When students do not respond adequately to core instruction, teachers must provide instruction and intervention that is more intensive and, therefore, more effective. However, for many educators, it is often unclear what it means to intensify instruction and how intensive instruction differs from high-quality core instruction. This article describes eight empirically supported methods for intensifying instruction for struggling learners along with specific suggestions, examples, and a planning guide for intensive instruction.
BrophyJ. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
CalhoonM. B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424–433. doi:10.1177/00222194050380050501
4.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 62–73. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00008
5.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
6.
FallonL. M.O’KeeffeB. V.SugaiG. (2012). Consideration of culture and context in school-wide positive behavior support: A review of current literature. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 209–219. doi:10.1177/1098300712442242
7.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/ 00346543074001059 .
8.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. doi:10.1177/0040059914522966
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79–92. Retrieved from http://ldq.sagepub.com/content/31/2/79.full.pdf
10.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
GayG. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116. doi:10.1177/0022487102053002003
12.
GoldmanS. R.MertzD. L.PellegrinoJ. W. (1988). Extended practice of basic addition facts: Strategy changes in learning-disabled students. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 223–265. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0503_2
13.
GraneyS.ShinnM. (2005). The effects of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) teacher feedback in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 34, 184–201.
14.
HelfS.CookeN. L.FlowersC. P. (2009). Effects of two grouping conditions on students who are at risk for reading failure. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53, 113–128. doi:10.3200/psfl.53.2.113-128.
15.
HruskaB. J. (2011). Using mastery goals in music to increase student motivation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 30(1), 3–9. doi:10.1177/8755123311418477
16.
JohnsonE.MellardD. F.FuchsD.McKnightM. A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. New York, NY: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496979.pdf
17.
KampsD.AbbottM.GreenwoodC.WillsH.VeerkampM.KaufmanJ. (2008). Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergarten. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 101–114. doi:10.1177/0022219407313412
18.
LeónJ.NúñezJ. L.LiewJ. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning & Individual Differences, 43, 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017
MacSuga-GageA. S.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 211–239. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0009
21.
Manset-WilliamsonG.NelsonJ. M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 59–74. doi:10.2307/4126973
22.
MargolisH.McCabeP. (2006). Motivating struggling readers in an era of mandated instructional practices. Reading Psychology, 27, 435–455.
23.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Implementing intensive intervention: Lessons learned from the field. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. Retrieved from www.intensiveintervention.org
24.
NicolD. J.Macfarlane-DickD. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
25.
PatallE. A.CooperH.RobinsonJ. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
26.
PavlikP.JrBolsterT.WuS. M.KoedingerK.MacwhinneyB. (2008). Using optimally selected drill practice to train basic facts. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 5091, 593–602. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_62
27.
PintrichP. R.SchunkD. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
28.
Robinson-ErvinP.CartledgeG.KeyesS. (2011). Culturally responsive social skills instruction for adolescent black males. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 2161–2412. doi:10.2202/2161-2412.1075
29.
RockM. L.GreggM.EllisE.GableR. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52, 31–47. doi:10.3200/psfl.52.2.31-47
30.
SchutteG. M.DuhonG. J.SolomonB. G.PoncyB. C.MooreK.StoryB. (2015). A comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 149–159. doi:10.1016/J.jsp.2014.12.03
31.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0007
32.
SnyderT. D. (1993). 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov
33.
StevensonN.A. (2016). Effects of planning and goal setting on reducing latency to task engagement for struggling readers in middle school. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 206–222.
34.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237. doi:10.1080/09362830903235375
35.
SugaiG.O’KeeffeB. V.FallonL. M. (2011). A contextual consideration of culture and school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 197–208. doi:10.1177/1098300711426334
36.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200205
37.
Swain-BradwayJ.LomanS. L.VincentC. G. (2014). Systematically addressing discipline disproportionality through the application of a school-wide framework. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 14(1), 3–17.
38.
SwehlaS. E.BurnsM. K.ZaslofskyA. F.HallM. S.VarmaS.VolpeR. J. (2016). Examining the use of spacing effect to increase the efficiency of incremental rehearsal. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 404–415. doi:10.1002/pits.21909
39.
ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E.WotrubaJ. W.AlgozzineB. (1993). Instruction in special education classrooms under varying student-teacher ratios. Elementary School Journal, 93, 305–320. doi:10.1086/461727
40.
TiesoC. L. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26(1), 29–36. doi:10.1080/02783190309554236
41.
TorgesenJ. (2006). Intensive reading instructions for struggling readers in early elementary schools: A principal’s guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Retrieved from www.centeroninstruction.org
42.
TorgesenJ.AlexanderA. W.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.VoellerK. K. S.ConwayT. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58. doi:10.1177/002221940103400104
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.KouzekananiK.BryantD. P.DicksonS.BlozisS. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301–315. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050501
45.
VaughnS.WexlerJ.LerouxA.RobertsG.DentonC. A.BarthA. E.FletcherJ. M. (2011). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 515–525. doi:10.1177/0022219411402692
46.
VincentC. G.RandallC.CartledgeG.TobinT. J.Swain-BradwayJ. (2011). Toward a conceptual integration of cultural responsiveness and schoolwide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(4), 219–229. doi:10.1177/109830071139976
47.
WexlerJ. A.ReedD. K.PyleN.MitchellM.BartonE. E. (2015). A synthesis of peer mediated academic interventions for secondary struggling learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 451–470. doi:10.1177/0022219413504997
