Teacher Quality,Distribution,and Equity in ESSA

Abstract

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) changed federal teacher policy in a number of important ways. This article uses No Child Left Behind (NCLB), Race to the Top, NCLB waivers, and ESSA to detail these shifts. Since ESSA is in the early phase of implementation, we analyze the policy through the lens of previous empirical work as a way of anticipating how the various components of the law may function. The goal is to understand how the policy differs from previous federal efforts, detail the theory of action of teacher policy under ESSA, and provide concrete ways for educational leaders to implement the law. We find that ESSA focuses on the distribution of highly effective teachers and allows states more autonomy to define teacher quality.

Keywords

Teacher Policy ESSA Educational Policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2016). Lamar Alexander floor speech on ESSA regulations: Full transcript. Retrieved from http://edexcellence.net/articles/lamar-alexander-floor-speech-on-essa-regulations-full-transcript.

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2016). Every student succeeds act primer: Teachers and school leaders. Washington, DC: Author.

Ballou

(1996). Do public schools hire the best applicants? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 97–134.

Barton

(2003). Challenges and opportunities of NCLB for small, rural, and isolated schools (ERIC Document 482 267). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Lab.

Blazar

, & Kraft

(2015). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ academic behaviors and mindsets. Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.mathematicampr.com/∼/media/publications/pdfs/education/teaching%20effects%20on%20mindsets%20wp41.pdf.

Boldt

G. L.

, & Badiali

B. J.

(2016). Focus on research: Will the every child succeeds act allow for less qualified teachers? Retrieved from http://researchmatters.psu.edu/2016/03/28/focus-on-research-will-the-every-child-succeeds-act-allow-for-less-qualified-teachers/.

Branch

G. F.

, Hanushek

E. A.

, & Rivkin

S. G.

(2012). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals. CALDER Working Paper No. 66. Washington, DC: CALDER and American Institutes for Research.

Hirsch

, & Emerick

(2006). Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report on the 2005 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey (ERIC Number ED498770). Carrboro, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.

Clotfelter

C. T.

, Ladd

H. F.

, & Vigdor

J. L.

(2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377–392.

10.

Clotfelter

, Ladd

, Vigdor

J. L.

, & Wheeler

(2007). High-poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

11.

Coleman

J. S.

(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education National Center for Educational Statistics.

12.

Connally

(2016, January 11). How will ESSA influence states’ teacher quality efforts? Retrieved from https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/essa_teacherquality/.

13.

Darling-Hammond. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.

14.

Dean

, Hassel

B. C.

, Ayscue Hassel

, & Steiner

(2016). ESSA: New law, new opportunity. Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact.

15.

Dee

T. S.

(2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.

16.

Delisle

(2014, November). Assistant Secretary Letter on Equitable Access to Excellent Educators. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/equitable/letter11102014.html.

17.

Donovan

M. S.

, & Cross

C. T.

(2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

18.

Education Counsel. (2015, December 2). Summary analysis of the every student succeeds act. Retrieved from http://educationcounsel.com/?publication=summary-analysis-every-student-succeeds-act.

19.

Ehlert

, Koedel

, Parsons

, & Podgursky

(2016). Selecting growth measures for use in school evaluation systems: Should proportionality matter? Educational Policy, 30(3), 465–500.

20.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

, & Brewer

D. J.

(1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review. 14(1), 1–23.

21.

Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015).

22.

Ferguson

R. F.

(19991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465–499.

23.

Ferguson

R. F.

, & Ladd

H. F.

(1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In Ladd

H. F.

(Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

24.

Gershenson

, Holt

S. B.

, & Papageorge

N. W.

(2015). Who believes in me? Effect of student-teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Upjohn Institute Working Paper 15–231, Retrieved from http://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artcile=1248&context=up_workingpapers.

25.

Goldhaber

, Choi

H. J.

, & Cramer

(2007). A descriptive analysis of the distribution of NBPTS-certified teachers in North Carolina. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 160–172.

26.

Goldhaber

, Lavery

, & Theobald

(2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 20(10), 1–15.

27.

Green

(1983). Excellence, equity and equality. In Shulman

L. S.

, and Sykes

(Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 318–341). New York, NY: Longman, Inc.

28.

Grissom

J. A.

, Nicholson-Crotty

, & Nicholson-Crotty

(2009). Race, region, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administrative Review, 69(5), 911–919.

29.

Grissom

J. A.

(2012). Revisiting the impact of participative decision making on public employee retention: The moderating influence of effective managers. American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 400–418.

30.

Grissom

J. A.

, & Keiser

(2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 557–580.

31.

Grissom

J. A.

, Loeb

, & Nakashima

(2014). Strategic involuntary teacher transfers and teacher performance: Examining equity and efficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 112–140.

32.

Grissom

J. A.

, Nicholson-Crotty

, & Keiser

(2012). Does my boss's gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 649–673.

33.

Grissom

J. A.

, Rubin

, Neumerski

C. M.

, Cannata

, Drake

T. A.

, Goldring

, & Schuermann

(2017). Central office supports for data-driven talent management decisions: Evidence from the implementation of new systems for measuring teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(1): 21–32.

34.

Hanushek

(1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84–117.

35.

Hitt

D. H.

, & Tucker

P. D.

(2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569.

36.

Ingersoll

R. M.

(2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.

37.

Jackson

C. K.

(2012). Non-cognitive ability, test scores, and teacher quality: Evidence from 9th grade teachers in North Carolina. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper # 18624. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18624.

38.

Jacob

B. A.

(2007). The challenges of staffing urban schools with effective teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 129–153.

39.

Jacobsen

, & Saultz

(2016). Comparing satisfaction in schools and other public arenas. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(2): 476–497.

40.

Jennings

J. L.

, & DiPrete

T. A.

(2010). Teacher effects on social and behavioral skills in early elementary school. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 135–159.

41.

Kolbe

, & King Rice

(2012). And they're off: Tracking federal Race to the Top investments from the starting gate. Educational Policy, 26(1), 185–209.

42.

Kumashiro

(2015, December 14). Why every student will NOT succeed with the new education law. Retrieved from: http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/12/188460/why-every-student-will-not-succeed-new-education-law.

43.

Lankford

, Loeb

, McEachin

, Miller

L. C.

, & Wyckoff

(2014). Who enters teaching? Encouraging evidence that the status of teaching is improving. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 444–453.

44.

Lankford

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.

45.

Levin

, & Quinn

(2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. New York, NY: The New Teacher Project.

46.

Loeb

, Kalogrides

, & Béteille

(2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304.

47.

Loeb

, & Miller

L. C.

(2006). A review of state teacher policies: What are they, what are their effects, and what are their implications for school finance. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice.

48.

Loeb

, & Miller

L. C.

(2009). A federal foray into teacher certification: Assessing the highly qualified provision of NCLB. In Rebell

M. A.

, & Wolff

J. R.

(Eds.), NCLB at the crossroads (pp. 199–229). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

49.

Loeb

, & Reininger

(2004). Public policy and teacher labor markets: What we know and why it matters. The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.

50.

McDermott

K. A.

(2011). High stakes reform: The politics of educational accountability. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

51.

McGuinn

(2016). From no child left behind to the every student succeeds act: Federalism and the education legacy of the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Advance online publication, doi: 10.1093/publius/pjw014.

52.

McMurrer

(2007). Implementing the No Child Left Behind teacher requirements. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

53.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html.

54.

Ohio Department of Education. (2016). Guaranteeing equitable access to effective teachers using the state equity plan. August 24th. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/EveryStudent-Succeeds-Act-ESSA.

55.

Pennington

(2014). ESEA waivers and teacher-evaluation plans: State oversight of district-designed teacher-evaluation systems. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/report/2014/05/07/89121/esea-waivers-and-teacher-evaluation-plans/.

56.

Peske

H. G.

, & Haycock

(2006). Teacher inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.

57.

Phenicie

(2016). Obama administration, at odds with congress, doubles down on ESSA equity regulations. The Seventy Four Million. https://www.the74million.org/article/obama-administration-at-odds-with-congress-touts-essa-equity-regs

58.

Presley

J. B.

, White

B. R.

, & Gong

(2005). Examining the distribution and impact of teacher quality in Illinois (Policy Research Report IERC 2005-2). Edwardsville, IL: Education Research Council.

59.

Reeves

(2003). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts (ERIC Document 475 037). Northcentral Regional Lab.

60.

Rivkin

S. G.

, Hanushek

E. A.

, Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

61.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.

62.

Roza

(2016, April 27). The sunlight effect: More equitable spending on its way regardless of rulemaking. The Brookings Brown Center Chalkboard Blog. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/brown-center-chalkboard/posts/2016/04/27-sunUght-effect-equitable-spending-education-roza.

63.

Roza

, & Yatsko

(2010). Beyond teacher reassignment: Better ways districts can remedy inequities across schools. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.

64.

Rubenstein

, Schwartz

A. E.

, & Stiefel

(2006). Rethinking the intradistrict distribution of school inputs to disadvantaged students. Paper presented at the “Rethinking Rodriguez: Education as a Fundamental Right” Conference. Berkeley, CA.

65.

Safier

K. L.

(2007). Improving teacher quality in Ohio: The limitations of the highly qualified teacher provision of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Journal of Law & Education, 36(1), 65–87.

66.

Sanders

W. L.

, & Rivers

J. C.

(1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.

67.

Saultz

(2017). Fourth time is the charm: Charter school policy and the influence of the elite in Washington state. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(1): 53–63.

68.

Saultz

, McEachin

, & Fusarelli

L. D.

(2016). Waivering as governance: Federalism during the Obama administration. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 358–366.

69.

Sawchuk

(2016). ESSA's teacher-quality grant: Everything you need to know. Education Week. Retrieved May 29, 2016 from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2016/04/essa_teacher_quality_grant_revisions.html.

70.

Skrla

, & Scheurich

J.J.

(2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 235–259.

71.

Skrla

, Scheurich

J. J.

, García

, & Nolly

(2004). Equity audits: A practical leadership tool for developing equitable and excellent schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 133–161.

72.

Tichnor-Wagner

, Harrison

, & Cohen-Vogel

(2016). Cultures of learning in effective high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 602–642.

73.

Tracy

C. O.

, & Walsh

(2004). Necessary and insufficient: Resisting a full measure of teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.

74.

Ujifusa

(2016a). Teacher-pay equity: An unforeseen ESSA wrinkle. Education Week. Retrieved May 29, 2016 from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacher-beat/2016/03/teacher_pay_equity_an_unforese.html.

75.

Ujifusa

(2016b). Education department releases ESSA accountability rules. Education Week. Retrieved May 29, 2016 from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2016/05/essa_accountability_rules_release_education_department.html.

76.

Ujifusa

(2016c). Education secretary advocates robust ESSA rules amid GOP backlash, Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2016/05/john_bking_jr_essa_funding_rule_civil_rights.html.

77.

United States Department of Education. (2009). Race to the. Top Program, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: Author.

78.

United States Department of Education. (2012a). The opportunity of ESEA flexibility: Protecting students and supporting local education solutions. Washington, DC: Author.

79.

United States Department of Education. (2012b). ESEA flexibility. Washington, DC: Author.

80.

U.S. Department of Education. (2015, April 10). State plans to ensure equitable access to excellent educators: Frequently asked questions. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/equitable/eafaq2015.pdf.

81.

United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Civil Rights Data Collection Data Snapshot: Teacher Equity (Issue Brief No. 4). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offlces/list/ocr/docs/crdc-teacher-equity-snapshot.pdf

82.

Wahlstrom

K. L.

, & Louis

K. S.

(2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.

83.

Walsh

, & Snyder

(2004). Searching the attic: How states are responding to the nation's goal of placing a highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.

84.

Wenglinsky

(2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

85.

Wenglinsky

(2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12).