Public School Board Presidents’ and Superintendents’ Perceptions of the Characteristics of Effective Superintendents in a Midwestern State

Abstract

The expectation for strong superintendent leadership has increased due to a demand for greater student achievement and accountability. This study examined public school board presidents’ and superintendents’ perceptions of the characteristics superintendents must possess to effectively lead in today's complex educational system.

A researcher-developed survey instrument was used to collect data from public school board presidents and superintendents in a Midwestern state. Computation of item means indicated school board presidents perceived developing a close, positive, and productive relationship with the school board, developing a culture and climate which enhances teacher morale and student achievement, developing partnerships between school and community, developing budgets and manage fiscal matters, and visibility throughout the community and district as the most important characteristics of effective superintendents. Superintendents perceived developing a culture and climate which enhances teacher morale and student achievement, developing a close positive, and productive relationship with the school board, building a team atmosphere and coherence, developing budgets and manage fiscal matters, and communicating with stakeholders as the most important characteristics of effective superintendents. School board presidents considered involvement of stakeholders in collaborative goal-setting and monitoring as well as superintendent visibility throughout the community and district to be significantly more important than did superintendents. In contrast, superintendents believed recruiting, selecting, developing personnel, and implementing effective evaluation structures to be significantly more important than did the superintendents.

Independent sample t tests revealed that small district public school superintendents perceived recruiting, selecting, developing personnel, and implementing effective evaluation structures as significantly more important than small district school board presidents did (p < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in perceptions for the 20 characteristics of effective superintendents between large district board presidents and superintendents, or between less experienced school board presidents and superintendents (p < .05). More experienced school board members perceived involving stakeholders in collaborative goal-setting and monitoring to be statistically significantly more important than did more experienced superintendents (p < .05).

Keywords

Superintendent Characteristics Board President Perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alabama Association of School Boards (AASB). (2007). The School Board President's Handbook. Alabama Association of School Boards, Montgomery, AL. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from https://ebssp.eboardsolutions.com/sites/aasb/Documents/Boardmanship%20Basics%20Booklets/The%20School%20Board%20President's%20Handbook%203rd%20Edition%202007.pdf.

Alsbury

, & Whitaker

(2006). Superintendent perspectives and practice of accountability, democratic voice and social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 154–174. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com.

American Association of School Administrators (AASA)-National School.

Board Association (NSBA) Committee. (1994). Roles and relationships: School boards and superintendents. Arlington, VA: The American Association of School Administrators.

Augenstein

, & Konnert

(1990). The superintendency in the nineties: What superintendents and board members need to know. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.

Bjork

(2005). The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Blanchard

, & Hersey

(2001). Management of organizational behavior. Leading human resources (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Burns

J. M.

(1978). Leadership/James MacGregor Burns. New York: Harper & Row.

Carter

G. R.

, & Cunningham

W. G.

(1997). The American school superintendent. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Covey

S. R.

(1991). Principle-Centered Leadership. New York, NY: Fireside.

11.

Doty

Linda Rae

(2012). School board members’ perceptions of superintendent leadership behaviors in upstate New York (Doctoral dissertation, St. John Fisher College). Retrieved from http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgiMewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=education_etd.

12.

Feuerstein

, & Opfer

V. D.

(1998). School board chairmen and school superintendents: An analysis of perceptions concerning special interest groups and educational governance. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 373–398.

13.

Fullan

(2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

14.

Fusarelli

, & Petersen

, (2002). Changing times, changing relationships: An exploration of current trends influencing the relationship between superintendents and boards of education. In Perreault

, & Lunenburg

F. C.

(Eds.), NCPEA 2002 yearbook: The changing world of school administration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. Retrieved from dighalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/view-content.cgi?article=1020&context=gse_fac.

15.

Goodman

, & Zimmerman

(2000). Thinking differently: Recommendations for 21st century school board/superintendent leadership, governance, and teamwork for high student achievement. Marlborough, MA: Educational Research Services and New England School Development Council. Retrieved from http://nesdec.org/Thinking_Differently.htm.

16.

Groholski

K. L.

(2009). District superintendent and school board president perceptions regarding leadership characteristics for superintendents of Texas schools (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1431493069?Accountid=14750.

17.

Haugland

M. M.

(1986). A comparative analysis of the professional competencies needed by superintendents of public schools perceived to be most desirable for successful employment by school board members and superintendents in South Dakota (role, non-renewal, dismissal) (Order No. 8616587). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of South Dakota; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (303516717). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/303516717?accountid=14750.

18.

Hendricks

(2006). An examination of bias variables that influence a school board member's perception of superintendent job performance evaluations (Order No. 3245231). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (304913580). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304913580?accountid=14750.

19.

Hoy

, & Miskel

(2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Hoyle

, Steffy

, & English

(1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders: Standards for peak performers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

21.

Iowa Association of School Boards (IASB). (2007). Leadership for student learning: The school board's role in creating school districts where all students succeed. Des Moines, LA: Iowa Association of School Boards.

22.

Iowa Department of Education 2015–2016 Public School Directory (2015). Retrieved from https://www.educateiowa.gov/documents/public-districts/2015/08/2015-2016–pubhc-district-directory.

23.

Iowa Standards for School Leaders. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.educateiowa.gov/sites/files/ed/documents/0809_pk12_eq_iowastandardsforschool-leaders.pdf.

24.

Lambert

(2003). District leadership. In Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

25.

Lewis

A.C.

, & Pardini

(2003). Effective superintendents, effective boards: Finding the right fit. Retrieved from http://www.ewa.org/.

26.

Long

J. S.

(1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

27.

Marzano

, & Waters

(2005). School leadership that works from research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

28.

Marzano

, & Waters

(2009). District leadership that works: Striking the right balance. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

29.

Moody

(2011). Superintendent-Board Relations: Understanding the Past to Promote the Future. California Association of Professors of Education Administration, 23, 75–84. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ965228.pdf.

30.

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.A. § 6301 et seq. (2002).

31.

Ohio standards for superintendents. (2008). Columbus, OH: Ohio Dept, of Education. Retrieved from https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Teaching/Educator-Equity/Ohio-s-Educator-Standards/Standards-for-Superin-tendentsfinal_nov2008.pdf.aspx.

32.

Patrick

S. W.

(2006). Superintendent search and selection practices in the state of Missouri (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri). Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/4349.

33.

Petersen

(1999). Demonstrated Actions of Instructional Leaders: An Examination of Five California Superintendents. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(18), 17–18. Retrieved from epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/download/553/676.

34.

Reuter

J. L. G.

(2009). Evolution of the superintendent's leadership role: How components of the leadership role in the superintendency have changed over time (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/18405.

35.

Running

P. J.

(2005). The role of the superintendent as perceived by school administrators and school board presidents in Texas public schools in region 20 ESC. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). Retrieved from http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/1363.

36.

Russonello, Stewart & Belden, conducted for Education Week (2005). Report of a national survey among superintendents: From the top down superintendents on instructional leadership. Washington, D.C.: Russonello, Stewart, & Belden. Retrieved from http://www.brspon.com/uploads/files/edweek-report.pdf.

37.

Schwahn

, & Spady

(1998). Total leaders: Apply the best future-focused change strategies to education. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

38.

Stronge

J. H.

, & Xu

(2012). Virginia department of education superintendent evaluation system: Research synthesis of Virginia superintendent evaluation competencies and standards. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Education. Retrieved from http://doe.virginia.gov/teaching/performanceevaluation/superintendent/index.shtml.

39.

Wilson

D. D.

(2006). Current perceptions of leadership characteristics for superintendents. (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305354839?accountid=14750.