink

(2009). Health literacy and child health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics, 124, S265–S274. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1162b

11.

Ehri

L. C.

(1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Literacy Research, 19(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968709547585

12.

Ehri

L. C.

Nunes

S. R.

Stahl

S. A.

Willows

D. M.

(2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393

13.

Elliott

T.-C. C.

Mercado Baez

A. N.

Ardoin

S. P.

(2023). A comparison of individual and group strategic incremental rehearsal to teach letter identification to preschoolers. Journal of Behavioral Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09518-4

14.

Filderman

M. J.

Toste

J. R.

(2018). Decisions, decisions, decisions: Using data to make instructional decisions for struggling readers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(3), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917740701

15.

Foorman

Beyler

Borradaile

Coyne

Denton

C. A.

Dimino

Furgeson

Hayes

Henke

Justice

Keating

Lewis

Sattar

Streke

Wagner

Wissel

(2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016–4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides

16.

Fry

Braga

Parker

(2024). Is college worth it? Pew Research Center.

17.

Fuchs

L. S.

Deno

S. L.

(1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299105700603

18.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2009). On the importance of a unified model of responsiveness to intervention. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00074.x

19.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Hamlett

C. L.

Walz

Germann

(1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1993.12085636

20.

Fuchs

L. S.

Newman-Gonchar

Schumacher

Douherty

Bucka

Karp

K. S.

Woodward

Clarke

Jordan

N. C.

Gersten

Jayanthi

Keating

Morgan

(2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades (WWC 2021006). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides

21.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

22.

Haith

A. M.

Krakauer

J. W.

(2018). The multiple effects of practice: Skill, habit, and reduced cognitive load. Current Opinion in Behavioral Science, 20, 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.015

23.

Hammill

D. D.

(2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000405

24.

Hathaway

K. L.

Schieltz

K. M.

Detrick

(2021). Evaluating the effects of instructional prompts and strategic incremental rehearsal on the letter identification mastery of two typically developing kindergarteners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00456-5

25.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)

26.

January

S.-A. A.

Lovelace

M. E.

Foster

T. E.

Ardoin

S. P.

(2017). A comparison of two flashcard interventions for teaching sight words to early readers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9263-2

27.

Kearns

D. M.

(2016). Student progress monitoring tool for data collection and graphing [Computer software]. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Intensive Intervention.

28.

Kim

Y. S. G.

Petscher

Scchatschneider

Foorman

B. R.

(2010). Does growth in oral reading fluency matter in reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1013/a0019643

29.

Kupzyk

Daly

E. J.

III Anderson

M. N.

(2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781

30.

Lozy

E. D.

Donaldson

J. M.

(2019). A comparison of traditional drill and strategic incremental rehearsal flashcard methods to teach letter-sound correspondence. Behavioral Development, 24(2), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000089

31.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2021). Breaking down the DBI process: Questions and considerations. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.

32.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext.ED500486.pdfs

33.

National Reading Panel & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U. S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

34.

Novelli

Ardoin

S. P.

(2024). Teaching foundational skills using strategic incremental rehearsal: Investigating effectiveness across varying school agents. Psychology in the Schools, 61(11), 4414–4442. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23292

35.

Novelli

Ardoin

S. P.

Rodgers

D. B.

(2023). Seeing the mouth: The importance of articulatory gestures during phonics training. Reading and Writing. Advance online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10487-3

36.

Perfetti

C. A.

(2017). Lexical quality revisited. In Segers

van den Broek

(Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 51–67). John Benjamins.

37.

Powell

S. R.

Bouck

E. C.

Sutherland

Clarke

Arsenault

T. L.

Freeman-Green

(2023). Essential components of math instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 56(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.117/00400599221125892

38.

Price

G. R.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

Ansari

(2013). Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2936-12.2013

39.

Roembke

T. C.

Hazeltine

Reed

D. K.

McMurray

(2021). Automaticity as an independent trait in predicting reading outcomes in middle-school. Developmental Psychology, 57(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001153

40.

D. L.

(1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of Reading Acquisition. Cognition, 5(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2

41.

Skinner

C. H.

Fowler

Cates

G. L.

Poncy

Duhon

G. J.

Solomon

B. G.

Belfiore

P. J.

(2023). Improving learning science: Evaluating and comparing academic interventions using measures of learning speed. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 3329–3350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22931

42.

Stecker

P. M.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113

43.

Tavani

C. M.

Losh

S. C.

(2003). Motivation, self-confidence, and expectations as predictors of the academic performances among our high school students. Child Study Journal, 33(3), 141–151.

44.

Treiman

Pennington

B. F.

Shriberg

L. D.

Boada

(2008). Which children benefit from letter names in learning letter sounds? Cognition, 106(3), 1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.006

45.

U.S. Department of Education. (2022a). Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2022 Mathematics Assessment.

46.

U.S. Department of Education. (2022b). Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2022 Reading Assessment.

47.

Zaslofsky

A. F.

Scholin

S. E.

Burns

M. K.

Varma

(2016). Comparison of opportunities to respond and generation effect as potential causal mechanisms for incremental rehearsal with multiplication combinations. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.01.001

Mastering Discrete Skills Through Strategic Incremental Rehearsal

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References