Vocabulary knowledge is an important foundation skill for reading across all subject areas. Because students with disabilities lag behind their peers in reading skills, there is a need for efficient and effective vocabulary interventions. Focusing on morpheme knowledge is one efficient approach to building vocabulary. This article describes an intervention package that combines several evidence-based techniques, including explicit instruction, fluency drills, self-graphing, and peer mediation, to increase morpheme knowledge.
AlbersC. A.HoffmanA. (2012). Using flashcard drill methods and self-graphing procedures to improve the reading performance of English language learners. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(4), 367–388.
2.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. Elementary School Journal, 107, 251–271.
3.
CoxheadA. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
4.
CiulloS.FalcomataT.VaughnS. (2015). Teaching social studies to upper elementary students with learning disabilities: Graphic organizers and explicit instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 15–26.
5.
DrazeD. (2005). Red hot root words book 1: Mastering vocabulary with prefixes, suffixes and root words. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
6.
FishleyK. M.HesslerT.KonradM. (2016). Effects of GO FASTER on morpheme definition fluency of high school students with high incidence disabilities. Manuscript in preparation.
7.
FishleyK. M.KonradM.HesslerT.KeeseyS. (2012). Effects of GO FASTER on morpheme definition fluency for high school students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 104–115.
8.
Graham-DayK. J.FishleyK. M.KonradM.PetersM. T.RessaV. A. (2014). Formative instructional practices: How core content teachers can borrow ideas from IDEA. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 69–75.
9.
HiebertE. H.KamilM. L. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
JosephsN. L.JolivetteK. (2016). Effects of peer mediated instruction on the oral reading fluency skills of high school aged struggling readers. Insights Into Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 39–59.
11.
KnightV. F.SmithB.R.SpoonerF.BrowderD. (2012). Using explicit instruction to teach science descriptors to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 378–389.
12.
KubinaR. M.Jr.YurichK. K. L.DuricaK. C.HealyN. M. (2016). Developing behavioral fluency with movement cycles using SAFMEDS. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(1), 120–141.
13.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics (2012). The nation’s report card: Vocabulary results from the 2009 and 2011 NAEP reading assessments (NCES 2013–452). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
15.
PlantC. A. (2015). Word roots. North Bend, OR: The Critical Thinking Co.
16.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.OkoloC. M. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41(2), 1–23.
17.
VargasJ. S. (2013). Behavior analysis for effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
WhiteT. G.GravesM. F.SlaterW. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 281–290.
