When students are engaged in learning environments that allow for the practice of problem-solving skills, they are able to connect the classroom to the real world. Students with disabilities need to develop the skills of problem solving, and they need to know how to identify a problem, find the answer, and evaluate their choice. This article discusses the use of problem-based learning software to help students with disabilities develop these critical self-directed learning skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agran, M., Blanchard, C., Wehmeyer, M., & Hughes, C. (2002). Increasing problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279—288.
2.
Barrows, H. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a thing as PBL? DistanceEducation, 23, 119—122.
3.
Bridges, E.M., & Hallinger, P. (1997). Using problem-based learning to prepare educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 131—146.
4.
Brown, C. (2005, Fall). Computer software genres that help students think. Kappa Delta Pi, 42—44.
5.
Brown, M. (2005). Access granted: Achieving technological equity in the 21st century. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 105— 118). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
6.
Charney, D., Reder, L., & Kusbit, G. (1990). Goal setting and procedure selection in acquiring computer skills: A comparison of tutorials, problem solving, and learner exploration . Cognition & Instruction, 7, 323—353.
7.
Chung, N., & Gyoung-Sug, R. (2004). The effect of problem-solving instruction on children's creativity and self-efficacy in the teaching of the practical arts subject. Journal of Technology Studies , 30, 116— 122.
8.
Doll, B.,Sands, D., Wehmeyer, M., & Palmer, S. (1996). Promoting the development and acquisition of self-determined behavior. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 65—88). Baltimore: Brookes .
9.
Dopp, J., & Block, T. (2004). High school peer mentoring that works!Council for Exceptional Children, 37, 56—62.
10.
Drake, D. (1993). Student diversity: Implications for classroom teachers. Clearing House (Menasha, Wis. ), 66, 264—267.
11.
Eisenberg, M., & Johnson, D. (1996). Computer skills for information problem-solving: Learning and teaching technology in context. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from ERIC Clearinghouse: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?
12.
Ellis, E.S., & Worthington, L.A. (1994). Research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators (Tech. Rep. No. 5). Eugene: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
13.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T.E., & Anderson, L.M. (1992). Socially mediated instruction: Improving students' knowledge and talk about writing. The Elementary School Journal, 92(4), 411—449.
14.
Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Williams, D. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education . Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(2), 109—115.
15.
Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based leaning. InstructionalScience, 25, 97— 115.
16.
Johnson, S. (2005). Everything bad is good for you. New York: Penguin Books.
17.
King, E.W. (2005). Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 16—20.
18.
Kolb, S., & Stuart, S. (2005). Active problem solving: A model for empowerment . Council for Exceptional Children, 38, 14—20.
19.
Könings, K.D., Wiers, R.W., van de Wiel, M.W.J., & Schmidt, H.G. (2005). Problem-based learning as a valuable educational method for physically disabled teenagers? The discrepancy between theory and practice. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities , 17, 107—117.
20.
Koschmann, T., Myers, A., Feltovich, P., & Barrows, H. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences , 3, 227—264.
21.
Liu, M. (2004). Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 357—379.
22.
Lowther, D., & Morrison, G. (2003). Integrating computers into the problem-solving process. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 95, 33—38.
23.
McKenna, M., & Robinson, R. (1997). Teaching through text. New York: Longman.
24.
Mulholland, R. (2005). Woodshop, technology, and reading!Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 16—19.
25.
Palmer, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2003). Promoting self-determination in early elementary school. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115— 126.
26.
Salend, S. (2005). Using technology to teach about individual differences related to disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 32—38.
27.
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (2001, June). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Retrieved March 15, 2006, from http://crlt.indiana.edu/publications/journals/TR16-01.pdf
28.
Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solving strategies to students with mild mental retardation? Remedial & SpecialEducation, 18, 157—166.
29.
Smedley, T., & Higgins, K. (2005). Virtual technology: Bringing the world into the special education classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic , 41, 114—119.
30.
SuperKids.com. (2006). Retrieved on April 9, 2006, from http://www.superkids.com
31.
Taylor, A. (2005). What employers look for: The skills debate and the fit with youth perceptions. Journal of Education and Work , 18, 201— 218.
32.
Wehman, P. (2006). Life beyond the classroom. Baltimore: Brookes.
33.
Wehmeyer, M. (1995). A career education approach: Self-determination for youth with mild cognitive disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 157—164.
34.
Wehmeyer, M. (2004). Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory . Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 337—359.
35.
Wehmeyer, M. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 113—120.
36.
Wehmeyer, M., & Palmer, S. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 138—144.
37.
Wehmeyer, M., Palmer, S., Agran, M., Mithaug, D., & Martin, J. (2000). Promoting causal agency the self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439—453.
38.
Wehmeyer, M., & Schwartz, M. (1998). The self-determination focus of transition goals for students with mental retardation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 75—86.
39.
Wehmeyer, M., Smith, S., & Davies, D. (2005). Technology use and students with intellectual disability: Universal design for all students. In. D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 309—323). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
40.
Williams, D., Hemstreet, S., Liu, M., & Smith, V. (1998). Examining how middle school students use problem-based learning software. In T. Ottmann and I. Tomek (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ ED-TELECOM 98, 1998, AACE, (pp. 1550—1556). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
41.
Wood, W., Fowler, C., Uphold, N., & Test, D. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 121—146.
42.
Wood, W., Karvonen, M., Test, D., Browder, D., & Algozzine, B. (2004). Promoting student self-determination skills in IEP planning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 8—16.
