This study sought to discover how one high school principal sustains a context for continued improvement through PLCs using case study methodology. Schools comprised of PLCs allow educators to grapple with the unique needs of their students in their specific contexts. The problem is that there is limited literature and research to indicate how leaders sustain PLCs over time. Therefore, the overarching research question of this study was: How do the principal, PLC leaders, and teachers in a school that has developed and implemented PLCs describe their experience of the change process to sustain the work of continuous improvement?
AchinsteinB. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455.
2.
Bambrick-SantoyoP. (2012). Leverage leadership: A practical guide to building exceptional schools.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BowgrenL., & SeverK. (2010). Differentiated professional development in a professional learning community.Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
4.
BrownK. M., & AnfaraV. A.Jr. (2003). Paving the way for change: Visionary leadership in action at the middle level. NASSP Bulletin, 87(635), 16–34.
5.
BrykA., CamburnE., & LouisK. S. (1999). Promoting school improvement through professional communities: An analysis of Chicago elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 707–750.
6.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BurnetteB. (2002). How we formed our community. Journal of Staff Development, 23(1), 51–54.
8.
ChristensenC. M., HornM. B., & JohnsonC. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
CollinsJ. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap … and others don't.New York, NY: HarperCollins.
10.
CranstonJ. (2009). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Eight themes from research on principals’ perceptions of professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 90, 1–19.
11.
CranstonJ. (2011). Relational trust: The glue that binds a professional learning community. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 59–72.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
DuFourR. (1995). Restructuring is not enough. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 33–36.
15.
DuFourR. (2003). Building professional learning communities. School Administrator, 60(5), 13–18.
16.
DuFourR. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”?Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
17.
DuFourR., & MarzanoR. (2009). High-leverage strategies for principal leadership. Educational Leadership66(5), 62–68.
18.
DuFourR., & MarzanoR. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement.Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
19.
DuFourR., DuFourR., EakerR., & KarhanekG. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don't learn.Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
20.
DuFourR., DuFourR., EakerR., & ManyT. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work.Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
21.
DunneF., & HontsF. (1998). “That group really makes me think!” Critical friends groups and the development of reflective practitioners (ED 423 228). San Diego, CA:
22.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success.New York, NY: Random House.
23.
ElmoreR. F. (2008). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
24.
FullanM. G. (1982). The meaning of educational change.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
FullanM. G. (2005). Professional learning communities writ large. In DuFourR., EakerR., & DuFourR. (Eds.), On common ground (pp. 209–223). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
26.
GilesC., & HargreavesA. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156.
27.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd edition). New York, NY: Longman.
28.
HargreavesA., & GoodsonI. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.
29.
HippK. K., & HuffmanJ. B. (2003). Professional learning communities: Assessment-development-effects (ED 482 255).
30.
HippK. K., HuffmanJ. B., PankakeA. M., & OlivierD. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 173–195.
31.
HollinsE. R., McIntyreL. R., DeBoseC., HollinsK. S., & TownerA. (2004). Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: Investigating an internal model for teacher development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(2), 247–264.
32.
HordS. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement (ED 410 659). Austin, TX:
33.
HordS. M. (1998). Creating a professional learning community: Cottonwood Creek School. Issues … about Change, 6(2), 1–8.
34.
HordS. M., & SommersW. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
KruseS., LouisK. S., & BrykA. (1994). Building professional community in schools. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 6, 3–6.
36.
KvaleS., & BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LeclercM., MoreauA. C., DumouchelC., & Sallafranque-St-LouisF. (2012). Factors that promote progression in schools functioning as professional learning community. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(7), 1–14.
38.
LouisK. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 1–20.
39.
LouisK. S. (2008). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities. In ColeR., & BlankensteinA. (Eds.), Sustaining professional learning communities (pp. 41–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
LujanN., & DayB. (2010). Professional learning communities: Overcoming the roadblocks. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 76(2), 10–17.
41.
LouisK. S., & MarksH. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
42.
LouisK. S., MarksH., & KruseS. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.
43.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
McLaughlinL., & HyleA. E. (2001). The school principal as change agent: An explanatory case study (ED 456 516).
45.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals (ED 357 023).
46.
McTigheJ. (2008). Making the most of professional learning communities. The Learning Principal, 3(8), 1–6.
47.
MerriamS. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
MullenC. A., & HutingerJ. L. (2008). The principal's role in fostering collaborative learning communities through faculty study group development. Theory Into Practice, 47(4), 276–285.
49.
NathanL. (2008). Teachers talking together: The power of professional community. Horace, 24(1), 2–5.
50.
SchechterC. (2012). The professional learning community as perceived by Israeli school superintendents, principals and teachers. International Review of Education, 58(6), 717–734.
51.
SchmokerM. (2011). Focus: Elevating the essentials to radically improve student learning.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
52.
ScribnerJ. P., CockrellK. S., CockrellD. H., & ValentineJ. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130–160.
53.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (2nd edition). New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
54.
ThessinR. A. (2010). A qualitative study of teachers’ work in professional learning communities in a small urban district. Dissertation from the Graduate School of Education of Harvard University.
55.
WellsC., & FeunL. (2007). Implementing of learning community principles: A study of six high schools. NASSP Bulletin, 91(2), 141–160.
56.
WellsC., & FeunL. (2013). Educational change and professional learning communities: A study of two districts. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 233–257.
57.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
