Selecting Universal Screening Measures to Identify Students at Risk Academically

Abstract

Universal screening measures can be used to identify students at risk academically due to learning disabilities or other difficulties. Research and legislation support the use of screening measures early in students’ education to ensure they receive any supports necessary to bolster their academic achievement. When selecting a screening measure, school personnel should identify the purpose of the screening measures in their school and the resources available. The research literature should then be consulted on established screening measures, with careful attention paid to required resources, evaluation of the students as a whole through the consultation of varied sources of information, relative biases of screening measures, further assessments for low-scoring students, and test metrics. This article discusses research-based procedures to follow in selecting screening measures, specifies factors to consider in this process, and provides examples of existing measures for use in the universal screening process.

Keywords

universal screening assessment early identification prevention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Center on Response to Intervention. (2015). Home page. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/

Compton

D. L.

Fuchs

L. S.

Bouton

Gilbert

J. K.

Barquero

L. A.

. . . Crouch

R. C.

(2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–340.

DiPerna

J. C.

Elliott

S. N.

(2000). Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonclinical.com/psychology/products/100000402/academic-competence-evaluation-scales-aces.html

Gansle

K. A.

Noell

G. H.

(2008). Consulting with teachers regarding academic skills: Problem solving for basic skills. Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4(2), 199–211.

Good

R. H.

Kaminski

R. A.

(Eds.) (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/

Gray

McCallum

R. S.

Bain

S. K.

(2009). Language-reduced screening for giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 38–64.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).

iSTEEP. (2009). System to Enhance Educational Performance. Miami, FL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.isteep.com/login.aspx

Kane

S. T.

Roy

Medina

(2013). Identifying college students at-risk for learning disabilities: Evidence for use of the Learning Difficulties Assessment in post-secondary settings. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(1), 21–33.

10.

Kettler

R. J.

(2007). Screening for early learning problems within an urban population: The Brief Academic Competence Evaluation Screening System. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 3, 71–88.

11.

Kettler

R. J.

Elliott

S. N.

(2010). A brief broadband system for screening children at risk for academic difficulties and poor achievement test performance: Validity evidence and applications to practice. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 282–307.

12.

Lazarus

P. J.

Ortega

(2007). Universal pre-kindergarten in conjunction with universal screenings: An antidote to grade retention. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 7(1), 54–75.

13.

Lilles

Furlong

Quirk

Felix

Dominguez

Anderson

(2009). Preliminary development of the Kindergarten Student Entrance Profile. California School Psychologist, 14, 71–80.

14.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2001).

15.

Oakland

Rossen

(2005). A 21st-century model for identifying students for gifted and talented programs in light of national conditions: An emphasis on race and ethnicity. Gifted Child Today, 28(4), 56–64.

16.

Quirk

Furlong

(2014). Kindergarten Student Entrance Profile. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved from http://www.michaelfurlong.info/KSEP_2014/

17.

Scott

M. S.

Delgado

C. F.

(2003). Using educational placement in third grade to select and validate a preschool screening measure. Psychology in the Schools, 40(6), 565–582.

18.

Scott

M. S.

Delgado

C, F.

(2006). Predicting poor achievement in early grade school using kindergarten scores on simple cognitive tasks. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(1), 37–47.

19.

Understood.org. (2015). Understood.org USA LLC. Retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/evaluations/types-of-tests

20.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

(2013). Universal screening may not be for everyone: Using a threshold model as a smarter way to determine risk. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 402–414.