Even though evidence-based Tier 2 programs are now more commonly available, integrating and sustaining these interventions in schools remain challenging. RE-AIM, which stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, is a public health framework used to maximize the effectiveness of health promotion programs in real-world contexts. The authors describe a Tier 2–specific RE-AIM checklist with criteria related to each RE-AIM dimension. These criteria aim to help school personnel evaluate, select, and adapt social-behavioral interventions to fit into their multitiered systems of support for social-behavioral intervention.
CarterD. R.CarterG. M.JohnsonE. S.PoolJ. L. (2013). Systematic implementation of a Tier 2 behavior intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(4), 223–231. doi:10.1177/1053451212462879
2.
ChamblessD. L.HollonS. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7.
3.
CheneyD. A.FlowerA.TempletonT. (2008). Applying response to intervention metrics in the social domain for students at risk of developing emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 42(2), 108–126.
4.
CheneyD. A.StageS. A.HawkenL. S.LynassL.ChristineM.WaughM. (2009). A 2-year outcome study of the Check, Connect, and Expect Intervention for students at risk for severe behavior problems. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 17(4), 226–243.
5.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
6.
DomitrovichC. E.BradshawC. P.GreenbergM. T.EmbryD.PoduskaJ. M.IalongoN. S. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 71–88.
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263–279.
8.
GreenbergM. T.WeissbergR. P.O’BrienM. U.ZinsJ. E.FredericksL.ResnikH.EliasM. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6), 466–474. doi:10.1037/0003–066x.58.6–7.466
9.
GreshamF. M. (2010). Data-based decision making for students’ social behavior. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 11(2), 149–168.
10.
HawkenL. S.AdolphsonS. L.MacLeodK. S.SchumannJ. (2009). Secondary-tier interventions and supports. In SailorW.DunlopG.SugaiG.HornerR. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 395–420). New York: Springer.
11.
HawkenL. S.JohnstonS. S. (2007). Preventing severe problem behavior in young children: The Behavior Education Program. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4(3), 599–613.
12.
HawkenL. S.MacLeodK. S.RawlingsL. (2007). Effects of the Behavior Education Program (BEP) on office discipline referrals of elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(2), 94–101.
13.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–14.
14.
MasseyO. T.ArmstrongK.BoroughsM.HensonK.McCashL. (2005). Mental health services in schools: A qualitative analysis of challenges to implementation, operation, and sustainability. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 361–372. doi:10.1002/pits.20063
15.
McDanielS. C.FlowerA.CheneyD. A. (2011). Put me in, Coach! A powerful and efficient Tier 2 behavioral intervention for alternative settings. Beyond Behavior, 20(1), 18–24.
16.
NelsonJ. R.HurleyK. D.SynhorstL.EpsteinM. H.StageS.BuckleyJ. (2009). The child outcomes of a behavior model. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 7–30.
17.
StreinW.HoagwoodK.CohnA. (2003). School psychology: a public health perspective: I. Prevention, populations, and systems change. Journal of School Psychology, 41(1), 23.
18.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.GreshamF. M. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In ShinnM. R.WalkerH. M.StonerG. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems: II. Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 315–350). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
19.
VannestK. J.BurkeM. D.SauberS. B.DavisJ. L.DavisC. R. (2011). Daily behavior report cards as evidence-based practice for teachers. Beyond Behavior, 20(2), 13–21.
20.
VolpeR. J.BrieschA. M.GadowK. D. (2011). The efficiency of behavior rating scales to assess inattentive–overactive and oppositional–defiant behaviors: Applying generalizability theory to streamline assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 131–155. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.005
21.
WalkerH. M.SeeleyJ. R.SmallJ.SeversonH. H.GrahamB. A.FeilE. G.FornessS. R. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of the First Step to Success Early Intervention: Demonstration of program efficacy outcomes in a diverse, urban school district. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 17(4), 197–212.
22.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
23.
YongM.CheneyD. (2013). Essential features of Tier 2 social-behavioral interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 844–861.
