The authors examined the utility of a modified version of the Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders for use at the high school level to address issues of comorbidity. Results suggested that the modified version was able to discriminate among students with varying degrees of risk in terms of academic performance as measured by GPA. In terms of convergent validity, teachers were able to differentiate between the social skills of students rated with typical behaviors and those at risk for externalizing or comorbid behaviors in terms of cooperation, self-control, school adjustment, and empathy skills. Furthermore, teachers were better able to discriminate externalizing behaviors relative to internalizing behaviors. Overall, solely relying on teacher nominations may be sufficient for discriminating between the presence versus absence of risk. However, it may not be sufficient to discriminate among the presence of different types of risk, particularly internalizing behaviors. Limitations and educational implications are discussed.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YRS, & TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
AchenbachT.EdelbrockC. (1993). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.
3.
American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational an psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BloomH.HillC.BlackA. R.LipseyM. (2006, June). Effect sizes in educational research: What they are, what they mean, and why they’re important. Paper presented at the Institute for Educational Sciences 2006 research conference, Washington, DC.
5.
BuskP. L.SerlinR. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In KratochwillT.LevinJ. (Eds.), Single case research design and analysis (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CaldarellaP.YoungE. L.RichardsonM. J.YoungB. J.YoungK. R. (2008). Validation of the Systematic Screening for Behavioral Disorders in middle and junior high school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 105–117.
7.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.StangK. K. (2008). Promoting self-determination for transition-age youth: Views of high school general and special educators. Exceptional Children, 75, 55–70.
8.
CullinanD.SabornieE. J. (2004). Characteristics of emotional disturbance in middle and high school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 157–167.
9.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (2006). Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
11.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
12.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345.
13.
GoodmanR.ScottS. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17–24.
14.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 242–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
GreshamF. M.CookC. R.CrewsS. D.KernL. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 32–46.
16.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System (SSRS). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
HalpernA. S.YovanoffP.DorenB.BenzM. R. (1995). Predicting participation in postsecondary education for school leavers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 151–164.
18.
HatcherL.StepanskiE. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
19.
HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2000). School-wide behavior support: An emerging initiative. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 231–232.
20.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
21.
KauffmanJ. M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (7th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
22.
LandrumT. J.TankersleyM.KauffmanJ. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional and behavioral disorders?Journal of Special Education, 37, 148–156.
23.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford.
24.
LaneK. L. (2007). Identifying and supporting students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders within multi-level models: Data driven approaches to conducting secondary interventions with an academic emphasis. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 135–164.
25.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.MenziesH. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York: Guilford.
26.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ParksR. J.CarterE. W. (2008). Student Risks Screening Scale: Initial evidence for score reliability and validity at the high school level. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 178–190.
27.
LaneK. L.LittleM. A.CaseyA. M.LambertW.WehbyJ. H.WeisenbachJ. L.. (in press). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: How do they compare?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
28.
LaneK. L.LittleA. L.MenziesH. M.LambertW.WehbyJ. H. (in press). Early elementary students with behavioral challenges educated in rural and suburban settings: How do they progress?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
29.
LaneK. L.ParksR. J.KalbergJ. R.CarterE. W. (2007). Student Risk Screening Scale: Initial evidence for score reliability and validity at the middle school level. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 209–222.
30.
LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.GivnerC. C. (2004). Secondary teachers’ views on social competence: Skills essential for success. Journal of Special Education, 38, 174–186.
LaneK. L.WehbyJ.RobertsonE. J.RogersL. (2007). How do different types of high school students respond to positive behavior support programs? Characteristics and responsiveness of teacher-identified students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 3–20.
33.
LanyonR. (2006). Mental health screening: Utility of the psychological screening inventory. Psychological Services, 3, 170–180.
34.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 265–274.
35.
MattisonR. E.HooperS. R.GlassbergL. A. (2002). Three-year course of learning disorders in special education students classified as behavior disordered. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41, 1454–1461.
36.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
37.
MorrisR. J.ShahK.MorrisY. P. (2002). Internalizing behavior disorders. In LaneK. L.GreshamF. M.O’ShaughnessyT. E. (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 223–241). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
MurrayC. (2003). Risk factors, protective factors, vulnerability, and resilience: A framework for understanding and supporting the adult transitions of youth with high-incidence disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 16–26.
39.
NelsonJ. R.BennerG. J.LaneK. L.SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K–12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73.
40.
PressleyM.McCormickC. B. (2006). Child and adolescent development for educators. New York: Guilford.
41.
SeidmanE.AberJ. L.AllenL.FrenchS. E. (1996). The impact of the transition to high school on the self-system and perceived social context of poor urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 489–515.
42.
ShapiroJ. P.BurgoonJ. D.WelkerC. J.CloughJ. B. (2002). Evaluation of the peacemakers program: School-based violence prevention for students in grades four through eight. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 87–100.
43.
SinclairM. F.ChristensonS. L.ThurlowM. L. (2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 465–482.
44.
Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR. (2002). Lost opportunities for intervention: Undetected markers for the development of serious juvenile delinquency. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 69–82.
45.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior supports in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 130–135.
46.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
WagnerM.DavisM. (2006). How are we preparing students with emotional disturbances for the transition to young adulthood? Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 86–98.
48.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H.SumiW. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbance receiving special education services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.
49.
WalkerH. M.McConnellS. R. (1995). Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustments: Adolescent Version. San Diego, CA: Singular.
50.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
