Interactive videoconferencing (IVC) consists of live, synchronous audio and video communication via a computer or digital phone network among sites in different physical locations. Many productive but not always obvious benefits, such as increased learning opportunities, student motivation, and instructor—student communication, are possible through IVC. This article discusses IVC as a useful medium for teaching and learning in higher education teacher preparation programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5—11.
2.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: Bransford, Brown, & Cocking/National Academy Press.
3.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning . Educational Researcher, 18, 32—42.
4.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. ( 1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2—10.
5.
Cole, C., Ray, K., & Zanetis, J. (2004). Videoconferencing for K—12 classrooms: A program development guide. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
6.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 390—441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Falconer, K.B., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (2002). A qualitative analysis of the benefits and limitations of using two-way conferencing technology to supervise pre-service teachers in remote locations. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 368—384.
9.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., et al. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 358—389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Howard, S., Ault, M., Knowlton, H.E., & Swall, R. (1992). Distance education: Promises and cautions for special education. Teacher Education and Special Education , 15, 275—283.
11.
Kennedy, M. (1999). The role of preservice education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 54—85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Knowlton, H.E., Rowland, A., Knowlton, D.S., & Chaffin, J.D. (2005, October). Effects of interactive video conferencing on preservice teacher education students' acquisition of special education knowledge. Paper presented at the Second International Keystone Conference (Interactive Video Conferencing), Indianapolis, IN.
13.
Langone, J., Malone, M., & Clinton, G. (1999). The effects of technology-enhanced anchored instruction on the knowledge of pre-service special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 85—96.
14.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
McDevitt, M.A. (1996). A virtual view: Classroom observations at a distance . Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 191—195.
16.
Rieth, H., Bryant, D., Linzer, C., Colburn, L., Hur, S., Hartman, P., et al. (2003). An analysis of the impact of anchored instruction on teaching and learning activities in two ninth-grade language arts classes . Remedial and Special Education, 24, 173—184.
17.
Rowland, A. (2003). Effects of video conferencing on the quality of teacher education coursework and supervision. Unpublished master's thesis , University of Kansas, Lawrence .
18.
Whitehead, A.N. (1949). The aims of education and other essays. New York: New American Library.
19.
Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Resources and Development, 41(1), 43—58.
