We surveyed early childhood personnel in the U.S. state of Colorado to explore reported practices during the initial evaluation of young children for early intervention or preschool special education. One hundred early childhood personnel participated. Overall, reported evaluation practices and processes matched recommended practices and met legal guidelines, including gathering information from a variety of sources and the use of a family-guided and team-based approach. Reported challenges included not having enough time to collect information, struggles to arrange the evaluation, difficulties determining eligibility, and systems issues regarding working conditions, training, and collaboration across agencies. Translation and interpretation were the most commonly utilized culturally responsive practices; challenges working with translators and interpreters were noted along with the need to improve other culturally and linguistically responsive practices. Implications for practice are discussed, including ways to improve the initial evaluation process for all families to assure early identification and timely access to services.
ApplequistK.BaileyD. (2000). Navajo caregivers’ perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(1), 47–61.
2.
BagnatoS. J.McKeating-EsterleE.FevolaA. F.BartalomasiM.NeisworthJ. T. (2008). Valid use of clinical judgment (informed opinion) for early intervention eligibility: Evidence-base and practice characteristics. Infants and Young Children, 21, 334–348.
3.
BaileyD. B.HebbelerK.ScarboroughA.SpikerD.MallikS. (2004). First experiences with early intervention: A national perspective. Pediatrics, 113(4), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.4.887
4.
BanerjeeR.LucknerJ. (2014). Training needs of early childhood professionals who work with children and families who are culturally and linguistically diverse. Infants & Young Children, 27(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000000
5.
BargerB.RiceC.SimmonsC. A.WolfR. (2018). A systematic review of part C early identification studies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416678664
6.
BartonE. E.HarrisB.LeechN.StiffL.ChoiG.JoelT. (2016). An analysis of state autism educational assessment practices and requirements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(3), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2589-0
7.
BenekeM. R.CheathamG. A. (2016). Inclusive, democratic family–professional partnerships: (Re) conceptualizing culture and language in teacher preparation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(4), 234–244.
8.
BethellC.ReulandC.SchorE.AbrahmsM.HalfonN. (2011). Rates of parent-centered developmental screening: Disparities and links to services access. Pediatrics, 128(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0424
9.
BooneH. A.CraisE. (1999). Strategies for achieving: Family driven assessment and intervention planning. Young Exceptional Children, 3(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/109625069900300101
10.
BoyleC. A.BouletS.SchieveL. A.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127(6), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0811
11.
BrickerD.MacyM.SquiresJ.MarksK. (2013). Developmental screening in your community: An integrated approach for connecting children with services. Paul H. Brookes.
12.
BrickerD.Pretti-FrontczakK.JohnsonJ. J.StrakaE. (2007). Assessment and evaluation planning system (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
ClementsK. M.BarfieldW. D.KotelchuckM.WilberN. (2008). Maternal socio-economic and race/ethnic characteristics associated with early intervention participation. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(6), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0291-3
Council for Exceptional Children. (2020). Early intervention / early childhood special education personnel preparation standards. https://www.dec-sped.org/ei-ecse-standards
17.
CraisE. R.RoyV. P.FreeK. (2006). Parents’ and professionals’ perceptions of the implementation of family-centered practices in child assessments. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 15, 365–377.
18.
CraisE. R.WilsonL. B. (1996). The role of parents in child assessment: Self-evaluation by practicing professionals. Infant Toddler Intervention, 6, 125–144.
19.
de Sam LazaroS. L. (2017). The importance of authentic assessments in eligibility determination for infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116689061
20.
DiGuiseppiC.RosenbergS. A.TomchoM. A.ColbornK.HightshoeK.Gutiérrez-RaghunathS.CordovaJ. M.Dooling-LitfinJ. K.RosenbergC. R. (2020). Family navigation to increase evaluation for autism spectrum disorders in toddlers: Screening and linkage to services for autism pragmatic randomized trial. Autism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320974175
DunstC. J.BruderM. B. (2016). Early intervention service coordination models and service coordinator practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510602800301
23.
El-GhorouryN. H.KrackowE. (2012). Enhancing the identification of autism spectrum disorders via a model of culturally sensitive childhood assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027354
24.
EnnisR. P.BlantonK.KatsiyannisA. (2017). Child find activities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Recent case law. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(5), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991665063
25.
FeinbergE.SilversteinM.DonahueS.BlissR. (2011). The impact of race on participation in Part C early intervention services. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(4), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182142fbd
26.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134–2156.
27.
FuranoS.O’ReillyK.HosakaC.InatsukaT. (1994). Hawaii Early Learning Profile (HELP): Checklist (0-3). VORT Corporation.
28.
GisevN.BellJ. S.ChenT. F. (2013). Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 9(3), 330–338.
29.
GlascoeF. P. (2005). Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(3), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20068
30.
Grisham-BrownJ.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2011). Assessing young children in inclusive settings: The blended practices approach. Paul H. Brookes.
31.
HarbinG. L.BruderM. B.AdamsC.MazzarellaC.WhitbreadK.GabbardG.StaffI. (2004). Early intervention service coordination policies: National policy infrastructure. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214040240020401
32.
HornE.JonesH. (2005). Collaboration and teaming in early intervention. In Young exceptional children monograph series: Interdisciplinary teams (Vol. 6, pp. 11–20). Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children.
33.
HughesM. T.Valle-RiestraD. M.ArguellesM. E. (2002). Experiences of Latino families with their child’s special education program. Multicultural Perspectives, 4, 11–17.
34.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400et seq. (2004).
35.
JacksonC. W.TraubR. J.TurnbullA. P. (2008). Parents’ experiences with childhood deafness: Implications for family-centered services. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29(2), 82–98.
36.
KasprzakC.HurthJ.RooneyR.GoodeS. E.DanaherJ. C.WhaleyK. T.CateD. (2012). States’ accountability and progress in serving young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411408119
37.
KlingnerJ.EppollitoA. (2014). English language learners: Differentiating between language acquisition and learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children.
38.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584.
39.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275.
40.
LinderT. W. (2008). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment, second edition (TPBA2). Paul H. Brookes.
41.
LopezE. C. (2000). Conducting instructional consultation through interpreters. School Psychology Review, 29, 378–388.
42.
MacyM.BagnatoS. J. (2010). Keeping it “REAL” with authentic assessment. NHSA Dialog, 13(1), 1–20.
43.
MacyM.MarksK.TowleA. (2014). Missed, misused, or mismanaged: Improving early detection systems to optimize child outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112141525997
44.
MarturanaE.McComishC.WoodsJ.CraisE. (2011). Early intervention teaming and the primary service provider approach: Who does what, when, why, and how?Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 18(2), 47–52.
45.
MatternJ. A. (2015). A mixed-methods study of early intervention implementation in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Supports, services, and policies for young children with developmental delays and disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0633-x
46.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS. (2012). Are minority children disproportionately represented in early intervention and early childhood special education?Educational Researcher, 41(9), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459678
47.
MullenE. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning. AGS.
NolandR. M.GabrielsR. L. (2004). Screening and identifying children with autism spectrum disorders in the public school system: The development of a model process. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000029549.84385.44
51.
PavriS.FowlerS. A. (2001). Child find, screening, and tracking: Serving culturally and linguistically diverse children and families. CLAS Early Childhood Research Institute [Technical Report].
52.
PerleszA.LindsayJ. (2003). Methodological triangulation in researching families: Making sense of dissonant data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 25–40.
53.
Pizur-BarnekowK.EricksonS.JohnstonM.BassT.LucinskiL.BleuelD. (2010). Early identification of developmental delays through surveillance, screening, and diagnostic evaluation. Infants & Young Children, 23(4), 323–330.
54.
RosenbergS. A.ZhangD.RobinsonC. C. (2008). Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics, 121(6), e1503–e1509. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1680
55.
RousB.HallamR.HarbinG.McCormickK.JungL. (2007). The transition process for young children with disabilities: A conceptual framework. Infants and Young Children, 20, 135–148.
56.
RoysircarG. (2005). Culturally sensitive assessment, diagnosis, and guidelines. In ConstantineM. G.SueD. W. (Eds.), Strategies for building multicultural competence in mental health and educational settings (pp. 19–38). John Wiley.
57.
SchoplerE.Van BourgondienM. E.WellmanG. J.LoveS. R. (2010). CARS-2: Childhood Autism Rating Scale–Second Edition. Western Psychological Services.
58.
SimeonssonR. J.EdmondsonR.SmithT.CamahanS.BucyJ. E. (1995). Family involvement in multidisciplinary team evaluation: Professional and parent perspectives. Child: Care, Health and Development, 21(3), 199–214.
VoressJ. K.MaddoxT. (2013). Developmental Assessment of Young Children–Second Edition (DAYC-2). PRO-ED.
61.
WhiteD. E.OelkeN. D.FriesenS. (2012). Management of a large qualitative data set: Establishing trustworthiness of the data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100305
62.
WilliamsM. E.AtkinsM.SolesT. (2009). Assessment of autism in community settings: Discrepancies in classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(4), 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-00800668-1
63.
ZirkelP. A. (2014). Child find: The lore v. the law. West’s Education Law Reporter, 307, 574–580.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
