Embedding “Clickers” Into Classroom Instruction

ActivClassroom [Computer software]. Alpharetta, GA: Promethean, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.prometheanworld.com/

Audience Response Systems [Computer hardware and software]. (2010). Clearwater, FL: Padgett Communications. Retrieved from http://pcipro.com/

Blood E. (2010). Effects of student response systems on participation and learning of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 214–228.

Blood E. Neel R. S. (2008). Using Student response systems in lecture-based-instruction: Does it change student engagement and learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 375–383.

Cutts Q. I. Kennedy G. E. (2005). Connecting learning environments using electronic voting systems. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, 42, 181–186.

eInstruction. [Computer software]. Scottsdale, AZ: eInstruction Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.einstruction.com/

Graham C. R. Tripp T. R. Seawright L. Joeckel G. (2007). Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 233–258. Retrieved from http://alh.sagepub.com

Gunter P. L. Denny K. R. (1998). Trends and issues in research regarding academic instruction of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 44–50.

Kam C. D. Sommer B. (2006). Real-time polling technology in a public opinion course. The Teacher, 39, 113–117.

Kennedy G. E. Cutts Q. I. (2005). The association between students’ use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 260–268.

Lerner J. (2003). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching practices. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Lewis T. J. Hudson S. Richter M. Johnson N. (2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 247–259.

Mercer C. D. (1997). Students with learning disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Qwizdom SRS [Computer software]. (2010). Puyallup, WA: Qwizdom, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.qwizdom.com/

Shapiro J. A. (1997). Electronic student response found feasible in large science lecture hall. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(6), 408–412.

SMART Response Interactive Response Systems [Computer hardware and software]. (2011). Calgary, Canada: SMART Technologies. Retrieved from http://smarttech.com/

Sutherland K. S. Alder N. Gunter P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.

Sutherland K. S. Wehby J. H. (2001). Exploring the relation between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.

Turning Point [Computer software and manual]. (2002–2011). Youngstown, OH: Turning Technologies. Retrieved from http://www.turningtechnologies.com/

Wagner M. Friend M. Bursuck W. D. Kutash K. Duchnowski A. J. Sumi C. Epstein M. H. (2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A national perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12–30.