Students with learning disabilities tend to focus on lower-level elements of writing, leading them to compose poorly organized paragraphs comprised of strings of linear ideas. Deficits in language and working memory negatively impact ability to produce quality writing. Technology and software applications can provide a means of academic supports for students with disabilities. Four productivity applications (i.e., apps) that encourage focusing on higher-order writing skills and support cognitive load are presented for use with secondary students. These apps are combined to provide teachers with a step-by-step technique for instructing students to write a quality expository paragraph.
BakerS.GerstenR.GrahamS. (2003). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: Research-based applications and examples. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 109–123.
2.
BooneR.HigginsK. (2015). Refocusing instructional design. In EdyburnD. L. (Ed.), Accessible instructional design (pp. 83–104). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
3.
DexterD.HughesC. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 51–72.
4.
EnglertC. S.ZhaoY.DunsmoreK.CollingsY.WolbersK. (2007). Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an Internet-based technology to improve performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 9–29.
5.
GilbertJ.GrahamS. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518. doi:10.1086/651193
6.
GillespieA.GrahamS. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 4, 454–473.
7.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2009). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all withThe Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 58–68.
8.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2013). Common Core State Standards, writing, and students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 28–37. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12004
9.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2016). A path to better writing. Reading Teacher, 69, 359–365. doi:10.1002/trtr.1432
10.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.HebertM. (2011). It is more than just the message: Analysis of presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12.
11.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2013). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 405–438). New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.SantangeloT. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 498–522. doi:10.1086/681964
13.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS.HarrisK. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.
14.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school: A report to the Carnegie Corporation. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
15.
GreerD. L.CrutchfieldS. A.WoodsK. L. (2013). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning, Instructional design principles, and students with learning disabilities in computer-based and online learning environments. Journal of Education, 193(2), 1–48.
16.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MasonL. (2002). POW plus TREE equals powerful opinion essays. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14(4), 74–79.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author.
Peterson-KarlanG. R. (2015). Assistive technology instruction within a continuously evolving technology environment. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 61–76.
23.
StraubC.AliasC. (2013). Next generation writing at the secondary level for students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 16–24.
24.
SwansonH. L.SiegelL. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 1–48. doi:10.1177/002221940003300604
25.
SwordH. (2015). The writer’s diet. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press.
26.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2011). Writing 2011: National assessment of educational progress at grades 8 and 12 (Report No. NCE2 2012-470). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
27.
VanderbergR.SwansonH. L. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process?Reading & Writing, 20, 721–752. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6
28.
WongB. Y. L. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 140–159. doi:10.2307/1511220
