In this study, research centered on the degree to which principals felt knowledgeable about basic generic leadership as well as special education functions. Current principals were selected from the 2018 state DOE databases from five states—Georgia, New York, Michigan, Vermont, and Oregon representing a wide demographic base. Ten (10) functions were generic leadership functions such as budget preparation or evaluating teachers while ten (10) others were related to special education such as authorship of Individual Education Plan (IEP’s) or Response to Intervention (RTI) strategies. Data suggest that a moderate difference exists with higher ratings attributed to generic leadership functions.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
2.
BarnettC.Monda-AmayaL. E. (2008). Principals’ knowledge of and attitudes toward inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 19(3), 181–192.doi:10.1177/074193259801900306
BraunH. (2011). Improving education through assessment, innovation and evaluation. InAssessment to improve education in developing Nations (2 ed.,pp.1–68). Spring.
5.
BrownK. C.SquiresJ.Connors-TadrosL.HorovitzM. (2014). What do we know about principal preparation licensure requirements and professional development for school leaders?Center on Enhancing Early Learning Outcomes.
6.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2013). The Council for Exceptional Children’s position on core knowledge needed by school principals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 73–76.
7.
DeSimoneJ.MaldonadoM.RodriquezM. (2013). Attitudes about inclusion: Through the lens of practitioners and novices. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(1), 1–16.
8.
DiPaolaM.Tschannen-MoranM.Walter-ThomasC. (2004). School principals and special education: Creating the context for academic success. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(1), 1–10.
9.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015. (2015–2016). § 114 Stat.1177. Pub. L.No.114-95.
10.
FrostL.KerstenT. (2011). The role of the elementary principal in the instructional leadership of special education programs. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(2), 1–21.
11.
FullerE. (2011). Do principal preparation programs influence student achievement?Education Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 173–216.
12.
GlowackiH.HackmanD. (2016). The effectiveness of special education evaluation processes: Perspectives from elementary principals. Planning and Changing, 47, 191–209.
13.
GoorM.SchwennJ.BoyerL. (2007). Preparing principals for leadership in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 1–5.
14.
GrissomL.LoebS. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Education Research Journal, 48(5), 61–90.
15.
GuerraF. (2017). Special education programmatic needs for a principal preparation program. Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315336.
16.
HeadrickT. C. (2016). A note on the relationship between the Pearson product-moment and the Spearman rank-based coefficients of correlation. Open Journal of Statistics, 6, 1025–1027.doi:10.4236/ojs.2016.66082
17.
HoppeyD.McLeskeyJ. (2013). A case study of principal leadership in an effective inclusive school. Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 245–256.doi:10.1177/0022466910390507
18.
IrvineA.LupartJ. (2010). Educational leadership to create authentic inclusive schools: The experiences of principals in a Canadian rural school district. Exceptionality Education International, 20(2), 70–88.
19.
JohnsonA. (2016). Principals’ perceptions on the effectiveness of university preparation programs. NCPEA International Journal of Educational leadership, 11(1), 31–65.
20.
JonesN. D.BrownellM. T. (2013). Examining the use of classroom observations in the evaluation of special education teachers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 112–124.doi:10.1177/1534508413514103
21.
LawsonJ.CruzR. (2017). School administrators’ perception of the problem. The Journal of Special Education Leadership, 30(1), 6–18.
22.
LeithwoodK.LouisK.AndersonS. (2010). Inventing the links to improved student. Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
23.
LynchJ. M. (2012). Responsibilities of today’s principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40–47.doi:10.1177/875687051203100205
24.
MayesE.GethersK. (2018). Transformational leadership: Creating a learning culture in an age of accountability. AASA. Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 15(3), 1–17.
25.
MilliganJ.NealG.SingletonJ. (2014). Preparing effective administrators of special and gifted education programs. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 14(4), 62–68.
26.
MurphyC. (2018). Transforming inclusive education: nine tips to enhance school leaders’ ability to effectively lead inclusive special education programs. Journal of Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 87–100.
27.
Murtadha-WattsK.StoughtonE. (2004). Critical cultural knowledge in special education: Reshaping the responsiveness of school leaders. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(2), 1–8.
OsborneJ. A.RussoC. (2012). Special education and the law: A guide for practitioners (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.
30.
OsborneL. (2015). A systemic review of the relationship between principal characteristics and student achievement. National Center for Education Evaluation and Assistance, 1.
31.
OthmanL.KiernanL. (2013). Educators’ perspectives: Survey on the 2009 CEC advanced content standards. TLAR, 20(1), 31–46.
32.
PattersonJ. A. (2001). School leader’s guide to special education: Essentials for principals. Educational Research Service.
33.
PraisnerC. L. (2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 135–145.doi:10.1177/001440290306900201
34.
RobertsM.GuerraF. (2017). Principals perceptions of their knowledge in special: education. Current Issues in Education, 20(1), 1–17.
35.
RodlJ.BonifayW.CruzR.ManchandaS. (2018). A survey of school administrators’ training and support related to evaluating special education teachers. Journal of School, Administration Research and Development, 3(1), 1–35.
36.
RuffW. G.ShohoA. R. (2005). Understanding instructional leadership through the mental models of three elementary school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 554–577.doi:10.1177/0013161X04269621
37.
SteinbacherT.FixR.MahalS.SernaL.McKeownD. (2015). All you need is patience and flexibility: Administrators perspectives on special education knowledge and skills. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 28, 89–102.
38.
StyronJ. R. A.LeMireS. D. (2009). Principal preparation programs: Perceptions of high school principals. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(6), 51–62.
39.
The Wallace Foundation Report. (2016). Improving university principal reparation programs: Five themes from the field. The Wallace Foundation.
40.
WakemanS. Y.BrowderD. M.FlowersC.Ahlgrim-DelzellL. (2010). Principals’ knowledge of fundamental and current issues in special education. NASSP Bulletin, 90(2), 153–174.doi:10.1177/0192636506288858
41.
WoodsJ. (2014). A study of self-efficacy knowledge and communication in medicine. International Journal of Medicine Education, 5, 165–172.
42.
YacuzO. (2016). Educational leadership and comprehensive reform for improving equity and access for all. International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership, 11(10), 21–34.
43.
YoungM. D.MawhinneyH.ReedC. J. (2017). Leveraging standards to promote program quality. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(1), 12–42.doi:10.1177/1942775116641086
