HawkenL. S.VincentC. G.SchumannJ. (2008). Response to intervention for social behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 16(4), 213–225.
3.
HooverJ. J. (2010). Special education eligibility decision making in response to intervention models. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 289–296.
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
5.
IngallsL.HammondH. (1996). Prereferral school-based teams: How effective are they?Rural Special Education Quarterly, 15(2), 9–18.
6.
KavaleK. A.KauffmanJ. M.BachmeierR. J.LeFeverG. B. (2008). Response-to-intervention: Separating the rhetoric of self-congratulation from the reality of specific learning disability identification. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(3), 135–150.
7.
LaneK. L. (2007). Identifying and supporting students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders within multi-level models: Data driven approaches to conducting secondary interventions with an academic emphasis. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 135–164.
8.
LegereE. J.ConcaL. M. (2010). Response to intervention by a child with a severe reading disability. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 32–39.
9.
McCookJ. (2006). The RTI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools. Horsham, PA: LRP.
10.
MeyerM. S. (2000). The ability–achievement discrepancy: Does it contribute to an understanding of learning disabilities?Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 315–337.
11.
MuscottH. S.MannE.BenjaminT. B.GatelyS.BellK. E.MuscottA. (2004). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire: Preliminary results of a statewide system for implementing schoolwide discipline practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(4), 453–475.
12.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.
13.
PetersonK. H.ShinnM. R. (2002). Severe discrepancy models: Which best explains school identification practices for learning disabilities?School Psychology Review, 31(4), 459–477.
14.
RiccominiP. J.WitzelB. S. (2009). Response to intervention in math. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
RockM. L.ZigmondN. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance or symbolism?Preventing School Failure, 45(4), 153–161.
16.
StewartR.BennerG.MartellaR.Marchand-MartellaN. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(4), 239–253.