One of the greatest challenges faced by school leaders across the United States is the recruitment of high-quality educators, and many programs have been developed to address this problem. This study evaluates one such program. We evaluate the Arkansas Teacher Corps (ATC), an alternative teacher certification program that places teachers in high-needs schools in Arkansas. We measure teacher effectiveness through classroom observations and student surveys. We form our comparison group by matching ATC Fellows with 1–2 similar teachers in the same school who were not certified through ATC. We use multivariate regression to examine differences between ATC Fellows and comparison teachers on multiple dimensions of teaching. Students rate ATC teachers as significantly more effective on teacher-student relationships in class, teacher-student relationships out of class, and class engagement. Third-party observers detect no significant differences.
AndersonA. (2013). Teach for America and symbolic violence: A bourdieuian analysis of education's next quick-fix. The Urban Review, 45(5), 684–700.
2.
AntecolH., ErenO., & OzbeklikS. (2013). The effect of teach for America on the distribution of student achievement in primary school. IZA Discussion Paper # 7296.
BackesB., and HansenM. (2015). Teach for America impact estimates on non-tested student outcomes. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Working Paper 146. Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/WP%20146.pdf
BoydD., GrossmanP., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
13.
BoydD., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantages urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
14.
BrewerT. (2014). Accelerated burnout: How teach for America's academic impact model and theoretical culture of accountability can foster disillusionment among its corps members. Educational Studies, 50, 246–263.
15.
ChenH. (2012). Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application, and advancement. In StroblR., LobermeierO., & HeitmeyerW. (Eds.), Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten für eine demokratische Kultur (17–26). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer VS.
16.
ChettyR., FriedmanJ., & RockoffJ. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17699. Retrieved from http://www.rajchetty.com/chettyfiles/value_added.pdf
17.
ChiangH., ClarkM., & McConnellS. (2014). Supplying disadvantaged schools with effective teachers: Experimental evidence on secondary math teachers from teach for America.Mathematica Policy Research.
18.
ClarkM., ChiangH., SilvaT., McConnellS., SonnenfeldK., ErbeA., & PumaM. (2013). The effectiveness of secondary math teachers from teach for America and the teaching fellows programs (NCEE 2013–4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
CohenJ., & GoldhaberD. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387.
20.
ConstantineJ., PlayerD., SilvaT., HallgrenK., GriderM., & DekeJ. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification, final report (NCEE 2009–4043). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
CowanJ., GoldhaberD., HayesK., & TheobaldR. (2016). Missing elements in the discussion of teacher shortages. Educational Researcher, 45(8), 460–462. doi: 10.3102/0013189X16679145.
22.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392/515
23.
Darling-HammondL., HoltzmanD., GatlinS.J., & HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ846746.pdf
DulgerianD. (2016). The impact of the every student succeeds act on rural schools. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 24(1), 111–138.
26.
EllisV., MaguireM., TrippestadT., LuiY., YangX., & ZeichnerK. (2016). Teaching other people's children, elsewhere, for a while: the rhetoric of a travelling educational reform. Journal of Education Policy, 31(1), 60–80.
27.
GagnonD., & MattinglyM. (2015). State policy responses to ensuring excellent educators in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 30(13), 1–13.
28.
GehlbachH., & BrinkworthM. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387.
GlazermanS., MayerD., & DeckerP. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: The impacts of teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 75–96.
31.
GoldhaberD., & BrewerD. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.
IngersollR. (2003). The teacher shortage: Myth or reality?Educational Horizons, 81(3), 146–152.
35.
KaneT. J., RockoffJ. E., & StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.
36.
King RiceJ. (2003). Teacher quality: understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes.Washington, D.C: Economic Policy Institute.
37.
KlopfensteinK. (2004). The advanced placement expansion of the 1990s: How did traditionally underserved students fare?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(68), 1–15. Retrieved from https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/223/349
38.
LabareeD. (2010). Teach for America and teacher ed: Heads they win, tails we lose. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 48–55.
39.
Laczko-KerrI., & BerlinerD. C. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: a case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37), 1–53.
40.
McGloinC., & GeorgeouN. (2016). “Looks good on your CV”: The sociology of voluntourism recruitment in higher education. Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 403–417. Doi: 10.1177/144078331452416.
RaymondM., FletcherS., & LuqueJ. (2001). Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas.CREDO, Stanford University.
44.
StoddartT., & FlodenR. (1005). Traditional and alternate routes to teacher certification: Issues, assumptions, and misconceptions. (National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.) Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED383697.pdf
WhiteT. (2016). Teach for america's paradoxical diversity initiative: Race, policy, and black teacher displacement in urban public schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(16). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2100
47.
XuZ., HannawayJ., & TaylorC. (2011). Making a difference? The effects of teach for America in high school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 447–469.
48.
YaffeD. (2016). Tackling the teacher shortage. The Education Digest, 81(8), 11–15.
