The purpose of the current article is to reintroduce Shapiro and Clemens for the series honoring the anniversary of the journal. Shapiro and Clemens suggests five measurable indicators from three domains that schools could use to evaluate response to intervention frameworks. The article also highlights some accomplishments of our editorial team.
BurnsM. K.ScholinS. E.ZaslofskyA. F. (2011). Advances in assessment through research: What have we learned in the past 3 years. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410395557
2.
ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.ChristT. J. (2009). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) an emerging method for assessing social behavior within a tiered intervention system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409340391
3.
ChristT. J.Riley-TillmanT. C.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Foundation for the development and use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to assess and evaluate student behavior. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(4), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409340390
4.
MastersonJ. J.ApelK. (2010). The spelling sensitivity score: Noting developmental changes in spelling knowledge. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410380039
ShapiroE. S.ClemensN. H. (2009). A conceptual model for evaluating system effects of response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408330080
7.
Spectrum K-12 School Solutions. (2010). Response to intervention adoption survey 2010. Scantron.
