This study investigated the perceptions of leadership by public school principals with and without special education backgrounds. Utilizing Q-sort methodology, principals sorted 47 leadership statements. Findings indicated prior special education experience was not a predictor of subsequent leadership perceptions. Instead, two factors emerged where one was composed of younger, less educated, less experienced principals in lower-performing schools who valued instructional and transactional leadership and the other was composed of older, more educated, more experienced, and more ethnically diverse principals who worked in higher-performing schools who valued transformational-collaborative leadership. The results suggest principals with and without special education backgrounds follow a developmental path.
AbediJ., & DietelR. (2004). Challenges in the No Child Left Behind act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief, 1–6.
2.
AndersonC., AveryP. G., PedersonP. V., SmithE. S., & SullivanJ.L. (1997). Divergent perspectives on citizenship education: A q-method study and survey of social studies teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 333–364.
3.
AshtonB., & DuncanH. (2012). A beginning rural principal's toolkit: A guide for success. Rural Educator, 34, 19–31.
4.
AveryD., TonidanielS., GriffithK., & QuinonesM. (2003). The impact of multiple measures of leader experience on leader effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 56, 673–679.
5.
BarataP.C. (2007). Abused women's perspectives on the criminal justice system's response to domestic violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 202–215.
6.
BarbutoJ. E.Jr., FritzS., MatkinG. S., & MarxD. B. (2007). “Effects of Gender, Education, and Age upon Leaders' Use of Influence Tactics and Full Range Leadership Behaviors”. Faculty Publications: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department. Paper 40. Accessed at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/40
7.
BarnettK., & McCormickJ (2004). Leadership and individual: Principal-teacher relationships in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 406–434.
8.
BassB.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York: Free Press.
9.
BolgerR. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 37, 662–683.
10.
BolmanL. G., & DealT. E. (2013). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership, 4th edition.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
BoscardinM. (2007). What is special about special education administration? Considerations for school leadership. Exceptionality, 15, 189–200.
12.
BrackenS., & FischelJ. (2006). Assessment of preschool classroom practices: Application of q-sort methodology. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 417–430.
13.
BrownS. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of q methodology in political science.New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
ColeA. L., & KnowlesJ. G. (2009). Researching teaching: Exploring teacher development through reflexive inquiry.Halifax, Nova Scotia: Backalong Books.
15.
ColemanA. (2011). Towards a blended model of leadership for school-based collaborations. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39, 296–316.
16.
Cosman-RossJ. M., & Hiatt-MichaelD. (2005). Adult student motivators at a university satellite campus. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from http://www.eric.ed.gov.
17.
CoxB. (2006). What personality inventories and leadership assessments say about aspiring principals. ERS Spectrum, 24, 13–20.
18.
Darling-HammondL., LaPointeM., MeyersonD., OrrM. T., CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: lessons from exemplary leadership development programs.Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
19.
DennisK. (1993). Looking at reliability and validity through Q covered glasses. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 37–44.
20.
DonnerS. (2001). Using Q-sorts in participatory process: An introduction to the methodology. In KruegerR. A., CaseyM. A., DonnerJ., KirschS., & MaakJ. N. (Eds.) Social analysis: Selected tools and techniques (pp. 24–49). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
21.
ElmoreR. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.Prepared for the Albert Shanker Institute, Washington DC.
22.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114–95 § 114 Stat. 1177.
23.
FriendM., & CookL. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals, 6th edition.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
24.
GarandA. (2014). Perceptions of leadership through the lens of special education administrators and principals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts Amherst.
25.
GoldringR., & TaieS. (2014). Principal Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Principal Follow-Up Survey. First Look. NCES 2014-064. National Center for Education Statistics.
26.
GrayB. (1995). Obstacles to success in educational collaboration. In RigsbyL. C., ReynoldsM. C., & WangM. C. (Eds.), School-community connections exploring issues/or research and practice (pp. 71–100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
GronnP. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 26(2), 141–158.
28.
HallingerP. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329–351.
29.
HallingerP. (2005). Instructional Leadership and the School Principal: A Passing Fancy that Refuses to Fade Away, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 1–20.
30.
HeckR. H., & MarcoulidesG. A. (1993). Principal leadership behaviors and school achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 77(553), 20–28.
31.
HerseyP., BlanchardK.H., & JohnsonD.E. (2012). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources, 10th edition.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
HittD. H., & TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 88, 531–569.
33.
HulpiaH., DevosG., & RosseelY. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 1013–1034.
34.
HulpiaH., DevosG., & Van KeerH. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers' organizational commitment: examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 728–771.
35.
IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 21.0.Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
36.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
37.
JohnsonS., BuschS., & SlateJ. R. (2008). Leadership behaviors of school administrators: Do men and women differ. Paper presented at the National Council of Professional Administration.
38.
KawatraS., & KrishnanV. R. (2004). Impact of gender and transformational leadership on organizational culture. NMIMS Management Review, 16, 1–6.
39.
KorkmazM. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Research Quarterly, 30, 22–54.
40.
KrajweskiB., ConnerN., MurrayV., & WilliamsC. (2004). Veteran advice for new principals. Principal Leadership, 4, 19–24.
41.
LashleyC., & BoscardinM. L. (2003). Special education administration at a crossroads. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 16, 63–75.
42.
LeeM., & HallingerP. (2012). National contexts influencing principals' time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 461–482
43.
LeithwoodK. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, February 1992, 8–12.
44.
LeithwoodK. (2004). Educational leadership. A review of the research. The Laboratory for Student Success (LSS), The Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory, US Department of Education.
45.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 12–129.
46.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). How Leadership Influences Student Learning, (Executive Summary), University of Minnesota and University of Toronto, commissioned by The Wallace Foundation, (downloadable at www.wallacefoundation.org).
47.
LewinK., LippittR., & WhiteR. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”Journal of School Psychology, 10, 271–299.
48.
LittleJ. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership and Management, 23, 401–419.
49.
LouisK., LeithwoodK., WahlstromK., & AndersonS. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
50.
McLeskeyJ., LandersE., WilliamsonP., & HoppeyD. (2012). Are we moving toward education students with disabilities in less restrictive settings?Journal of Special Education, 46, 131–140.
51.
McLeskeyJ., WaldronN., & ReddL. (2014). A case study of a highly effective inclusive elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 48, 59–70.
52.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case Study Research in Education.”San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
MilitelloM., & JansonC. (2007). Socially focused, situationally driven practice: A study of distributed leadership among school principals and counselors. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 409–442.
54.
MosleyJ., BoscardinM. L., & WellsC. (2014). Perceptions of principal attributes in the era of accountability. Journal of School Leadership, 24, 1038–1072.
55.
MumfordM., MarksM., ConnellyM., ZaccaroS., & Reiter-PalmonR. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87–114.
56.
MurphyJ. (2001, November). The changing face of leadership preparation. The School Administrator, 14–17.
57.
PapaF. J., & BaxterI. A. (2005). Dispelling the myths and confirming the truths of the imminent shortage of principals: The case of New York State. Planning and Changing, 36(3-4), 217–234.
58.
PepperK. (2010). Effective principals skillfully balance leadership styles to facilitate student success: A focus for the reauthorization of ESEA. Changing and Planning, 41, 42–56.
59.
PiersonM. R., & HowellE. J. (2013). Two high schools and the road to full inclusion: A comparison study. Improving Schools, 16, 223–231.
60.
ProvostJ., BoscardinM., & WellsC. (2010). Perceptions of Principal Leadership Behaviors in Massachusetts in the Era of Education Reform. Journal of School Leadership, 20, 532–560.
61.
ReichardR., & JohnsonS. (2011). Leader self-development as organizational strategy. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 33–42.
62.
RobinsonV., HohepaM., & LloydC. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why.Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
ShepphardB., HurleyN., & DibbonD. (2010, April–May). Distributed leadership, teacher morale, and teacher enthusiasm: unravelling the leadership pathways to school success. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
66.
SlaterL. (2008). Pathways to building leadership capacity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36, 55–69.
67.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
68.
SpillaneJ. P., & HarrisA. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. British Educational Leadership, Management & Administration Society (BELMAS), 22, 31–34.
69.
StephensonW. (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297–310.
70.
StephensonW. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
71.
TekleselassieA. A., & VillarrealP. I. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251–293.
72.
TudrynP., BoscardinM. L., & WellsC. W. (2016). Distributed leadership through the lens of special education leaders. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 29, 3–22.
73.
ValeskyT. C., & HirthM. A. (1992). Survey of the states: Special education knowledge requirements for school administrators. Exceptional Children, 58, 399–406.
74.
VecchioR., & BoatwrightK. (2002). Preferences for idealized styles of supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 327–342.
75.
WakemanS., BrowderD., FlowersC., & Ahlgrim-DelzellL. (2006). Principals' knowledge of fundamental and current issues in special education. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 153–174.
